Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Electron=Terminon?

Photon= Pulseon?

apparently they act identical

Wow, you nailed it 100%.......... However NO SUCH THING as a photon, its the Z-axis radial dielectric of so-called  "electromagnetism  EM.  T.E.M."

Light/ EM is NOT electromagnetic , only HALF SO.


Light/ EM has a radial dielectric component.


OH SHIT? You mean like a COAX CABLE??  yes, Bobby!!!!!     OH SHIT AGAIN?  Who invented the COAX CABLE? Oliver Heaviside did. 


see here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBKZOl_dRlQ

VIDEO 34 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. THE MISSING SECRET OF LIGHT


VIDEO 35 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. THE MISSING SECRET OF LIGHT PART 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUMP6-Gos2I



EASILY EXPLAINS (and combines):

the BS conclusions from the Photo-electric effect

DESTROYS the "wave particle duality"  BS of Einstein

Explains the Faraday effect   


and explains my friends newly patented invention with 100% CLARITY.






The idiot Einstein said----"We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them (particle and wave theory)  fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do"




Problem solved Einstein, you demented mental midget 

[TinselKoala]

Like fucking hell,  MOST DO THINK THAT


same assholes that think theyre spray-painting targets in an "electron microscope" with electrons.



3 pages ago you said you explain this picture below "EASILY"


Do so   (3rd time i have asked)

It's hilarious: Even his strawman arguments are empty! All their straw has leaked out and they can't even stand on their own merit.

[picowatt]

Is that a yes or no?

Is the process of using a magnetizer to align the magnetic moments of a pre-magnet rate dependent as per Faraday (i.e., dV/dt)?

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

It's hilarious: Even his strawman arguments are empty!

1. PW saw the pic 4 pages ago.......


2. he said he could "EASILY" explain it


3. He did not

4. He HAS NOT


5. CAN YOU?





No tricks, 2 magnets, and a steel ring (could be a square or disk, doesnt matter)

[TheoriaApophasis]

Is that a yes or no?

Is the process of using a magnetizer to align the magnetic moments of a pre-magnet rate dependent as per Faraday (i.e., dV/dt)?

Faraday NOR Maxwell SAID that..................   proving you never READ THEM


HAAAAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!



Faraday was the originator of the concept of =the magnetic field, (which is described in terms of "magnetic curves" our present day "magnetic lines of force") however HE NEVER SO MUCH AS SUGGESTED in his works that induced currents were a resultant of changing magnetic fields. ON THE CONTRARY, he clearly associated the phenomena of electromagnetic induction with changing electrical currents.

As per Maxwell, he TOO considered EM induction as a phenomena in which a current (or EM force) is induced in a circuit. but not as a phenomena in which a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field. He CLEARLY said that the induced EM force is "MEASURED BY, not CAUSED BY the changing mag field"   

Just as Faraday, he made NO allusion to ANY CAUSAL link between magnetic and electric fields


----- Dr. Oleg D. Jefimenko










You keep thinking MAGNETISM IS PRIMARY..............IT IS NOT..........>>>>>>>>>.its a POSTERIOR RESULTANT , its a DISCHARGE<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<