Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

"Dielectricity", as used in these "definitions",  is so much word salad. Take any one of those statements and break it down into its component parts -- they are all nonsense. Take any of those statements and use them to derive a mathematical relationship among measurable variables and then construct an experiment to demonstrate the accuracy of that derived relationship.... you cannot, because they are all just meaningless word salad. The statements are even contradictory in themselves.

Dielectricity is counterspace.
But Dielectricity is a "versor".
But Dielectricity is a membrane.
But Dielectricity is a point.
But Dielectricity is radial.
But Dielectricity is a causation.
But Dielectricity is the Ether under torsion.
But Dielectricity is centripetal... but divergent.
Etc etc.

"Dielectricity" as the term is used above is a bunch of self-contradictory nonsense, demonstrated in the statements above.

As the INEPT SUBHUMAN ASSHOLE and knuckle dragging APE THAT YOU ARE..........



I suggest you ASK YOUR WORTHLESS ASS one question........


"why do all the GREATS, ............. faraday, steinmetz, Tesla, Heaviside, JC Maxwell" ......speak A LOT ........


A FUCKING GODDAMN LOT ABOUT DIELECTRICITY




"Magnetism is the dielectric field" – Michael Faraday.





youre nothing but a subhuman gonad scratching CHIMP, intellectually.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yeah but the problem is that there is no ether.

BASELESS CLAIM AND STATEMENT FROM A SUBHUMAN GODDAMN HALF-WIT.


Modern BULLSHIT "science" also posits the ETHER


except theyre calling it  "QUANTUM FLUID"   

There is just the impedance of free space. 

Fucking idiot, SPACE is nothing, it is not a FORCE , not a FIELD


it acts on nothing

it does nothing

it impedes nothing


its the byproduct of centrifugal transverse phenomena and magnetic  "dielectric fields"- FARADAY


IDIOT 

They even have a value for the impedance of free space, it's 376.72 ohms.

Thats the impedance of the Ether under transverse perturbation....


MORON 

[TheoriaApophasis]

    Well now I know what dielectricity is. Kenny doesn't think there are electrons so how
does he get round a relatively simple experiment such as Millicans oil drop experiment
which not only establishes the charge of the non existent electron but also it's mass?
              John.

A: you THINK or SAY that I HAVE said "electrons dont exist"

but its not just I , but the GREATS AS WELL,  idiot.




B: Total fucking bullshit, there is not a single quantification of an "electron weight"     DOES NOT EXIST 




The "GREATS" on the so-called "electron particle" (BS):



Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. He disagrees with the accepted atomic theory of matter, and does not believe in the existence of an "electron" as pictured by science.
"To account for its apparently small mass, science conceives of the electron as a hollow sphere, a sort of bubble, such a bubble could exist in a medium as a gas or liquid because its internal pressure is not altered by deformation. But if, as supposed, the internal pressure of an electron is due to the repulsion of electric masses, the slightest conceivable deformation must result in the destruction of the bubble! Just to mention another improbability..." - Nikola Tesla
Article: "A Famous Prophet of Science Looks into the Future" (Popular Science Monthly)


"My ideas regarding the electron are at variance with those generally entertained. I hold that it is a relatively large entity carrying a surface charge and is not an elementary unit (particle). When the 'electron' leaves an electrode of high potential and in a high vacuum it carries an electrostatic charge many times greater than normal." – N. Tesla



      "In the theoretical treatment of these electrons we are faced with the difficulty that electro-dynamic theory by itself is unable to give an account of their nature." "For since electrical masses constituting the electron would necessarily be scattered under the influence of their mutual repulsions, unless there are forces of another kind operating between them the nature of which has hitherto remained obscure to us." - Einstein on electrons; "Relativity", by Albert Einstein, Random House Publisher, 1916

     "To describe an electron as a negatively charged body is equivalent to saying that it is an expanding-contracting particle. There is no such condition in nature as a negative charge, nor are there negatively charged particles. Charge and discharge are opposite conditions, as filling and emptying, or compressing and expanding are opposite conditions." – W. Russell

