Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

joel321

First I would like to say that your vocabulary is wayyy more advanced than my limited one. English is my second language (I'm Hispanic) but I will try to understand you deep meaning since I mostly focus on the deep meanings.

QuoteThis is the right path to understand the universe and its rules of which we are part of. When someone is heavy technical, it will lose the big picture. Being technically means only an attempt to shape the immediate surrounding reality, according to the specialization referred. The result of this modeling will always be one out of rules governing the Universe. And just think, I talked about only one technical mind, without taking into account the influences of the other surrounding technical minds.

The way I see it is just simple as just looking at the solar system. We have harmful sun rays from the sun, we have meteorites bombarding, we have many things that are "harmful" to our earth but at the end of the day if there was more "negativity" than "positivity" to it, then we would not be existing right now. IOW, the balance of the earth would be thrown out of control. So, the logic even in the mind is to always keep negativity less than 50%. 100% facts right there no ifs or whats about it. If the atmosphere even allowed harmful rays to his us, we would not be in balance as we speak.

That also can be seen in human socialism/relationships. There cannot be more negative than positive to keep at a balance where a balance ONLY makes you "evolve"...period.

QuoteKen, is not only a technical mind, he has many other bricks at the base of his way of thinking, and this is the reason I give him so many appreciations. And of course, having other references than the common peoples, it is difficult to make himself understood by those who go only on well-trodden paths without deviating from them any millimeter, whether consciously or unconsciously.

Since we are social animals, we always need influencing by others since this is rooted in all animals. This again can relate to the solar system. In my mind, I can see that the other planets are important to the balance of the earth. Like the planets are all a family in space helping one another. The mother is the sun and the father is "gravity" since those are the dominant energies. The earth is the child of our solar system. If there is was no balance in the solar system, then we would not be here plain and symple.

So this is the same to us humans here on earth. If a family is a solar system and there is a weak ozone protection to the mother and father, then there will UNBALANCED. The the family will go like the DODO bird will. The answer is in the understanding how things work and applying them to the rest of the universe to be able to see the big picture.

So I agree ken has a great mind. If all of the other minds came together to become balanced, his mind (like others) would be even greater!

QuoteI know many like him, and if you look into history, you will see that they are those who truly shapes the reality over time. Of course, they will have to face the inertia of masses of the people, but considering the inertia (even philosophically speaking) is just a feature of the dynamics, they always will train those around them, in their own way of thinking and modeling reality.

Yes history mistakes are our future knowledge. It is pretty simple, with balance, our minds can reach a point where everything becomes balanced like our solar system. And this positive influence from others is out food for the roots to grow stronger and bigger. That is the holly grail of knowledge and understanding...the balance.

When people reach that state, everything is paradise. Where there is 40% negativity and 60% positivity. Like I mentioned the earth has meteorites bombarding it, but there is "phenomena/law/whatever you want to call it" to keep them in check as to not destroy the earth. And the balance goes all the way down to health...etc etc etc

QuoteGoing further, I see many use words as anti... There is no anti anywhere in the Universe, than our own minds. Is just a wrong way of interpretation of different phenomena which are complementary, being anti only in our limited way of seeing the phenomena. Only in our limited frame of thinking, limits imposed by our own will, shaped in its turn by the current paradigm of thinking, more than 80% of the actual peoples don't even being aware of these borders, of this cage of thinking.

I think I see what you mean, for example in two magnet pieces. S and N pole, where they attract each other is magnetism and when they repel each other is anti-magnetism to them. Maybe a wrong analogy but there are more. The "anti" is just a way of using the same molecules as a way to slow down the other molecules down. Like antifreeze. Antifreeze is composed of water and water is composed of hmmm water...the difference is only in adding water with molecular rearranging ONLY. IOW, both water and antifreeze are still 95% (or more?) the same, just the anti is a little "rearrangement" in the molecular level. So what that means is that the "anti" is not something different all together.

QuoteThere is no "anti" at all, there is only complementary dynamics, because the entire Universe, whether we talk about seen or unseen, known or unknown Universe, work on harmony and complementarity, otherwise it can't exists at all. All "anti"... mental concepts and resulting phenomena that could potentially exists, are all shaped by young civilizations, in their own caged worlds, ruled by their own emanated laws and rules, far away from the Universe's rules. Always supervised by old and wise civilizations.

People forget about the past easy. This is what differentiates scientists from regular everyday people. The scientists write it down with paper and pencil and then compare notes. All humans do this in their mind to, so in a way all humans are scientists too, but they are less successful that actually writing it down in stone. That is the only difference I see from all humans. We are all born to understand and learn, the simple fact that writing stuff down than merely just "remembering" them makes a HUGE difference. But also, there is a limit of people not being able to think past a certain point. Like you can think wayyy farther than someone else easy based on your years and years of thinking and it could also be genetic. These people exist that think wayyyyy farther than others in their head.

