Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[minnie]

 I wonder if there's ever been a feeble minded employee at a
patent office?
                   John.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I wonder if there's ever been a feeble minded employee at a
patent office?
                   John.

certainly far more here on this forum than in the patent office.


ratio of 100 to 1, or close to same.

[TinselKoala]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_effect

Rotation:
nounnoun: rotation; plural noun: rotationsthe action of rotating around an axis or center."the moon moves in the same direction as the earth's rotation"

synonyms:

revolving, turning, spinning, gyration, circling

Bending:
verbgerund or present participle: bending1. shape or force (something straight) into a curve or angle."the rising wind bent the long grass"

synonyms:

curve, angle, hook, bow, arch, flex, crook, hump, warp, contort, distort, deform

[d3x0r]

Edit: @TK darn was too slow in my research :p

@all

Yes of course bending light can be done with a magnetic field...  on a CRT is a direct effect on photons not non-existant electrons... this is just information the rest of the world thinks in terms of... that real light doesn't bend in a magnetic or coulomb field.

Bending light with a magnet[ic field]
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=282656&page=1 (summary information follows)

Light IS rotated in polarization along a magnetic field
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faraday_rotator

other application- for mapping individual domains on a surface; really a variation of faraday rotator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto-optic_Kerr_effect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeeman_effect
"is the effect of splitting a spectral line into several components in the presence of a static magnetic field"  But it doesn't change directionally.

There is a scattering of high energy gamma rays by atomic nuclei
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delbr%C3%BCck_scattering  but this is all large heavy particles, and high energy EM waves... but basically the photon splits into an electron/positron pair which are then able to be affected by a magnetic field and then recombine to a photon.  (and yes we already know this can't happen because there is no electron/positron - just quoting what others say)
----
I had originally read(understood) that the 'faraday lens' which was light passing through a medium could be bent by a magnetic field... but it's really the polarization that's bent not the direction.
----
But I am interested in any other evidence that the last 150 years of science missed.  IE; don't shoot the messanger.

[TinselKoala]

You'd think that the photons... or whatever they are... that makes up the light from all these distant galaxies would be more spread out and difficult to focus, since all of it has gone through many many magnetic fields of ridiculous strength in order to get to here.