Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[93RDELEMENT]

Your nuts hahahahahah engage with me in a conversation let me know the human in you ! I am real not a lie or over stated ambition or some kind of spy in fact there are no spy's anymore its all in your cold war mental health paranoid BRAIN PROGRAMED HEADS .......... R U ALL NUTS ?

NOW TALK TO ME !!! NOT TO YOUR SELF OR THE COMPUTER !!! GET REALITY PLUGED INTO YOUR NEURO NETWORK I AM AN OLD FASHIONED EHGLISH LONDONER BRITISJ BULL DOG CHRIST LOVEING MIRACLE MAN OK HAHAHAHAH !!!!

YOU GUYS ARE ALL NUTS EXCEPT TIN MAN WHO IS A GENTLEMAN ONE OF THE FEW LEFT ON THIS EARTH ...............................

There is no magnetic vortex just closing field conditions and vacuum spacing electron eclipse inverse atomic tightening and magnetic inertia that's it nothing else ....... Stop looking !!! Honestly reading the work of T A is like hearing a drum beat that has no melody and never stops playing the same beat .. He thinks he will hypnotize you until you jump up and down hahahahahahhahahahahaha  GET RID OF THOES STUPID GUNS .......

Be a hippy for a day let go and totally forget magnetic vortex there is no entropy no entropy no vortex  hahahahah is there a physics teacher out there you guys need one hahahahahahahah talk about stupid HAHAHAHAHAHA

REGARDS

THE TRUTH








   

[picowatt]

As it is buried many pages back, I am re-posting the following quotes from TA with regard to the operation of a magnetizer and the process involved in magnetizing a pre-magnet.

Again, lest anyone think I am editing these posts to in any way create a bias, I encourage the reader to read onward a bit from reply #444 on page 30 of this thread.

    Let me give you a clue AGAIN-

    "magnets" are CREATED by discharging capacitor banks THRU THE (pre-) "POLES" (at which time they are of course "PRE-magnetized [rather pre-dielectrified]" ceramics)



    Current is discharged thru the ENTIRE F-ing magnet


    Does the word "induction" ring a bell to you?   (not magnetic INDUCTION), but the induction used to CREATE a "magnet".

    Magnets are not "MAGNETIZED", thats magnetic induction from a magnet TO a piece of iron IN THE MAG FIELD, for example.  That is magnetic field INDUCTION.
    a "magnet" has an enormous dis-equalibrium between the interatomic magneto-dielectric, also as increased by the NeoFeBoron ceramic structure.


    All that magnetism IN a NEO is powered by the charge potential increase FROM the discharged electromagnetic coils INTO the entire F-ing Neo-Fe-Boron "pre-magnet".


    Current is discharged thru the ENTIRE F-ing magnet, which creates, resultantly this magneto-dielectric structure:


    Does the word "induction" ring a bell to you?   (not magnetic INDUCTION), but the induction used to CREATE a "magnet"


    Oh hell, look wireless INDUCTION powering a light bulb!!!  how "new"   (wait, no its not).
    Please wise the hell up, no offense.
    That charge dumps from the banks to the coil  INTO THE "MAGNETS", son,  is what causes the dis-equilibrium and creates that Finger-Breaking  Neo-Magnet (that you have no clue how it works)


    I suggest you learn what ELECTRICAL INDUCTION IS


    In a magnetizer station, an enormous INDUCTIVE CHARGE IS DUMPED into the pre-"magnet" to create the "magnet"   (of which a portion is retained, resultant with the magneto-dielectric dis-equalibrium of the , now,  "magnet").


    Again, suggest you look up the word INDUCTION


    THAT IS, if you think you cannot fry bacon wirelessly between two INDUCTION COILS (which you can) I thought you were smarter than that (guess not).


    An inductive charge is placed from the cap banks, thru the coils and THRU the "magnet" , of which a portion of the charge is left "permanently" remaining

    Just like running a fast river for an instant in the sand, leaving a permanent "mark", in this case, the "mark" is the dis-equilibrium of the magneto-dielectric in and of the (now) "magnet".

    Let me WISE YOU THE HECK up (no offense, honestly)  ....
     CONTACT electrification, and INDUCTION electrification are  BOTH #&*@(@(@  ELECTRIFICATION


    Dead wrong son.      Brief LARGE AMOUNT OF CURRENT you mean.

    You're as clueless as a goddamn lemming.     You dont (still) GET the fucking word  "MAGNETIZE" ,   Magnetization (as implied resultant magnetism in the "magnet")  is the TERMINATION OF ELECTRICITY moron.......... Even a 8th grade book on electricity will tell you that son.


    How the FUCK did you think you created a FINGER CRUSHING NEO MAGNET?    Its inductively CHARGED at the dielectric from the Cap banks, to the coils INTO the Magnet.

    Let me give you a fucking heads up on the word  "ELECTROMAGNET"........OK,     Its OVERWHELMINGLY ELECTRICAL, with resultant strong magnetic (temporary) charge.


    Yes, moron, the magnet is electrically INDUCED BY the ELECTRIC INDUCTION from the ELECTO-magnet.    Wise the ever loving hell up boy.


    NOW ask how you create a (very WEAK) permanent magnet with a STRONG magnet?

