Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

Opposite spins shown here in this video.
Please remember-we are looking at MY setup.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n358gtR7gr8

Tinman,

As an additional test of any ion "wind" mentioned in my previous post, you might consider reversing polarity on your tank and try generating O2 at the magnet instead.  Keeping track of the magnet polarity, perform the test generating H2 first (with the sides taped for clarity) and then reverse polarity on the tank to produce O2 at the magnet (assuming you can produce sufficient O2 for visualization).  Note what effect the two polarities have regarding the spins observed at the pole piece and when motoring.

PW

[ramset]

ACCA
Thank you for the reminder,  Mark S is a good fellow and quite approachable ...


I think I will give him a ring to see if he has any comments on this [ also to invite his input]


thx
Chet

[Cap-Z-ro]

Just wondering whether a magnet strong enough to be suspended by a ball bearing would free up the magnet enough to spin opposite to the vortex.

Regards...

[picowatt]

Just wondering whether a magnet strong enough to be suspended by a ball bearing would free up the magnet enough to spin opposite to the vortex.

Regards...

If whatever emanates from the poles of a magnet has an actual physical spin as TA depicts, is it unreasonable to expect that two like poles in axial alignment and proximity would cause the magnets to spin?  Fairly easy to test.  If necessary it may also be possible to devise an experiment using open center cylindrical magnets wherein the "centripetal" field/flux is routed through the center of the cylindrical magnets to the opposing pole so that the majority of the flux being tested for rotation involves primarily the more external "centrifugal" flux.

As well, if there are indeed physically rotating fields, it would be reasonable to expect that two magnets placed side by side with their magnetic axes parallel and supported by bearings to rotate when brought into proximity.

If the vortex observed in all these experiments utilizing current flow to generate H2 exist solely as a property of the magnet alone, and not the interaction of electric/ion currents flowing in proximity to the magnet, should not that vortex or spin cause magnets aligned as above to also spin?

With the many attempts made to create PM only motors, why has this spin not yet been observed?

Possibly TA's diagrams refer only to motionless field polarities/vectors emanating to/from the magnetic poles.

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

If necessary it may also be possible to devise an experiment using open center cylindrical magnets wherein the "centripetal" field/flux is routed through the center of the cylindrical magnets to the opposing pole so that the majority of the flux being tested for rotation involves primarily the more external "centrifugal" flux.

PW

Here is the view of ONLY THE CENTRIPETAL (center point ONLY) vortex as filmed thru a pair of optical glass with micron thin FERROFLUID in between , and ringed by LED lights

however even using 2 lights, you can see the same thing


THIS IS CENTRIPETAL IMAGE ONLY pictured below,   NO CENTRIFUGAL IS SHOWN


THEN, I show you BOTH, with a bit of the ringed centriFUGAL  around the centripetal




THEN,  pictured below [as found in the book] BASED UPON MY CALCULATIONS (before seeing these REAL FIELD (not created) IMAGES), IS MY PREDICTION OF THEIR APPEARANCE,......WHICH IS 100% IDENTICAL


Necessitated field INTERLACING..........centrifugal against centripetal, and centripetal against centrifugal   makes this geometry not only "possible"  >>>>> but 100% ABSOLUTELY MANDATORY, necessitated, it cannot exist any other way.   <<<<<<

How do opposite fields "movements" [since movement itself is really a mirage posterior to the field itself]......(this time referring to magnetism only as per CW against CCW, and CCW against CW) conjugate at max velocity with the LOWEST SPATIAL DISTENTION in their mutual reciprocation???  They vortex around and 'thru each other' IN this pattern and ONLY THIS PATTERN

Pressure, anti-spatial (counterspatial) opposite moving distentions (radiations) necessitate (Greeks called this ANANKE) this magneto-spatial geometry.

The key point everyone 'misses' is that magnetism is radiation, is a circular Ether modality, and MUST by its very definition, both in connotation and denotation >>>>>> "create space" <<<<<<<

HOWEVER, circular field reciprocation is EXPRESSED (as it MUST be) by CW and CCW vortex interlacing

Even the vortex itself is a mirage of space and time,     Polarization = space/time = "Space" = radiation.   The "mirage of space" as fields reciprocate upon themselves creates the vortex (while hard to see using normal media) 'painted' upon the canvas of spacetime and as us dumb humans see it with various oddball testing media.