Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[profitis]

"That got me looking at solar wind which wouldn't exist
  if there were no particles."

You've got to let go of this idea of particles my child.look at the closest photo's of single atoms,just fields that's all .anti-fields,pro-fields.anti-what fields, I interject.pro-what fields,again I interject.

 Ken tries to look at things as an entirety,the big picture.this is the best approach to the small picture.

"Not the best sort of science."

But its the only sort of science.what other science is there

[profitis]

Its time to start talking about why these 3 fields of existence move each other around.why they go through continuous cycles of compression and decompression on the universal scale and on the atomic and subatomic scales

[profitis]

Its time to start asking if these 3 fields are perhaps one and the same field folded up on itself.if this is the case,what does it mean 'to fold'.its time to ask the BIG QUESTION folks..the big question:'are the two fields,the anti and the pro fields of matter,are they conserved everywhere,everytime

[minnie]

  Are you saying that I'm looking in altogether the wrong place?
  What do you think of John Wheeler's ideas?
  Magnetism seems to me to be just reciprocal,and most of it
  we encounter is driven by something or other.
  The electron is magnetism?
  It's futile trying to image an actual magnetic field with light
  (photons) and iron because we all know what happens then.
   What I need is a good simple description of counterspace.

[profitis]

" Are you saying that I'm looking in altogether the wrong place?"

who's the expert on perception?try get a grip on the picture without interference of time-space son because time-space,,time-space= to mean something.let go of all meaning and what do you now see,what do you feel,sense(not compute)..ping! I just flicked a fly off your spectacles.perturbance/disturbance is all that remains after photographs/memory/logic vanish ie. all meaning are erased from existence.do photographs help us? They must because photographs must be part and parcel of the sequence of the system,NOT seperate from it.so we are going to do the following in order to tackle this riddle,,we are going to remove the idea of 'bending' time and space because time-space are the semantics of perturbance rather than having any effect on perturbance.how can they say that we can bend time/space with perturbance yet we cannot bend perturbance with time/space?its because perturbance is the only real in the greater picture. If I do something quickly does the clock go any quicker?nope.a photo of you and your girlfrend will not affect your relationship with you and your girlfrend(unless its not her in the pic ofcors)

"What do you think of John Wheeler's ideas?"

crazy,but his craziness is still less crazy than the next Barty Mcfly chasing the next invented or imagined pro or anti fieldball and wasting YOUR tax-money to do so.this is like a dog chasing not only its own tail but your tail too(!)
 
"Magnetism seems to me to be just reciprocal,and most of it
  we encounter is driven by something or other."

This is my hypothesis,in matter,these two opposing fields are either mixedup to shit (eg.lump of iron) OR they are alligned/ anti-alligned (magnet,quark,positron whatever its all the same thing relative to the 3rd field really).the line between alligned and anti-alligned is where this 3rd invisible field(non-matter/nothingness) presses greatest upon these other two fields.
 
"The electron is magnetism?"

The electron field is countermagnetic field.again we encounter the classic pro/anti duality of all matter's fields.
 
" It's futile trying to image an actual magnetic field with light
  (photons) and iron because we all know what happens then."

Perturbance yes.can't escape it.cannot escape it.can only try to get real with it,try.have to cross-examine ourselves most of the time for this
 
"What I need is a good simple description of counterspace."

Counter point-of-perturbance-within-two-fields can only be one more field,a 3rd field.nothingness vs somethingness are simply a borderline of fields in our case