QuoteThe existence of a reaction as an answer to an action, is merely a phenomena of complementarity than one of an opposite action. Their existence only in complementarity is a must, otherwise they don't exist at all! They are both one single thing, one single dynamic, only our way of thinking make us see them as two independent phenomena. They have all a single point of generation (for the our current shaped world), one which is spaceless and timeless. Or with Ken words; the dielectric convergent inertial plane. This is a heavy phrase, or a meaningless one, if someone is not accustomed with Ken's theory, words, way of thinking. Or is not used to think about the so called external reality for himself, with his own mental concepts. For those who have this ability, it can be simply seen as the ancient ether and its modality of manifestations.

I need to learn how to grasp those meanings....dielectric, convergen, inertial, ether, do not make anything click in my small brain. Zero, nothing all alien language to me. But I only seek the balance and from what I have seen and gathered the insults from him are only in self defense. IMO.

QuoteTry to read the last book of Ken and will start to see things in a different way, and will see the magnetism is not a field (a mental abstract concept), but it has a consistent intrinsic nature, a point of origin and a specific way of manifestation. Just read it with an open mind, and you will be more gained than reading a book about microwaves for example.

Do you mind pointing me to the book? I'll read it with my best open mind ability. Thanks.

TwoWheelFree

I am rather new to this forum.  Perhaps it is  because of my newbie status that I cannot find the original post.  I would most appreciate a reply with as to how/where I can obtain the free book and/or videos.  Thanks.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: joel321 on December 27, 2014, 10:31:57 PM
two magnet pieces. S and N pole, where they attract each other is magnetism and when they repel each other is anti-magnetism to them.


magnetic attraction doesnt exist as per its current and long long held denotation and connotation.



everything in the universe is force and motion, or inertia and acceleration,       divergence being the former, and convergence being the later.


All Ether modalities (dielectric, magneticm, 'gravity', electricity) are irrefutably reducible to a single principle with a polarized modality which is merely the single principle expressed by Subject (inertia) and (its) attribute (divergence, or as implied force and motion, i.e. a spatially quantifiable vector(s)..)




"If you were to tell someone close to you that 'there is utterly no such thing as magnetic attraction', they would inquire as to your
medication or wonder what the punch line is. The very premise, from countless thousands of years past to the present, as evidenced
from 'magnets' accelerating nails, iron bits, and ferrous objects to the 'magnet', and 'opposite poles attracting/accelerating towards
each other', is as deeply ingrained in the human consciousness as the Sun rising in the East every morning. The ancient lie, this
perceptual titanic error is as innate as breathing. As is the case, all attraction (and 'repulsion') is governed by dielectricity, not
magnetism, which is the 'dielectric field' -Faraday, which in discharging, is the radiation Ether-modality we call magnetism. That
magnetism is reaching out (as, in the creation of) "into" space is not in question, however radiation only displaces things, as in the case of magnetism, causes an
inductive reaction at the interatomic magneto-dielectric of ferrous objects, thereby causing dielectric coherency from magnetic
displacement and resultant acceleration to the 'magnet' as the act of dielectric voidance. Radiation attracts nothing. Soon you will
find out the simplex nature of the "magnet" which is powered by dielectric coherency (either I.D.C. induced dielectric coherency, or
I.D.C.C. induced dielectric capacitance and coherency) and likewise you will have a clear, lucid, logical, coherent, proved
understanding of magnets and magnetism that explains all observed phenomena of same" - Uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: sadang on December 27, 2014, 04:22:11 AM
I see many use words as anti... There is no anti anywhere in the Universe


extremely intelligent statement, altogether true of course.


also why there exists not ONE straight line in the universe,  force and motion , and inertia and acceleration are MUTUALLY IMPLICATIVE WHOLES, of a single principle.


saying a thrown ball in the air which is now falling down ,....is an "anti-throw" of course is ABSURD



inertia has no opposite, the loss of inertia as necessitatively expressed IN and AS force and motion is still an INERTIA MODALITY IN EXTRAPOLATION as we dumb humans QUANTIFY and QUALIFY it as spatial and temporal, both of which dont exist, rather are mutual curvilinear vector measures of the loss of inertia .


the ancient greeks had a term for this that exists NO GOOD english translation (as a greek translator myself of ancient Platonism) ,.....however translated crudely as "necessary"


but a close definition would be "it cannot exist any other way, all else is impossible,   i.e. the greek term ANANKE


sadang

@ joel321

Don't worry about the language. I have the ability to see beyond the words, sentences or paragraphs even if they are wrong used. Try to always keep a balance between deep searching and holistic view of Universe on your path! Why have to follow this pattern of thinking, will find yourself when will advance on the path.

Because I see you do many references and analogies to the solar system, let me show you something that will help to extend a bit your understandings of the word and mental concept of "BALANCE":
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jHsq36_NTU
- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_AimeKbiMnU

Otherwise be patient and curious about everything, and never believe just for sake something you do not understand deeply. Give them all right temporarily, but reserve the right to study and understand yourself, what is unclear to you.

And because you are hispanic, and have a great and long history behind you, would be a great advantage to study the official history and mythologies of your country, to find where your ancestor come from, their ancient rules, and will find more valuable answers than reading current scientific books.

Here is the book of Ken about how him see the magnetism and not only:
- https://archive.org/details/magnetism1small