Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Wikipedia:'Virtual particles are conceptual devices

tell that BS to the "expert" assholes who state::::::

[TheoriaApophasis]

Of course, what those wave functions (virtual or real)

even the ancient GREEKS understood this.


and yet your "MODERN" ass does NOT.


a wave is an ATTRIBUTE


a wave is NOT a PROPERTY or a SUBJECT


A wave is what X  DOES


A wave is not X



There is GOLD in a GOLDEN LION statues


there is no LION in the GOLD 




Its ok, youre merely the PRODUCT of a FUCKED EDUCATION SYSTEM that NEVER TAUGHT YOU how to THINK


not all the fault lay at your feet 




A WAVE is not VIRTUAL OR REAL 


A wave is an ATTRIBUTE of a PRIOR PRINCIPLE





"I got hit with a wave !!! It hurt!" 

No dummy, you got hit with WATER   

[profitis]

'Virtual particles are conceptual devices

--- End quote ---


Apophasis:'tell that BS to the "expert" assholes who state::::::


Vre malaka is your boson any LESS CONCEPTUAL.no

[sarkeizen]

as a Platonist, and a translator of ancient Greek and a consummate expert in Platonic and Neoplatonic logic, you will NEVER in life run across someone MORE steeped in logical examination than myself.

...who can't apply the logical fallacies correctly.

Notice how you have to pretend you're some kind of expert in order to dismiss other peoples arguments without showing your work.   This earns the "expert in Platonic and Neoplatonic logic" a D- in logic.

[sarkeizen]

You still continue the "who's smarter" game. You still continue interpreting in a malicious manner my words, talking only about my words and making abstraction of the Planck's written words, and on the other hand avoiding to express your own words.

It's not about who's smarter nor am I being malicious I'm just saying this is what you are communicating and it's ok for you to admit that you don't know what you're talking about instead of making up crap to make yourself feel better.    Again if you asked me a question in my field I'd be able to give you a much better answer than some vague allusions to errors and then when asked to clarify tell them they have to figure out what I meant on their own.  By my own metrics I understand a very small portion of my field and therefore by extension you know almost nothing about what you are talking about.

Who's more evasive here, me who

...won't answer an elementary framing question?  Yes that wins you some award for avoiding the question.

Before to learn to win you have to learn to loose!

...and someone who whines "LOOK AT ALL THE ERRORS IN PHYSICS" and when asked "Oh, where?" avoids the question by saying "Find them for yourself".

Is not someone who has learned to lose