Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

tinman

After running another test on the electromagnet-and still geting no spin,i placed a thin weak ring magnet on top of the electromagnets core while the system was running. Straight away there was a very strong spin from the thin ring magnet(which is axially magnetized). Im starting to wonder if the electric field from the electromagnet is stopping the spin effect of the electromagnet some how?. Next to try, an electromagnet with a solid core.

picowatt

TA,

The following quotes were taken from a paragraph on page 20 of your book:

Quote
Instead of 'conservation of energy', it should be called the 'conservation of the Ether'. However all fields are induced or transferred thru to another by the Ether alone, this means that induction cannot occur where the Ether is not, and likewise it means that (Tesla's discovery) inertia and momentum can be discharged by equilibrium with the Ether by a special means of grounding. Meaning a terawatt of power can vanish with no resultant effect, or that you could create a system where a body could decelerate from 1000MPH to 0 with no resultant forwards momentum, friction, or inertia. Contrary to popular belief that "energy cannot be destroyed, only transferred" is a myth.

Can you provide any details regarding an example of, or an experiment that can be performed, wherein even a kilowatt of power can be made to "vanish" with no resultant effect? (or even a single watt for that matter)

Likewise, can you explain how a thrown baseball, or any other moving object, can be immediately decelerated to zero MPH with "no resultant forward momentum, friction or inertia"?

Continuing the quote of that paragraph from your book:

QuoteThis only holds true if induction is possible and natural, energy can indeed be 'lost' completely, as was first discovered in AC generation stations where, before the generators got up to working inertias, enormous power is lost for a short time with no resultant dissipation into our world.

Do you have a link or reference with additional details and context relating to AC generation stations having an enormous power loss during spin-up "with no resultant dissipation into our world"?

Again, continuing that paragraph:

Quote
Ether is the "ultimate" medium (Tesla often interchanged the term "medium" with "Ether") - being a perfect 'fluid' and transporting independent carriers. Tesla said that electromagnetic radiation was propagated, like sound waves in the Ether. GR and QM, the cult of quantum, has merely displaced the Ether as "dark matter" which according to their (likely incorrect) calculations, comprises almost all the universe. Which means in fact, in their myopic misunderstanding, that the remaining few percent of the Universe are merely bundled Ether fields in stable forms (for a while) as plasma, elements, magnetism, gravity, and likewise. Therefore ultimately, of course, all is the Ether.

The above seems to indicate that Tesla considered the Ether a unique entity in and of itself.  That is, a real "thing" thru which radiation propagates, existing independently prior to that propagation.  If, as in the snippet above, EM radiation propagates thru the Ether "like sound waves", this would also infer that the Ether is composed of some "thing" that can be disturbed, and thru which, via these propagating disturbances, EM radiation can propagate.  Is this your understanding?

PW

picowatt

Quote from: tinman on July 26, 2014, 09:15:27 PM
After running another test on the electromagnet-and still geting no spin,i placed a thin weak ring magnet on top of the electromagnets core while the system was running. Straight away there was a very strong spin from the thin ring magnet(which is axially magnetized). Im starting to wonder if the electric field from the electromagnet is stopping the spin effect of the electromagnet some how?. Next to try, an electromagnet with a solid core.

Tinman,

In one of your videos, you attached what you said was a piece of "pipe" to the end of the PM to see if the effect could be extended to the end of the "pipe".  When you said "pipe", I assumed that to be a hollow tube.  If so, you might try repeating that test with solid bar stock.  Insulate the sides of the magnet and bar stock.

If the spin can be created at the end of the bar above, the EM core could be made longer or extended similarly to reduce any effects due to the coil's field. 

The use of a solid core with the EM is a good first thing to test, and as well, try to determine/match the relative strength of the field at the pole of the EM versus that of the PM.  A lift test comparison or similar comes to mind.

PW

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on July 26, 2014, 07:16:53 PM
Sorry, I meant this first question in Farmhand's post:

"Can you show us something useful that this understanding allows you to do that can not be already done ?"



Yes I can,.........WILL I ?    Some yes, on the next edition.


3 of the "BIG ONES"  ?   NO,  ....Why?......  Patent attorney says "hell no!"    ;D ;D

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: TinselKoala on July 26, 2014, 08:22:55 PM
My my. All of that genius, not trying to convince anybody of anything,


I said it before, I will say it AGAIN,    believe whatever you want, Dont care, couldnt care less.


Believe in angels, and pixie dust, and some guy in a hot place with a pitchfork.....  DONT CARE