Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

-- Quote from: profitis on Today at 10:01:18 AM --- your boson theory

--- End quote ---


Apophasis:'I never mention any such BS'

Your magneto-oscillatio has never been observed.sounds like you want to create a new breed of tax-waisters on the state coffers

[picowatt]

From TA:

"respect where respect is due"

Well then, I guess I was just raised to be more polite and considerate of others.  Surely, the foul language, insults, and disrespect you reply with warrants absolutely no respect from me towards you.

But still, I manage to keep a "civil tongue"...


As for your Unicorn versus horse analogy, that is totally off the mark.

Science has mostly moved on from the idea that particles are little physical balls of something.  Although the word particle (and proton, electron, neutron, quark, etc) has continued to be used, their conceptualizations have changed significantly.  They are, for the most part, modeled as wave functions (well, they are still working on modeling a few).

Why is it so difficult, therefore, to believe that something that may only be a wave function cannot be created from a specific set of conditions wherein the proper excitation of the aether causes that wave function to be produced in a given space?

Of course, what those wave functions (virtual or real) are of, or in, remains to be understood, but if that is all a real particle is, why is it so hard to imagine the existence of a virtual, or almost complete, wave function that, through the addition of the proper conditions of phase or frequency (for example), can manifest as a real particle?
   
Possibly you still cling to the concept of matter being made of little physical balls of something (particles).
I do not...

[sadang]

@ sarkeizen

You still continue the "who's smarter" game. You still continue interpreting in a malicious manner my words, talking only about my words and making abstraction of the Planck's written words, and on the other hand avoiding to express your own words. Who's more evasive here, me who came with Plank's words and my own interpretation or you who avoid to read them at least? "Good" for you! Just continue this way and will remove any trace of doubt about your "smartness"!

Before to learn to win you have to learn to loose!

---

@ Qwert

I read his book and many, many others from alternative science and from current scientific dogma. All these just for funny, or maybe just for understanding?

What stop you to make your own research on the subject of that book and come back with your own words and interpretation of the results? Not just complain here what is described in that book is not according to current scientific dogma! And keep your language in discussions with me in the limits of a common sense dictionary.

After you have read as much as he, probably will notify yourself as broad and deep as he, the ridiculousness of the current science, and perhaps you will feel entitled to behave the same. I reiterate, perhaps but not strict necessarily. Each with his temperament! You only seek to understand the essence, as much as you can and if you can. If not, give ignore and move on on your way.

But I like how the discussion with me give rise to passions. This could also be a way!

[profitis]

Wikipedia:'Virtual particles are conceptual devices that in a sense try to by-pass Heisenberg's insight, by offering putative or virtual explanatory visualizations for the inner workings of subatomic processes.'


And yet mr apophasis' very own boson-theories fall precisely into this category..'elusiveness'..hotair

[TheoriaApophasis]

Science has mostly moved on from the idea that particles are little physical balls of something.

Its done NO SUCH BS,  its 100% PURE UNCUT GREEK ATOMISM



quasi particles

muons
gluons
negative momentum particles
virtual particles
subatomic particles

electron particles  (PURE ABSOLUTE TOTAL FUCKING BULLSHIT OF THE HIGHEST ORDER!)



SO, total 100% PURE SHIT on that statement of yours !

Possibly you still cling to the concept of matter being made of little physical balls of something (particles).
I do not...

I do NO SUCH THING, rather THE OPPOSITE

not only dumb but ALSO DEAF apparently