Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Mk1]

@all

I have been looking into the tread for a week now i like it ..

@TheoriaApophasis

This is for one pole so is this what a mono ploe looks like and could you draw and explain the blochwall ..

Thanks

Best regards

Mark

[TheoriaApophasis]

This is for one pole so is this what a mono ploe looks like and could you draw and explain the blochwall ..

polarity by definition negates a monopole


The "monopole" would be the dielectric inertial plane, which in discharge/radiation/POLARization would be the "monopole", however that still a nonsense statement , but the only thing close to a "monopole" is the dielectrical inertial of the so-called "magnet"


"bloch wall" means nothing, its a meaningless name given to an observed phenomena.     Its the dielectric inertial plane which , in radiation/discharge is creating the macro-magnetism such that people call it a "magnet".


it is explained in full in the book, its a free download

[Farmhand]

That shit link is riddled with flaws,  such as :


" It is obtained by replacing the spins of the ferrotoroidic order by electric dipoles. "


Dielectricity HAS , definitionally no dipoles, only magnetic discharge polarization (=dipole).


Typical mental-midget "educated moron" level science



Like most other idiots, that site is blaming flies on horseshit rather than the HORSE.     Same attribute reification fallacy. 


Ive already prove the math that the "vortex" is just expanding and contracting interlacing UNIFORM SPHERES of divergent radiation and convergent dielectric voidance.



Nice link, too bad its more academic bullshit that sticks with the status quo of thinking magnetism is driving magnetism!~!!~~~!!!!!       Goddamn unfiltered fucking insanity.

The horse is not to blame for the flies. What are you taking daddy ? Nothing is to "blame" for the flies, they just are,
they do as flies do. That's like blaming the thermometer for the temperature. The thermometer is just an indicator of something
if you read it or use it wrong it's useless.
..

[TheoriaApophasis]

Heres one for you, WHEN YOU CAN EXPLAIN THE PIC BELOW, THEN YOU UNDERSTAND MAGNETISM A LOT BETTER



HINT: it wouldnt matter if the ring and disk were square , round doesnt matter.


2x2x1" BLOCK magnet


disk magnet can ONLY rest on the inertial plane, and the KNIFE EDGE THIN steel ring can ONLY rest perpendicular to the inertial plane


no glue, no tape, no tricks, all VERY VERY EASILY balanced.

[picowatt]

TA,

Regarding the use of the word "domain" you said:

the very term domain means nothing

"Domain" is indeed a word and does does have a definition, such as this one from Wiki:

"A magnetic domain is a region within a magnetic material which has uniform magnetization."

Or this definition from you yourself:

"Nevertheless, that is still only seeing regions of coherent magnetism"

From this it would appear that what you understand a domain to be and what most everyone else understands a domain to be are one and the same.  I.e., regions of a material within which the magnetic orientation is similar.

I do not understand your objection to the use of "domain", or how you can state that "the very term domain means nothing".

A common language is useful to understanding.

PW