Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[MileHigh]

Theora,

Your book is a copy-pasteagasm.  It's a new word I just invented.  You wrote the book but you can't say anything, only point to your book?  ha ha

SeaMonkey:

You are getting a raging pulseon.

MileHigh

[SeaMonkey]

SeaMonkey:

You are getting a raging pulseon.

MileHigh

Aye, isn't it beautiful?

Do I sense a bit of envy in your tone?

I suppose you're wishing you had one too...

[TinselKoala]

I nowhere made any such claim of doing so.


I am not part of the "free energy" crowd of fools and nut jobs, and genuine overunity is impossible.   One might get "overunity" by drawing enormous power from natural sourced, but thats just "free movement" coupling.

I never mention free energy, or alternative energy, or overunity etc etc.

Look up at the top of your computer screen. Can you read? What is the name of this forum?

Kiss kiss, sweetheart.

[TinselKoala]

I refer to electrical engineering texts referring to dielectricity as "electrical inertia"

JC Maxwell says the same thing.   So does Oliver Heaviside.


Heard of them, (i assume)?

Can you cite a proper reference that supports this contention? Go ahead, you can do it if you try.  Show exactly where Maxwell and Heaviside say that dielectricty is electrical inertia. Or cite properly an electrical engineering text.

[CANGAS]

@Tinselkoala......
I realize that you have got miffed and may be in plan B of now engaging in a War Of Words. However.....

During the late 1800s there was widespread belief in the physics community that inertia and momentum (and even,you know, gravity  ) was explained by electric and magnetic field actions and reactions. It was variously described as electric inertia, magnetic inertia, electromagnetic inertia, whatever.   

Surely you remember that.


CANGAS 53