    YOU STROKE IT with the strong magnet and align the dielectricity in a coherent fashion in the steel bar ,etc,...    to create resultant macro-magnetic polarization


    Ohhhhhhhh, and WHY IS A MAGNET MADE THIS WAY SO STINKING WEAK IN POWER??    because it was not, IS NOT, HAS NOT been electrified from a HUGE inductive electrical DUMP

    So, you're saying you STILL havent learned about wireless touchless induction?

[93RDELEMENT]

Oh look its a picture hahaha is it a plane no is it a bird no is it a spiral no wtf is it hahahahahahah its not moving its got the wrong curvature no harmonic vector nothing that makes it a vortex !!!!! No I know what it is its an ice cream hahhahaha oops hahahah

you silly stupid monkey hahahahahahahaha get real get a day job !!!! hahahahahahha what a nutter hahahahahahahhaahahah

lol xxxxxxx 

[TheoriaApophasis]

As it is buried many pages back, I am re-posting the following quotes from TA with regard to the operation of a magnetizer and the process involved in magnetizing a pre-magnet.

Again, lest anyone think I am editing these posts to in any way create a bias, I encourage the reader to read onward a bit from reply #444 on page 30 of this thread.

you got the quote right.


what creates "magnets" is dielectric increase in capacitance  (from cap banks to discharge coils)


OR mere dielectric coherency from induction ONLY in rubbing an iron bar with a strong magnet,  IN WHICH CASE, the induction creates dielectric coherency and resultant "soft magnets"



I show in a video how I can reverse polarity in 1 SECOND on a strong (so to say) 1" sphere FERRITE magnet using a large NEO.




Your MENTAL INCAPACITY to understand in NO WAY affects the quote. 




Magnetism is the DISCHARGE of X (dielectricity).        Thats right son, Magnetism is NOT PRIMARY in a "magnet"


either:

A: increased dielectric capacitance

B: coherentcy of the inter-atomic dielectric by induction from another stronger "magnet"




Your brain is fried (likely due to drinking)

[picowatt]

In the previous post, you can see that TA refers to either passing electrical current directly thru the pre-magnet or doing the same using electromagnetic induction.  As passing the current directly thru the poles of a pre-magnet makes no sense on many grounds (and is indeed not actually done when using a magnetizer) we must assume he meant that the current was passed thru the pre-magnet via electromagnetic induction.

If this were the case, I proposed that the strength acheived in the pre-magnet would be rate dependent, that is, would follow Faraday's law and that a magnetizing field with a faster rise/fall time would create a stronger field in the pre-magnet (which I did not believe in reality to be the case).

As I also suggested I would, I have been in touch with an engineer at a magnetizer company and what follows are a few points regarding those discussions:

1. The currents that are induced into a pre-magnet by the magnetizer's changing field produce magnetic fields in opposition to the magnetizer's field. This is undesirable as it can limit the field strength achieved and produce unwanted heating.


2. Although the domains typically align within less than 10ns., the rate that the magnetizer's field is applied is typically slowed to reduce the effects of induced currents.


3. Modern magnetizers typically have selectable capacitor values and adjustable peak voltage values, which, in concert with magnetizer and jig inductance, allow the time parameters of the magnetizer's field to be tailored to reduce the effects of induced currents. As the magnetizer's field reaches its peak value, and briefly holds, all induced currents cease as they are rate dependent (i.e., the currents are only induced while the magnetizer's field strength is changing)


4. In a plated magnet, the induced currents are typically contained within, or greatest within, the plating and because their magnetic fields are in opposition to the magetizer's field, they can act to shield the interior of the pre-magnet and limit the depth of the domains within the pre-magnet that can be oriented (as above, the rate of change of the demagnetizer's field must be slowed to reduce this effect)


5. As it is currently understood, and with various methods having been used to provide evidence thereof, all permanent magnet alloys, and ferrous materials in general, upon cooling below their Curie temp, form domains of approx. 10,000 atoms or atom groups. Each domain assumes a particular magnetic alignment and each domain can be considered as being already magnetized as if it were itself a magnet. Therefore, all PM alloys, and ferrous materials in general, can be considered already magnetized upon cooling below their Curie temp. The catch being that the domains assume a random, lowest energy, alignment that produces a near zero net field strength overall. There are also what are referred to as "pinning forces" that keep the domains in their random low energy orientations.


6. Not all domains can be forced to orient in the direction desired. When all the domains that can be oriented, are oriented, the magnet is said to be saturated. The field strength required to reach saturation must be sufficient to overcome the pinning forces. Once oriented, the pinning forces again act to keep the domains in this new, higher energy state.


7. The source of the magnetic field used as the source of the magnetizer field is unimportant.  For a given applied field strength, that field strength is identical irregardless of whether it comes from an electromagnet or PM (although their are practical considerations regarding the use of a PM as its field cannot be turned off).


8. Other than the requirement that the magnetizing field peak value be applied for at least the minimum time required to orient the domains (typically<10ns), the rate at which the magnetizing field reaches that that peak value, or remains there, has no effect on the field achieved in the pre-magnet, accept as noted with regard to induced currents and the opposing fields they generate.


PW