Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[joel321]

What about anti-magnetism?  Not to be confused with anti-gravity.

Didn't I mentioned that I'm more in the psychological side of things rather than the technical level you devil (6666 posts).

I don't even know what anti-magnetism is but does it have a particle attracted to it?

[sadang]

You have quite right joel321. This is the right path to understand the universe and its rules of which we are part of. When someone is heavy technical, it will lose the big picture. Being technically means only an attempt to shape the immediate surrounding reality, according to the specialization referred. The result of this modeling will always be one out of rules governing the Universe. And just think, I talked about only one technical mind, without taking into account the influences of the other surrounding technical minds.

Ken, is not only a technical mind, he has many other bricks at the base of his way of thinking, and this is the reason I give him so many appreciations. And of course, having other references than the common peoples, it is difficult to make himself understood by those who go only on well-trodden paths without deviating from them any millimeter, whether consciously or unconsciously.

I know many like him, and if you look into history, you will see that they are those who truly shapes the reality over time. Of course, they will have to face the inertia of masses of the people, but considering the inertia (even philosophically speaking) is just a feature of the dynamics, they always will train those around them, in their own way of thinking and modeling reality.

Going further, I see many use words as anti... There is no anti anywhere in the Universe, than our own minds. Is just a wrong way of interpretation of different phenomena which are complementary, being anti only in our limited way of seeing the phenomena. Only in our limited frame of thinking, limits imposed by our own will, shaped in its turn by the current paradigm of thinking, more than 80% of the actual peoples don't even being aware of these borders, of this cage of thinking.

There is no "anti" at all, there is only complementary dynamics, because the entire Universe, whether we talk about seen or unseen, known or unknown Universe, work on harmony and complementarity, otherwise it can't exists at all. All "anti"... mental concepts and resulting phenomena that could potentially exists, are all shaped by young civilizations, in their own caged worlds, ruled by their own emanated laws and rules, far away from the Universe's rules. Always supervised by old and wise civilizations.

The existence of a reaction as an answer to an action, is merely a phenomena of complementarity than one of an opposite action. Their existence only in complementarity is a must, otherwise they don't exist at all! They are both one single thing, one single dynamic, only our way of thinking make us see them as two independent phenomena. They have all a single point of generation (for the our current shaped world), one which is spaceless and timeless. Or with Ken words; the dielectric convergent inertial plane. This is a heavy phrase, or a meaningless one, if someone is not accustomed with Ken's theory, words, way of thinking. Or is not used to think about the so called external reality for himself, with his own mental concepts. For those who have this ability, it can be simply seen as the ancient ether and its modality of manifestations.

Try to read the last book of Ken and will start to see things in a different way, and will see the magnetism is not a field (a mental abstract concept), but it has a consistent intrinsic nature, a point of origin and a specific way of manifestation. Just read it with an open mind, and you will be more gained than reading a book about microwaves for example.

[ramset]

Joel
Thanks for your thoughts.


Maybe...just maybe ....they will be like a line in the sand ....
and bring some change to this discussion and its "Flavor"...


or maybe just one grain on the scale of change.....


thx


Chet

[Pirate88179]

Going further, I see many use words as anti... There is no anti anywhere in the Universe, than our own minds. Is just a wrong way of interpretation of different phenomena which are complementary, being anti only in our limited way of seeing the phenomena. Only in our limited frame of thinking, limits imposed by our own will, shaped in its turn by the current paradigm of thinking, more than 80% of the actual peoples don't even being aware of these borders, of this cage of thinking.

There is no "anti" at all, there is only complementary dynamics, because the entire Universe, whether we talk about seen or unseen, known or unknown Universe, work on harmony and complementarity, otherwise it can't exists at all. All "anti"... mental concepts and resulting phenomena that could potentially exists, are all shaped by young civilizations, in their own caged worlds, ruled by their own emanated laws and rules, far away from the Universe's rules. Always supervised by old and wise civilizations.

No anti?  So, no antibiotics? Antimony? Anti gravity research? Anti anxiety medicine? Antifouling paint in the Navy? Antimatter? Antioxident in vitamins? Antifogging spray used in aircraft?  No antipasto?  Wow, you must live in a much different world than I do.

Do you not use antifreeze in your auto's radiator?  Does that not exist either?

All of these things, and many, many more are in my universe.

Bill

[sadang]

Keep asking Bill! Just keep asking! Deep not superficially! It's enough for beginning! The answers will slightly start to rise, bit by bit! But only if you will continue to ask!

And also, don't make the same errors as many technical people do, namely don't be lead only by the moment emotional reactions, and use only a convenient part of a text. You forgot to make quotes of the following paragraph, without which the meaning of what I said is quite different. I mean the following paragraph

"The existence of a reaction as an answer to an action, is merely a phenomena of complementarity than one of an opposite action. Their existence only in complementarity is a must, otherwise they don't exist at all! They are both one single thing, one single dynamic, only our way of thinking make us see them as two independent phenomena..."

After that come back and tell me with the hand on your heart, that the meaning of word antibiotics is really opposed to word biotics. Are they two separate concepts, or they could exists only together? Are they real manifestations in the Universe, or are they just merely humans concepts, available here and now in this shaped reality? And be ready to go as deeply and comprehensive as you can with this explanation!

Now please be kind and tell me if day and night are two different and opposed things, or just one phenomenon, manifesting as two separate and apparently opposed things only in our interpretations? And relative to what? Follow the same pattern for other dualist and opposed terms that you used in your message!