Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

YES, it is a zoomed in image of ONLY the centripetal vortex (however even the very center is still influenced by centrifugal inductive force which still necessitates (only much tighter) this geometry    (until in reaches inside at the midpoint of reintegration).


Its a "dilated" view of the centripetal,  using a RING magnet............So you can see a MUCH BIGGER view of the centripetal of a SOLID disk magnet,  BY HOW.       Simple.........Ring magnet.

its the same AS a disk magnet , only magnified so you can see it better.

Disk magnet you can barely barely see it, because its so small and tight.

TA,

But again, in shot 1827, for example (and in the 1825 I asked about) where does the OD of the magnet end in relation to the pattern portrayed?

In 1827 is the OD (periphery) of the magnet roughly where the intense orange circle is defined at the periphery of the pattern?  Is there a center hole in the magnet?

Similar question for 1825, is this a solid faced magnet or one with a center hole and what are its dimensions/extents in relation to the observed pattern?

A circle or two drawn over the patterns portraying the dimensions of the magnet behind the viewer would be most helpful in understanding what we are looking at and what the patterns portray.

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,
In 1827 is the OD (periphery) of the magnet roughly where the intense orange circle is defined at the periphery of the pattern?  Is there a center hole in the magnet?

Similar question for 1825, is this a solid faced magnet or one with a center hole and what are its dimensions/extents in relation to the observed pattern?

A circle or two drawn over the patterns portraying the dimensions of the magnet behind the viewer would be most helpful in understanding what we are looking at and what the patterns portray.

PW

In 1827 the inside diameter is roughly 36 mm   .....no the intense orange circle is the rim of the INSIDE EDGE of the ring magnet


1824, 1825, 1826 and 1827 are the same magnet

only diff zoom views.

A ring magnet lets you see the dilation OF the centripetal which is normally too small and too tight to view (way too tight).


A ring magnet, obviously and logically, give your a dilation view of the centripetal


You can see BOTH centripetal and centrifugal below :::

both patters are the SAME, both are interlacing resultant, but one is convergent and "tighter" and the other is divergent and more "open"

centripetal is shrinking back into the dielectric, into the counterspatial inertial.      Centrifugal just the opposite.



BOTTOM pic is the pole of a 1/4" cube magnet......, and is showing the centrifugal divergent (=spatially moving [really creating])  ONLY

same pattern, both are opposite in interlacing reciprocations, but incommensurate and identical in geometry, only spatially and counterspatially (moving)  distended or contractive

[TheoriaApophasis]

To clear some things up for some people (not meant for anyone here specifically)...........

[Acca]

 Here is the Flicker photos of Michael Snyder he developed the single axis magnet plasmon viewer..  His YT channel is https://www.youtube.com/user/SirZerp/videos

http://www.aps.org/about/physics-images/archive/heleshaw.cfm

"Anti-Vortex Image in Hele-Shaw Cell
Magnetic fields can be hard to understand or characterize. Two natural means of visualizing magnetic fields are the aurora australis and the aurora borealis, as well as the Sun's corona.
Michael Snyder and others have explored ways to visualize magnetic fields in the lab. The visualization here started with a Hele-Shaw cell. A Hele-Shaw cell is two flat parallel plates separated by a nearly infinitesimal distance. In this case, Snyder's and Frederick's Hele-Shaw cell is made of two 100mm circular glass windows separated by a Fe₃O₄ ferrofluid; that is, a liquid of 10nm particles that becomes strongly magnetized.
The Hele-Shaw cell is facing the camera and illuminated by 36 colored LED lights placed around the cell's perimeter. The light is scattered through the cell as the ferrofluid particles respond to two magnets behind the cell which are aligned north/south and south/north. The magnetization produces this anti-vortex image."

http://www.revolution-labs.com/

https://www.flickr.com/photos/sirzerp/2947536208/in/photostream/lightbox/

I also made ways of making "non-magnetic metals" magnetic.. Sorry can show but not tell !!

Acca..

[picowatt]

A ring magnet lets you see the dilation OF the centripetal which is normally too small and too tight to view (way too tight).

Does not the area of the "centripetal" expand outward as distance from the pole face increases?

That is, should not increasing the distance between the pole face and the viewer cause the view of the 'centripetal" area expand?

And again, how do you justify using magnetic particles to view the fields, when they are merely smaller analogs of more macroscopic iron filings?

PW