Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
To answer your questions:
I am assuming that you are talking about two bar magnets in attraction.  There never was any boundary in the first place so there is no shifting.

SORRY, I SAID ANSWER.........not baseless statement. 


Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
.  Around the center of the bar there is a Bloch wall but the magnetic fields in the center are almost nonexistent there because of the flux cancellation.  So I suppose you could say that there is a very weak Bloch wall there.

Sorry, no descriptions ALLOWED,  only EXPLANATIONS (you have none)


Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
Forget about the fantastical term "pressure gradients."  The real variables are the flux density and the total amount of magnetic flux.  With the [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N] setup, the two fluxes essentially cancel each other out in the iron bar.  You actually would have to precisely match the flux contribution from either magnet to actually have a Bloch wall in the center of the iron bar.  A slight excess of flux from one magnet over the other would move the Bloch wall further away from the stronger flux source.


FLUX of what moron?    Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*Fields *~*


What bloch wall? (DIELECTRIC INERTIAL PLANE) ........1 PAGE AGO YOU SAID IT DIDN'T EXIST    ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D  ;D

You said one thing only 12 hours ago, NOW something wholly different!!!   

Asked you 20 pages ago to define FIELD, ......since they have NOTHING to do with particles, you are afraid of that word.


Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
If you are referring to [N----S] [iron bar] [S---N] then there is almost zero attraction if you do an imaginary slice through the iron bar where the Bloch wall is located.

LOCATED?   I never said it was LOCATED THERE dummy,  I said it was CONCENTRATED THERE due to magneto-dielectric mutual repulsion in a conjugate binding system

CONCENTRATED AT   is not  =   LOCATED AT     .   pathetic.



Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
No net flux means there is no attraction.   On the other hand, if you do an imaginary slice through this [N---S] then there is "attraction" inside the magnet.

You cannot do ANY kind of slice, and "find" either magnetism NOR the dielectric inertial plane moron, they are FIELDS,..........FIELDS ARE NOT found in particles NOR "slices"

ROFL!!! 

Here, have an imaginary slice of mud pie.



Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
The polarization comes from the fact that the outer electrons

Electrons dont exist, and FIELDS are not particles............EVEN THE INSANE idiots in Quantum dont claim fields are particles   ROFL !!!!! My goodness, you're so gnorant. 


Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
act as current loops and they are all moving in the same direction.  Therefore the current loops have magnetic moments

Current loops eh?  That would require you to DEFINE A FIELD, which contain no particles,   Pathetic .


Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
Moving point charge -> magnetic field

Magnetism doesnt move in a circle, moron, it moves in a pair of reciprocating vortex , convergent and divergent.

You cannot define  the word FIELD, as such, you cannot employ it. 



Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
That's really the foundation of it all.  It's all just trillions and trillions of little magnetic dipoles adding together.

Sorry, asshole, but magnetism is (as Maxwell, and Tesla, and Faraday state) the BYPRODUCT, the radiation, the "FIELD OF DIELECTRICITY"

But, I guess you think yourself wiser than then?   ROFL !!!


Magnetism is a DISCHARGE, you fucking idiot,       Ever heard of "electricity TERMINATING as/into MAGNETISM"  ??????????   
   Guess what is "dumping" / radiating MAGNETISM????  Thats right dummy, Dielectricity.



Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
There is no "dielectric inertial plane" for a single electron moving in a circle.  Therefore, there is no "dielectric inertial plane" for a magnet.

Nice claim, try again.    Bullshit not accepted here.   

This is all that there really is:  a moving point charge creates a magnetic field.


Points dont exist moron, you have to make a line to make a point, and you have to make a point to draw a line. 

POINTS!!!!!!!   ;D  ;DI know that BS fallacy of Quantum VERY VERY WELL 


Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
We have the technology, we have the mathematical formula that actually tells us the magnitude and the direction for the magnetic field generated by a moving point charge for any location in 3D space


What technology, you havent invented shit, you are NOT studied in Tesla, Faraday, Maxwell, Steinmentz, nor Heaviside   ;D  ;D

No son, you have jack shit statements, illogical bullshit, and no patents, no evidence, NO LOGIC, no proof, NOTHING,  Absolutely nothing.



Your pathetic sacred cow is made out of plaster and gold paint....., go wimper in the corner.



You dont even know that magnetism is the TERMINATION of either dielectricity OR electricity


Did you FUCKING THINK magnetism is causing magnetism?????????????   demented     :o  :o  :o

Honestly, I have to say "holy fucking shit"  , pardon to others.




I see how your system works, magnetism is causing magnetism  in a "magnet"      OMFG     ;D  ;D

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
.  Around the center of the bar there is a Bloch wall but the magnetic fields in the center are almost nonexistent there because of the flux cancellation. So I suppose you could say that there is a very weak Bloch wall there.


Is that so?  Let me quote you from few hours ago , you INCONSISTENT ASSHOLE>>


Quote from: MileHigh on July 28, 2014, 10:52:26 PM
Quote from: MileHigh on Today at 12:59:44 AM
    Repeat: There is no bloody Bloch wall in the center of a bar magnet, nor some "dielectric inertial plane."



;D  ;D  ;D


How, honestly, did you get so delusional??? 

picowatt

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on July 28, 2014, 11:51:44 PM
What technology

Magnetic force microscope, Kerr-effect laser microscopy, and spin polarized neutron tomography come to mind...

MileHigh

Jeez, this feels like a "Great Turkey Shoot."

QuoteFLUX of what moron?    Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields Fields

And you try to claim that you have studied magnetism for 20 years?  "The medium is the message."

You really stumbled there.

QuoteIs that so?  Let me quote you from few hours ago , you INCONSISTENT ASSHOLE>>

Lat time I looked an "iron bar" was not the same thing as a "bar magnet."

You are just too intense!  Have another coffee!

MileHigh