Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TinselKoala]

Time for the "big reveal" about Ken:

Me: <<< The other thing I noticed is that there is never any care taken when removing the small magnet from the surface of the neo magnet.  It something one would think you should do if you knew what you were doing.>>>

Ken:  <<< I have 2 of those $800  6"  Neos,  I dont give a shit about cracking the plating on it.   Ill buy another, who cares.
been busy experimenting,    what about you?  Gum flapping? >>>

Ha ha ha.... that says it all.  Poor Kenny thinks I am talking about cracking the plating on the neo magnet.  That just proves that after 20 years of self-schooling about magnetism, he still is more clueless than knowledgeable.   The glass is much less than half full.

MileHigh

It's hilarious isn't it? Chess champion, twenty years of studying magnets, Russel and Dollard.... everything we know about magnetism and electricity in general is wrong!

Yet people using "our" model and the grand set of constructs known as Quantum Electrodynamics can design things like high density disk drives for personal computers, they can navigate semiautonomous robot spacecraft and soft-land them on Titan, they can implant electronic devices in the cochleas of deaf persons and restore their hearing. They can even explain color CRTs and what happens when you magnetize them with an external magnet. What can people design and perform using the incoherent gobbledegook found in Apoptosis's insulting rants and silly claims? Rodin coils that produce pretty patterns on magnet viewing film (which he doesn't even understand)?  Yeah, that will get you to Europa, cure your warts and keep you warm in winter. Right.

[d3x0r]

re: Theoria Apophasis part 20

SirZerp Channel list kinda...  He did lots of playing with a ferrocell too; but had 2 color LEDs... alternating color LEDs 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aitgJpy3FWo&list=UUSR-vy_Ue0raYCGMwtw4uqg


Really This seems to be dependant on the direction of the lights... since they're arranges as point sources pointed inward, you get a constant reflection equidistant from each LED... and each being offset forms a separate arc.  Would be interesting to see a row of Linear lights, and maybe 2   X/Y or 3 - a equidistant triangle instead of a circle.

[picowatt]

In this test,i have used a ring magnet from a speaker. Here we can see opposite spins,even though we dont change the voltage polarity,or the magnetic fields.

I have also found that it is the magnetic field that turns my camera off-if i get to close to the magnet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QCCA0rPiS5w&list=UUsLiBC2cL5GsZGLcj2rm-4w

Tinman,

This video appears to be in agreement with the right hand rule.

Using the right hand rule, one would expect the rotation observed on the ID to be opposite to that observed on the OD.

The absolute directions observed for both ID and OD are a bit puzzling.  Most likely this is because we are dealing with ion flow as opposed to electron flow.

However, it may be helpful/interesting if you could verify that any flow or motion of the liquid itself is in the same direction as the bubbles in the immediate vicinity of the magnet.  Rather than pollute your tank with ink or dye, you might try making a wand using small diameter wooden or plastic dowel with a thread attached to the end.  The thread will act as a small flag and by placing it in various locations, you can map out any flow/direction of the electrolyte. 

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kchVZZOvrcs some musings about charged particles and magnetic fields; inspired by toroflux.  Would some oppositely wound keyring models...

Looks just like a toroflux!!!!


EVERYONE HAS TO BUY A TOROFLUX     

http://www.ebay.com/itm/GloFX-Toroflux-Interactive-Sculpture-Toy-Kids-Stuff-Rave-Light-Show-Unisex-/201134561996?pt=US_LED_Light_Key_Chains&hash=item2ed48ddacc


watch em work:::::


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfDi89Hj0QA

[TheoriaApophasis]

seemingly is bearing very little fruit.

Ohh, you mean the mind blowing inventions I have in the background??   Or the book with 400,000 downloads in under 6 weeks.
Or, that, off the scene, some serious heavyweights are buzzing my phone like mad???

Yeah, nothing is going on.    Pedal that stuff down the pike.

I see that you're most pissed (from earlier comments of yours) that Im NOT SELLING ANYTHING,    NOR seek your approval on ANYTHING        LoL

No way.  You filled up those 18 minutes by doing the same thing over and over and over.  You had ample time to explain to your viewers what was going on.  My presumption is that you didn't explain what was going on because you can't.  You are a kid playing with magnets in a sandbox, no more than that.

Kids dont write books, and invent amazing things that impress even crusty ole inventors.    Pedal it down the road.

Yes I was trying to stump you.  Although it's very hard these days because of Google.  You stated "field phones and electromagnet."  What does that mean?  You seem to be saying, "I can go to Radio Shack and buy stuff."   I am not interested in that kind of answer.  I am asking you to explain the underlying process for listening to the magnetic domains flipping and then explain what the basic building blocks are that would allow you to do it.  I want a real answer from you.

No, you wanna play games and engage in Sophistry, too bad for you, Im an expert in the Greek method and their debate dialectic (διαλεκτική).    (thats dialectic,  NOT dielectric)  ROFL

Likewise, I asked you why the circular dark region exists on the monitor when you bring the magnet up close and you have failed to answer the question.  You throw a small word salad at that question and call it "the answer."  I am asking you for the real answer, the real explanation for why the dark region appears on the monitor.  That's one that's probably not so easy to Google and that means you have to show us your own brains in action.  No copy-pasting of some BS word salad - I want to hear the real explanation for why this happens.  I strongly suspect that you are unable to offer up an explanation, which would just confirm what I have been saying about you.

Nope, I answered the question, you just did'nt "approve" of the answer,  big difference son.



There isnt a sophistic tactic you HAVE, that I did'nt master 20 years ago debating Platonic metaphysics and Monistic ontology.