Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[AlienGrey]

Hmm! but can you afford the bus fair down to Golders Green London where Atoms garden shed is their Atom can control things hide the 'Nov 5th Banger's and also film it to show the rest of us ? The plasma ball should warm things up a bit (is it like a Foo Fighter, might need a fire fighter while it's done ) though, Sounds like an excerpt from Denis the Menace to me.

[AlienGrey]

MR gray !

Get passed the I am so blind I cant see further than your nose nonsense ! You know perfectly well what I mean ! And I do not wish to detail the laser ...

I have one of these transformers in fact I have 3 different types but they are all very dangerous in the wrong hands like the hands of men that have a taste for guns ect ect ect .....

Its not just what you can do with them its what can happen to them over a period of time ! All these coil type generators are the same in that way and its to late now as they are soon to be everywhere ....

Would you like a device that you can point at water and the water explodes ? Salt water will just combust and you can shot down a passenger airline with it ? No ! Down the road from me there was 2 Islamic terrorists who had a bomb factory in there kitchen ! They were a second phase after 7/11 here in the UK ...

when you can fully adjust HZ to infinity and amps and volts the power laser gets smaller and smaller ..... ! The road ahead with this is going to be a hard pill to swallow !....... And the OU will soon be promoting them like sweats in a shop but there already on the net and its not coming with a warning like the one I am giving it .

This is a very lethal technology ............... far worse than a machine gun or a 1000 pound bomb !!! its very bad shit !!!

Err not me squire the only free energy I'm using is a pile of solar Pannels on me garden shed, don't suppose you know where i can get a 500w one the size of an A4 ? , didn't think so!

[CycleGuy]

@CycleGuy

Yes I know it sounds crazy and I know you cannot think this way and I know even more. This is indeed encouraging because it shows I have to be very careful in the way I am exposing SC. Please remember that we are talking about something that for all intents is counter our present construct so of course there will be 
enormous chasms of counter-logic.

The main basis is this. What you are referring to in most cases are effects of action at a distance. One action occurs at point A and we receive a corresponding action at point B. I one case is your photon. You produce an energy at point A and receive an energy at point B and it is only human nature to think that between points A and B there needs to be a transfer of something for this to occur. Something has to travel from point A to point B for point B to respond.

This is where we have basically decided to complicate our lives to unlimited levels. In SC point A creates an atomic change and point B simply sees that change. It does not need a photon to travel from point A to then tell point B "Hey, something just happening at point A". Point B can see this because its atomic nature permits it to turn towards that energy source that is sees as being a new gravity source. You see that turn as a glitch on your monitor and understand it to be the effect of a traveling signal, a traveling photon, a traveling electron. We as our base nature need to fill in the gaps for things to make sense at our level so for us to abdicate any further correlations, we prefer to keep the invisible travel mode alive.

Even Einstien could not really understand action at a distance (3AD), and it is our inability to understand 3AD that is one main crux in how we work out logical explanations of our effects. Every time a coils pulses and another coil picks up that pulse, automatically there has to be something in between. The field is our automatic response. But what if the copper atoms in the pick up coil have the ability to respond on their own because that it their nature because the atomic make up permits nucleic spin (or slight turning) and what if that turning, as slight as it may be or as extreme as it can be is conveyed from one nucleus in the copper to next nucleus down the line to your monitor showing this wave form. Then there is no more field involved since there is no need for a field to be involved.

You can produce empirical data for every known effect. You can take that data and summarize 3AD as being action A produces a field that sends out its field fingers in all directions and luckily touches point B that responds with a glitch on the monitor. You can take that same effect and understand that point B just sees it without any in between action required. This puts all the responsibility or all the abilities of the effect hence all the onus on the atom itself. This is where we as OUers doing research in electrical effects have been blinded by a field being the cause of our effects. That is were we are going wrong and that is what is holding us back from realizing OU devices.

Unfortunately for me, any construct at this level has to agree with everything else out there and I understand this and accept it only because the final present will be a better understanding of how to produce OU devices, devices which will not resemble our devices of today because we presently build things based on field effects and electron flow and not because the effects are simply seen via SC.

I am not disputing empirical data because that is the cornerstone of our technical prowess, that is to produce effect and measure their reactions. The debate is on how you understand that data. You can decide that the field is in between and live and grow and even prosper. No problem. But there has to be a price to pay if we are wrong and one of those prices we are paying now is living in a world without OU. That price for me is to high and my orientation is to see why we are paying such a high price, and, from what I can see, the construct of our effects is the reason, not the data.

