Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[gravityblock]

Demented child...........  EACH "side" OF EVERY MAGNET ON EARTH HAS TWO vortex movements,  ONE centrifugal, and ONE centripetal


So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients
   

Which side is moving which direction?!!!

N pole is moving centrifugally CW and centripetally CCW

S pole is moving centrifugally CCW, and centripetally CW



back to school with you.

No, it's back to school for you.  Duel Counter Rotating Homopolar Motor (Magnetic Vortex Motor - Part 4)!  This video clearly shows the conductive discs moving in opposite directions over opposite poles and not in the same rotation direction as you and TinMan wrongly and falsely asserts.

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

So you send off a mans work to Investors and business men
with out even asking him??

In CASE YOU DIDNT NOTICE SON,  his videos are on an OPEN INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC YOUTUBE SITE

Now, wise the HELL UP


Ive never stolen ANYONES work,...........  I retired at age 32,  Im not out to SHAFT ANYONES HARD WORK

Get that son? !




Take your conspiracy crap down the road.  Got that?     YES, my book IS FREE,  I am NOT SELLING ANYTHING


And I sure as hell am not stealing ANYONES WORK.


I sent off links to HIS VIDEOS trying to HELP TINMAN,      maybe they can BUY HIS PROOF OF DESIGN FROM HIM.


Take off your tinfoil hat boy,  You DONT KNOW ME


and dont EVER accuse me of being out to steal anyones HARD WORK


Got that boy?

[TheoriaApophasis]

    If a SPHERE MAGNET is placed ON A MAGNET is has a PRECISE angle, due to gyromagnetic precession.    Its IN the book.
I said on a metal plate (should have additionally specified ferrous so I didn't get a smart remark about it not being attracted at all on copper/aluminum etc) 

I know, I was referring to another method, ON a magnet.

Ya actually it is.  Inside a ring magnet, the a separate magnet will be south-up if the ring is is north-up just like attaching a magnet to the outside.... the mating magnet will be south-up.

Ya actually, no.......you "dont get it",    EVERY SIDE TO EVERY MAGNET on earth has 2 fields, (both magnetic, as driven by dielectricity), centrifugal, and centripetal.

N and S are also ultimately meaningless polarized = spatial, = human perceptualizations of "N and S",  reciprocal field conjugation has neither "S nor N" "poles" reductively.

that "center" you speak of can be seen with magnetic viewing film, its the dielectric inertial plane.



So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients
   

N pole is moving centrifugally CW and centripetally CCW
S pole is moving centrifugally CCW, and centripetally CW




From the illustrations below: We have, at picture 1, the "magnetic" disk resting against gravity in parallel to the dielectric plane
of the large 2x2x1" magnet, whose dielectric inertial plane is illustrated in green. In picture 2 we have the steel disk sitting (it almost
will rest on its knife edge) perpendicular to the dielectric, which is the only low torque position in line with the magnetic circular
induction, marked in red. In fact, even using a magnet twice this size, and many 100s of times the weight of the steel disk, the torque
of the steel disk along the dielectric will move the magnet to keep a perfect perpendicular; the same is true in reverse for the disk
"magnet" in parallel to the dielectric of the block. The steel disk is magnetized, is a magnetically induced disk in whole, whereas the
block and disk in picture one are electrified, are "magnets" only conventionally but are in fact dielectric objects in near-whole, and sodeemed
"magnets" because the magnetic 'part' is spatial and the near-whole, dielectric, is counterspatial and radial. This is magnetodielectric
momentum; identical to gyroscopic inertia, however here we have dielectrical centripetal inertia and circular magnetic
inertia expanding along the Z-axis (see diagrams of magnetism in other sections of this article). Massive confusion exists that this is
the "boundary wall, domain wall, Bloch wall" of a magnet, it is not, it is the primary mover of the magnetism, having been electrified,
it is the dielectric inertial plane. Breaking the magnet will cause an immediate (faster than light) creation of a new self-centering
dielectric plane. As per figure 1 I can place the brick magnet on a 500 pound refrigerator and not making contact with the tiny fewgrams
disk magnet, twist it from parallel against the dielectric plane against the brick magnet and make the 500 pound refrigerator
shake resultantly there is so much dielectric torque at play. This among many other experiments is proof that dielectricity is at play in
any magnet as primary, and magnetism itself as merely an attributional secondary. You certainly could not cause such a reaction by
way of magnetism alone from the disk magnet to the 500-pound object, that would be impossible; only by means of dielectric torque.

[ramset]

Avoid the very appearance of evil and no one will accuse you


""I called my very Rich friends and sent them your work because I'm such a helpy kinda guy..


I retired at twelve because I'm sucha helpy guy that peeps just send me money....""




where I come from we just call it respect....


its a manly thing....




your posting such large pics that its making me sleepy running back and forth to read the page


Maybe one of your zillion PDFs and Books will teach you how to post on a forum [I personally don't know how myself]
Nightey night...........

[TheoriaApophasis]

No, it's back to school for you. 

Gravock

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOZlAejTMYk


You DEMENTED DEMON,    he says in that video, the same damn thing I DO at 32 seconds in.     ROFL


However he is only witnessing the CENTRIFUGAL movement, NOT the centripetal.

Yes, you are officially drunk and/or insane      

Look at HIS diagram below in HIS video, its just a CRUDE example of what I have already said.


You son, are bat guano insane.