     Thomson developed the "Ether Atom" ideas of M. Faraday into his "Electronic Corpuscle", this indivisible unit. One corpuscle terminates on one Faradic tube of force, and this quantifies as one Coulomb. This corpuscle is not and electron, it is a constituent of what today is known incorrectly as an "electron". (Thomson relates 1000 corpuscles per electron) In this view, that taken by W. Crookes, J.J. Thomson, and N. Tesla, the cathode ray is not electrons, but in actuality corpuscles of the Ether." – E. Dollard


     "There is no rest mass to an 'electron'. It is given here the 'electron' is no more than a broken loose "hold fast" under the grip of the tensions within the dielectric lines of force. They are the broken ends of the split in half package of spaghetti. Obviously this reasoning is not welcome in the realm of Einstein's Theory of Relativity." – E. Dollard

     "Unfortunately to a large extent in dealing with dielectric fields the prehistoric conception of the electro-static charge, the 'electron', on the conductor still exists, and by its use destroys the analogy between the two components of the electric field, the magnetic and dielectric. This makes the consideration of dielectric fields unnecessarily complicated" - C.P. Steinmetz (Electric Discharges, Waves and Impulses)


     The idea of electricity as a flow of 'electrons' in a conductor was regarded by Oliver Heaviside as "a psychosis". This encouraged Heaviside to begin a series of writings

    Also consider the J.J. Thomson concept of the "electron" (his own discovery). Thomson considered the electron the terminal end of one unit line of dielectric induction.


     "Electrons as a separate, distinct entity...doesn't really exist, they are merely bumps in something called a 'field'."  - Dr. Steve Biller




     You cannot say that stretching a trillion rubber bands nailed to the floor and releasing them or breaking their "force lines" is the "flow of electrons"; discharge is a terminal movement in systems of inductance or dielectric capacitance.  There are no discrete particles in the universe and certainly none that mediate charges, discharges, magnetism, electromagnetism, gravity, and radiation, only fields, all modalities of the Ether. The so-called 'electrons' are not particles, not objects or subjects but are the dynamic principle of discharge, and are certainly not charge-carriers, fields are not particles, are not "electrons", nor assuredly are there energy discharges in the vacuum of space involving 'electrons'; the 'electron' is a fiction of fallacious observation and an even more faulty mental acuity, spawned naturally from the minds of materialists, or an Atomist. Electricity is Ether in a state of dynamic polarization; magnetism is Ether in a state of dynamic circular polarization upon itself, is the radiative termination of electrical discharge; dielectricity is the Ether under stress or strain. The motions and strains of the Ether give rise to electrification. Phi times Psi gives Q; 'electrons' do not mediate these electrical and magnetic forces or their likewise the Ether fields.   



Anyone who thinks particles are flowing thru a wire has a mental DEFECT.





This Electron = Particle bullshit is nothing more than Greek ATOMISM.      The universe is NOT a giant sea of tiny pool balls rolling and banging and spinning.

[TheoriaApophasis]

So, which velocity do you want to solve for?

youre a BRAIN DEAD FOOL


all velocity is a mark of the FORCE applied and the RATE OF INDUCTION in capacitance of the MEDIUM of TRANSMISSION



its just that simple,  IDIOT.



There ABOVE is 500 pages of "science" reduced to ONE SENTENCE OF SIMPLEX FACT. 





Likewise, current idiot "science" confuses MOTION (= FORCE) with ACCELERATION (=COUNTERSPACE / INERTIA)


the two are WHOLLY SEPARATE ENTITIES



But, being a brainwashed idiot,  such things are BEYOND YOUR (ape) MIND. 

[TheoriaApophasis]

The fact that kenny has declared:'hey chaps,this is how it is,go fuck yourselves' makes me wonder about motive.

Yes, motives.     Hmmmmmmmmm


I have nothing for sale, and the book is FREE



Motives???  Hmm, 


S..E...X......?  NO

Money....??   NO

Fame.......  NO (otherwise id be NICE to you mentally deranged stupid idiots,  ie "diplomatic")





Let me clue you in on some of what youd call  "ancient shit"


These old assholes, called the Pythagoreans and Platonists held that --------


1. life is short
2. fame and $$$$$ and glory are fleeting shadows


and that  3. WISDOM is its own reward and eternally 'transferable' (in your simplex language)




Being an EXISTENTIALIST WORM, ........such a "motive" is beyond your comprehension.