Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[Cap-Z-ro]

Personally, I always liked the tits on a rail barrel analogy.

Regards...

[gravityblock]

.....origin of electromagnetic induction and its dual nature. In the conducting spiral, an inversion of cause and effect in the description of electromagnetism also becomes evident.

"Electromagnetism" is the giant TURD blocking the brains of the "educated IDIOTS" (not referring to YOU)  of the world.




     "The supreme irony is that the notion of "electromagnetism" exists at all, which definitionally cannot exist, since electricity is the product of electrostatics, as meant dielectricity and magnetism (Φ x Ψ = Q, or electrification). To say "electromagnetism" is like saying, "charging-discharge", or "pregnant baby"; it is insanity.  The very term 'electromagnetism' is a compound of two Greek terms, ἢλεκτρον, electron (amber, which creates, easily, electrostatics charges), and the term μαγνήτης, 'magnetic', from (μαγνήτης λίθος), which means "magnesian stone", the "magic attractive stone" with natural macro-magnetic phenomena. Electricity is a hybrid Ether-modality of Φ x Ψ. Magnetism is the radiative discharge of dielectricity, or electrification in discharge at which time it terminates AS magnetism in losing its dielectric component.
     Pliny states that: 'in Syria the women make the whorls of their spindles of this substance, and give it the name of harpax (from ἁρπάζω, "resonate, attract", same as the word for harp musical instrument) from the circumstance that it attracts leaves towards it, chaff, and the light fringes of tissues.' As such we have today the term electromagnetism which is from the terms dielectricity + magnetism, which is what electricity is. However we wrongly understand and fail to differentiate magnetism, from dielectricity, and electricity. These three are wholly separate Ether modalities and electricity is a hybrid of both magnetism and dielectricity in a circuit working together to create electricity."
– Author

The dual nature of electromagnetic induction spoken of in the publication isn't referring to the "electric field" and the "magnetic field", as you wrongly assume.  In clasical mechanics a distinction is made between inert and gravitational mass as two aspeccts of matter whose nature is totally diferent and which are defined and measured by their different effects.  Apparently, the charge also has a dual, inert and gravitational nature.

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

The dual nature of electromagnetic induction spoken of in the publication isn't referring to the "electric field" and the "magnetic field", as you wrongly assume.  In clasical mechanics a distinction is made between inert and gravitational mass as two aspeccts of matter whose nature is totally diferent and which are defined and measured by their different effects.  Apparently, the charge also has a dual, inert and gravitational nature.

Gravock

I know, .......I was making an ASIDE comment on "electromagnetism" in general




You said>>>>>Apparently, the charge also has a dual, inert and gravitational nature.



yes, thats because Dielectricity terminates into the creation of MASS/MATTER in galactic formations. 



Dielectricity is TIED to gravity the same way electricity and magnetism are tied  (so to speak)

[MileHigh]

Well, that's one really strong magnet such that the force of gravity is much stronger than the magnetic forces.  I think that I got the disk magnet explanation, but I am unsure about the thin ring.  You see Kenny, normally we play Show and Tell around here when people do experiments.  So if you want to share some more, perhaps it can all be explained.

But whatever the explanation is, it is what it is.  Do you get that?  You are looking at something conventional, and there is a conventional explanation for it.  It all works out in the end.

MileHigh

[TheoriaApophasis]

Personally, I always liked the tits on a rail barrel analogy.

Regards...

havent heard of that one, how does it go?