So I will try to respond to your comments in bold and see where that goes.

I started my first draft a few years before but officially on November of 2010. At that time it was a fledgling idea with basic notions that I started to put into real life comparisons using EE on my bench and realizing that what EE says is not exactly the case. During the process, things required fine tuning which I did and put them back into the critical meat grinder, threw away the fat and kept working on the lean parts so today I would say it is 70% ready, but I cannot wait any longer and will put it out soon, complete or incomplete. Why? Because my only real motivation in all of this is to help OUers work their devices better but soon realized this cannot be quarantined to OU alone. Unfortunately this touches everything and because of that, many years have past. More then I wanted.

Our time is running out and if this rock should blow, I need to get this out to as many people as possible so it is in our hands for the next round of man from dark age to technology movement. I really fear a worldwide calamity is about to occur and this will make man start over and if we can start over with SC, this time around the results for man will be better then they are now with this one world crap and organized academic and banking world crime syndicates running the planet like it was an open cash register. I fear that I and most of us will not be here to see it, but for me, it is a chance for the future humans to change their course and work with the atom instead of dreaming with the field. Hmmmmm Not bad, I'll have to keep that last line handy. hahahaha

Maybe one other question for you. If you could eliminate everything notion that is related to action at a distance, how much of present notions of science would disappear? So if that could be replaced with "direct influence" it would not change the science or the data but how many notions would disappear. Then, I would ask, is it better to advance with a backpack weighing 100 pounds or one weighing 10 pounds when both provide the same level of survival? hehehe

One more. If you wanted to control the world, you will quickly realize you need to push the world in the wrong direction so you are the only one smart enough to know everything, would you maybe invent a notion of fictitious fields and electrons and have people believing in this and then just sit back and say "As long as the field and the electron are involved, I know that no one will ever discover or reach OU and therefore, the state of our stranglehold remains secure". Just look at it from all angles man. How can you advance on a need to know basis? You can't. You will just be treading water year after year and you will be no closer to the shore. This is our life right now just treading around in circles dependent on top academia to throw out a few useless bones for us to suck on while we continue treading more.

wattsup

So what you're saying in effect is that the QVZPE field doesn't exist (despite it being known about for 111 years and empirically, experimentally proven many times), that atoms are somehow able to affect each other without any means of transference of energy mediating that transference, and that your hobby theory is merely an offshoot of Wheelerism, but unlike Wheeler having merely stripped out electrons from the universal tally sheet, you've wiped out everything that isn't matter. Therefore, your universe can be proven to be impossible to have ever come into existence by the very rules of your universe that you promote, and couldn't work in any case.

Tell me, what is electromagnetic radiation? Remember, in your universe, there are no massless entities (photons, etc.). So in explaining radiation per the rules of your universe, you'll have to account for all radiation effects without utilizing massless entities.

Why does acoustic radiation (sound) require a medium to mediate it (an atmosphere to transmit the force of the acoustic radiation), whereas in your universe, electromagnetic radiation doesn't require mediation? Or does sound travel through a vacuum in your universe? It must, per the rules of your hobby universe, as nothing is required to mediate energy transfer.

So you've Wheelerized Wheelerism... whereas Wheeler was wrong but attempting to reconcile his hobby theory's universe with reality, you chuck all of reality out the window and simply state that mere assertion of the rules of your universe makes them true.

[CycleGuy]

You have rock atoms at the surface of Earth. During the night all those atoms have their nuclei pointing down to the Earth Core (EC) because they all know that there is one big gravity force some 3000 miles down. At sunrise, those nuclei now see a new gravity source so they start turning towards it but the force is weak so they start oscillating between the EC and the Suns position. At noon, with the sun overhead, the nuclei are really starting to Sway pointing almost upwards then falling back again to EC and this oscillation is so strong that the atoms heat up enough that you can burn your feet or even boil an egg on the rock surface. As the sun now starts its sunset, the nuclei are now in a lower oscillation and things start to cool down and during the night they can rest till tomorrow simply content on looking again at the EC.

Who knew? Clouds are gravity shields. 

[MileHigh]

I think I saw that poster in a head shop in 1973.  It was under a black light.  lol