Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

For a photon,the inertial plane moves up and down the wave of electromagnetism.the inertial plane is where the 3rd field oscillates in sync with the electrical and magnetic fields.this will give complete 3-dimensions to stationary photons(ie.matter,photons tied up by gravity and vanderwaals) because of the lines where the 3 fields interact to produce a border will be perceptible(?)

[profitis]

Here's the Wise One's take on the mysterious 3rd field called ether:

"There are 500 million neutrinos to each photon and are found in a 1 centimetre cube of space time around each photon ! No point shouting up theories or rubbish about neutrons hahahah a neutrino is a constant equal to all the atomic mass in the universe so there is a lot of them around hahaha The interesting connection to the ether is only observed  at the very first stage of the big bang this is where the either is formed as an ether bubble. This bubble is in fact nothing a moment of nothing can never be something again unless created. To measure the either bubble you must create one it is a bubble that when formed in water will never reach the surface and will collapse back to nothing .

It is thought that a neutrino is a bubble in space time by it has mass and is confirmed as a plank level quantum entangled particle it will have some super natural abilities like being in two or more points in space and time at the same time. A faster than light neutrino is also confirmed and affects time not space .

So lets be all on the correct path as re the either it is a bubble of nothing and is confirmed by the true nature that before something there had to be nothing so put the either there and leave it there ! An either as a gas of what ? nothing than how can it be something ?? It could be said that nothing exists at the edge of the expanding universe and is where nothing belongs ! Go to the edge and fill up a jar with nothing and bring it back open it and everything in the universe will want to enter into to it. Its nothing will very quickly return back to the edge of the universe where nothing belongs hahaha

You can never have something before nothing and you can never have nothing without something hahahah its the cosmic joker a super natural balance ! Now view the electron as a single electron that all mass is sharing than see all particles in the same way and the so called big bang is only a tiny bang that shows up as a very large bang. IT TAKES A LOT OF TIME TO MAKE SOMETHING OUT OF NOTHING and is the only component of nothing so nothing = time x infinity = one tiny electron that produces waves that make photons and photons make neutrinos ! Just because super nova emit lots of neutrinos or the suns reactor makes them does not mean you need an atom to make them...

Regards 93rd atom 1 atommix king monkey"   

[minnie]

   I've been trying to keep this thing alive, takes some doi' though.
The thing I really want to know is "was Einsetin really an idiot?"
   As far as I can see electrons are pretty much what most folk these
days think they are.
  Somewhere TA. was comparing Tesla and Edison, well the tables
could be turning a bit with the adoption of Ultra High Voltage DC.
transmission. The technology is difficult but I can see the benefit
for making the most of renewables where distance and underwater
cables are used. Edison's company also developed a battery that
was able to withstand the rigours of the mining industry. Did Dr.Tesla
ever do anything "idiotic?"
   I reckon a hydrogen atom is a pretty perturbed thing, I can remember
a wizard explosion in the chem lab when I was at school.

[profitis]

" I reckon a hydrogen atom is a pretty perturbed
thing, I can remember
a wizard explosion in the chem lab when I was at
school."

So let's recap.what have we learned from this thread sofar .. 1) matter appears to be two fields that stick and repell in various proportion. 2) non-matter appears to be a 3rd field that manipulates or is manipulated by the other two matter fields,

We're getting somewhere..

[minnie]

  In the news is an article on Mars's loss of atmosphere.
  That got me looking at solar wind which wouldn't exist
  if there were no particles.
     Ken tries to look at things with a cheapo infra-red
  camera and the like, not the best sort of science.
     What he ought to do is turn to the Earth and show
  his ideas with relation to Earth's magnetic field, much
  more chance than with tiny optical gadgets. Then we
  might be able to understand a bit better?