Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Surely you remember that.

obviously he doesnt



He can look here for much on same RE: dielectric inertia....... (however I wont give him the honor of the page number)

Maybe he can read it (for the first time ever)

[tinman]

MileHigh & TK.
No one will ever match your comedy-thats for sure. Never laughed this hard for some time now-copy-pastergasm MH Odd thing is,most of it(the comedy)is based around facts,wich makes it even better lol.

I was going to ask if the bloch wall was going to come into this sooner or later,but i see that's been replaced with spider gear's

[tinman]

@Tinselkoala......
I realize that you have got miffed and may be in plan B of now engaging in a War Of Words. However.....

During the late 1800s there was widespread belief in the physics community that inertia and momentum (and even,you know, gravity  ) was explained by electric and magnetic field actions and reactions. It was variously described as electric inertia, magnetic inertia, electromagnetic inertia, whatever.   

Surely you remember that.


CANGAS 53

Well there was the Feynmans paradox i guess.
A superconducting solenoid is mounted on a plastic disc that is free to rotate on a frictionless axle. Around the periphery of the disc are embedded small, charged spheres. A constant current initially circulates in the solenoid. The disc is initially at rest. There is a magnetostatic field.

As the solenoid temperature rises toward room temperature, the coil loses its superconductivity. At some temperature the current begins to drop toward zero. dB/dt is nonzero as the current drops, and a circulating E field is induced. Each charged ball experiences a tangential electric force. There is a nonzero torque, and the disc begins to rotate.

According to Feynman, here is the paradox: the initial angular momentum is supposedly zero, and hence the final angular momentum should also be zero.

Yes-a copy-pastergasm.

[tinman]

TA
Most of what you present is theory,or your belief's(as you stated in a previous post).
But your thread is titled :Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex

Where is this ultimate proof of this magnetic vortex-i see only thought's(your own book's) and theories.

Question-Is this vortex stationary,or dose it rotate/in motion ?.

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA
Most of what you present is theory,or your belief's(as you stated in a previous post).
But your thread is titled :Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex

Where is this ultimate proof of this magnetic vortex-i see only thought's(your own book's) and theories.

Question-Is this vortex stationary,or dose it rotate/in motion ?.

I answer all of that IN the book, which you obviously never read.



As for what you think is a "Bloch wall", that, Sir, IS what is "driving" every magnet


Do you even know how a "magnet" is created?   dumped charged capacitor banks spin up in geometric magneto-dielectric incommensurability the magnetic and dielectric fields to MAKE the specific geometry.


As a crude analogy, that "bloch wall" is the dielectric 'flywheel' that is powering the macro-magnetic phenomena that people think makes it "a magnet"


What YOU or ANYONE thinks you "know" about the so-called Bloch wall (and you will find VERY little on this 'out there') is both nonsense, rubbish, and 100% incomplete.

its a powerful and CHARGED dielectric object with ATTRIBUTIONAL magnetic field reciprocation.


I have proof after proof, another 40 pages to add, 7 diff. physical demonstrations of same.

Do you even OWN a magnetometer? have you ever measured WHAT or why the Gauss reading in EXTREMELY high on the edge, and also HIGH at the dead center?   and LOW in the intermediate?


I have an invention however I have only shown 4 people that gives about a 20+ second demonstration window of a genuine tornado-like vortex over any magnet.
A patent lawyer I used before has been contacted and I meet next week.

That 8th device, my invention, you will not see, because nothing like it exists, and I am going to patent it.


Believe that, fine, dont believe it, I also dont care.


As stated, I have NO interest in converting or convincing ANYONE of anything.


Lux et Veritas