Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 37 Guests are viewing this topic.

gravityblock

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on July 21, 2014, 12:53:42 AM

Demented child...........  EACH "side" OF EVERY MAGNET ON EARTH HAS TWO vortex movements,  ONE centrifugal, and ONE centripetal


So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients
   

Which side is moving which direction?!!!

N pole is moving centrifugally CW and centripetally CCW

S pole is moving centrifugally CCW, and centripetally CW




back to school with you.

No, it's back to school for you.  Duel Counter Rotating Homopolar Motor (Magnetic Vortex Motor - Part 4)!  This video clearly shows the conductive discs moving in opposite directions over opposite poles and not in the same rotation direction as you and TinMan wrongly and falsely asserts.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: ramset on July 21, 2014, 01:12:31 AM
So you send off a mans work to Investors and business men
with out even asking him??


In CASE YOU DIDNT NOTICE SON,  his videos are on an OPEN INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC YOUTUBE SITE

Now, wise the HELL UP



Ive never stolen ANYONES work,...........  I retired at age 32,  Im not out to SHAFT ANYONES HARD WORK

Get that son? !




Take your conspiracy crap down the road.  Got that?     YES, my book IS FREE,  I am NOT SELLING ANYTHING


And I sure as hell am not stealing ANYONES WORK.


I sent off links to HIS VIDEOS trying to HELP TINMAN,      maybe they can BUY HIS PROOF OF DESIGN FROM HIM.


Take off your tinfoil hat boy,  You DONT KNOW ME


and dont EVER accuse me of being out to steal anyones HARD WORK


Got that boy?

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: d3x0r on July 21, 2014, 01:18:19 AM
    If a SPHERE MAGNET is placed ON A MAGNET is has a PRECISE angle, due to gyromagnetic precession.    Its IN the book.
I said on a metal plate (should have additionally specified ferrous so I didn't get a smart remark about it not being attracted at all on copper/aluminum etc) 


I know, I was referring to another method, ON a magnet.


Quote from: d3x0r on July 21, 2014, 01:18:19 AM
Ya actually it is.  Inside a ring magnet, the a separate magnet will be south-up if the ring is is north-up just like attaching a magnet to the outside.... the mating magnet will be south-up.


Ya actually, no.......you "dont get it",    EVERY SIDE TO EVERY MAGNET on earth has 2 fields, (both magnetic, as driven by dielectricity), centrifugal, and centripetal.

N and S are also ultimately meaningless polarized = spatial, = human perceptualizations of "N and S",  reciprocal field conjugation has neither "S nor N" "poles" reductively.

that "center" you speak of can be seen with magnetic viewing film, its the dielectric inertial plane.



So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients
   

N pole is moving centrifugally CW and centripetally CCW
S pole is moving centrifugally CCW, and centripetally CW




From the illustrations below: We have, at picture 1, the "magnetic" disk resting against gravity in parallel to the dielectric plane
of the large 2x2x1" magnet, whose dielectric inertial plane is illustrated in green. In picture 2 we have the steel disk sitting (it almost
will rest on its knife edge) perpendicular to the dielectric, which is the only low torque position in line with the magnetic circular
induction, marked in red. In fact, even using a magnet twice this size, and many 100s of times the weight of the steel disk, the torque
of the steel disk along the dielectric will move the magnet to keep a perfect perpendicular; the same is true in reverse for the disk
"magnet" in parallel to the dielectric of the block. The steel disk is magnetized, is a magnetically induced disk in whole, whereas the
block and disk in picture one are electrified, are "magnets" only conventionally but are in fact dielectric objects in near-whole, and sodeemed
"magnets" because the magnetic 'part' is spatial and the near-whole, dielectric, is counterspatial and radial. This is magnetodielectric
momentum; identical to gyroscopic inertia, however here we have dielectrical centripetal inertia and circular magnetic
inertia expanding along the Z-axis (see diagrams of magnetism in other sections of this article). Massive confusion exists that this is
the "boundary wall, domain wall, Bloch wall" of a magnet, it is not, it is the primary mover of the magnetism, having been electrified,
it is the dielectric inertial plane. Breaking the magnet will cause an immediate (faster than light) creation of a new self-centering
dielectric plane. As per figure 1 I can place the brick magnet on a 500 pound refrigerator and not making contact with the tiny fewgrams
disk magnet, twist it from parallel against the dielectric plane against the brick magnet and make the 500 pound refrigerator
shake resultantly there is so much dielectric torque at play. This among many other experiments is proof that dielectricity is at play in
any magnet as primary, and magnetism itself as merely an attributional secondary. You certainly could not cause such a reaction by
way of magnetism alone from the disk magnet to the 500-pound object, that would be impossible; only by means of dielectric torque.



ramset

Avoid the very appearance of evil and no one will accuse you


""I called my very Rich friends and sent them your work because I'm such a helpy kinda guy..


I retired at twelve because I'm sucha helpy guy that peeps just send me money....""




where I come from we just call it respect....


its a manly thing....




your posting such large pics that its making me sleepy running back and forth to read the page


Maybe one of your zillion PDFs and Books will teach you how to post on a forum [I personally don't know how myself]
Nightey night...........
Whats for yah ne're go bye yah
Thanks Grandma

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: gravityblock on July 21, 2014, 01:24:46 AM
No, it's back to school for you. 

Gravock

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOZlAejTMYk


You DEMENTED DEMON,  ;D  ;D he says in that video, the same damn thing I DO at 32 seconds in.     ROFL


However he is only witnessing the CENTRIFUGAL movement, NOT the centripetal.

Yes, you are officially drunk and/or insane   ;D  ;D  ;D

Look at HIS diagram below in HIS video, its just a CRUDE example of what I have already said.


You son, are bat guano insane.     ;D  ;D