Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,

Regarding the use of the word "domain" you said:

"Domain" is indeed a word and does does have a definition, such as this one from Wiki:

"A magnetic domain is a region within a magnetic material which has uniform magnetization."

YOU JUST PROVED MY POINT


THEY use that same BULLSHIT with the word  FIELD   "Field is a region, a region is a domain in which you can find a FIELD"


thats a CIRCULAR FALLACY   



Yes, domain is a word, and its a DESCRIPTION OF AN OBSERVED PHENOMENA................



NOT an explanation.






a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....a domain is a region, which is a field, which is a domain which is a region which is a field.....


CIRCULAR FALLACY HELL times 100X

[TheoriaApophasis]

I.e., regions of a material within which the magnetic orientation is similar.

youre STILL making the SAME mistake, your blaming polarization/radiation/divergence


Magnetism isnt driving/running/controlling the MAGNETISM in a "magnet"


PERIOD.


See a "domain" (flies), blame it on the magnetism , the HORSESHIT.................. sorry folks, you left out the goddamn HORSE (dielectric capacitance increase AND/OR coherency of same increase).

[picowatt]

TA,

At no time did I state that a domain is anything other than a region of a material of similar magnetic orientation.

It is a word with an accepted meaning.  No one is saying that it is the "cause" of magnetization.  But, apparently, as a mind reader, that is what you believe the word means to many, and it is not.  I can find no reference that makes any claim other than the provided definitions (including yours).  Lighten up.  It seems as if it is only semantics

As for the magnet/ring alignment.  I see nothing unexpected or remarkable.  Rather than always seeing only what you want to see, ask yourself, by normal convention, why does this do as it is observed to do?

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

At no time did I state that a domain is anything other than a region of a material of similar magnetic orientation.

circular fallacy again.

domain = region =  domain = region = domain = region =

I can name a newly discovered critter in a cave, that doesnt mean i understand a damn thing about it.

  No one is saying that it is the "cause" of magnetization. 

99% of people INDEED say that a magnetism is "driving" magnetism.   Even if you do not.

As for the magnet/ring alignment.  I see nothing unexpected or remarkable.

Well then, .....explaining it would be EASY for you then...........   (insert answer)     

[Mk1]

@TheoriaApophasis

Thank you for the answer .

I would love to see a horse shoe magnet ..

Also do you think its posible to capture both dielactric and magnetic , and combine them in electric current , like some people claimed .

Ex http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Hans_Coler_Magnetic_Power_Apparatus

http://www.rexresearch.com/meyers/meyers.htm

lets say i would make a coil exactly like the drawing in 3d would i need to make both side of the blochwall ?

Best regards

Mark

ps sorry i dont know the lingo yet.