Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

possess the same properties

same quality, not the same quantity.

Using any FERROCELL shows this to be the case,  however weak on the FERRITE

You want a FERROCELL video of this fact???



Dielectric capacitance increase (in creating a magnet from cap banks)  can be achieved (however much much weaker,very loosely, and not-permanently) by magnetic induction.


I can alter AB  by  A, ........or alter AB by  B


nobody wants a B-mod magnet. 

[picowatt]

same quality, not the same quantity.

Using any FERROCELL shows this to be the case,  however weak on the FERRITE

You want a FERROCELL video of this fact???



Dielectric capacitance increase (in creating a magnet from cap banks)  can be achieved (however much much weaker,very loosely, and not-permanently) by magnetic induction.


I can alter AB  by  A, ........or alter AB by  B


nobody wants a B-mod magnet.

Is that a "yes"?

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

Is that a "yes"?

PW

how could you read it otherwise?    obviously.

There is "more than one way to skin a cat"    obviously.


alter maneto-dielectic coherency via CHARGE, or by magnetic induction (which is resultantly WEAK)


magnetic induction ADDS NOTHING, all you have done is rearranged the existing (and then only part of it) inter-atomic magneto-dielectric.   And then only weakly and not permanently.

[d3x0r]

I already said (after looking at the term) that it's a poor term.... it's generally applied as the region between the north and south where the forces are in balance.  if you have 2 magnets... I further described it as it appears on magnetic viewing film as a horizontal field/perpendicular field  As an equilibrium point another magnet can be balanced there so there is equal attraction from the north pole and from the south pole...
Another way to put a magnet at equilibrium is to put a cylinder in the center of a ring with the same poles up... sitting on a flat surface this will be a stable balance. 


Increasing the strength of one side of the other of a magnet will move this equilibrium point (line made up of equal points)

If you take some non magnetized iron and add it to the end of a magnet, the middle isn't the line... it will be biased toward the stronger pole.  And Should probably note that flux lines come out the sides of the magnet, as indicated by the magnetic viewing film having dark areas...
If you have a significantly larger magnet than another mating magnet, it will want to hang on the sides at an angle.... until it's at the equilibrium point (middle is a bad term, because the poles can be of different strength, which will bias the equilibrium away from the middle)
And line is also technicall bad, because it's a gradiant, and not a distinct line-like region.  But it is in general a line.

[TheoriaApophasis]

If you take some non magnetized iron and add it to the end of a magnet, the middle isn't the line... it will be biased toward the stronger pole.  And Should probably note that flux lines come out the sides of the magnet, as indicated by the magnetic viewing film having dark areas...
If you have a significantly larger magnet than another mating magnet, it will want to hang on the sides at an angle.... until it's at the equilibrium point (middle is a bad term, because the poles can be of different strength, which will bias the equilibrium away from the middle)
And line is also technicall bad, because it's a gradiant, and not a distinct line-like region.  But it is in general a line.

hell must have frozen over,  someone finally saying something sensible, logical, and accurate.   


(not meaning that nobody else has).