Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Another display of crazy behaviour.  TK got it right, this whole effect has nothing to do with magnetism.  That's what is implicit in my equation that describes the main things taking place in the clip.

More tempests in teapots and the desire to fit any peg into a any hole.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on August 05, 2014, 07:23:19 PM
if you somehow do not mean "electromagnetic" induction, I suggest you quit posting images of wireless power transmission systems as evidence or support of whatever it is you mean.  Those systems DO use (and obey) electromagnetic induction, and I am sure most readers here will agree, that is indeed what we thought you were saying (at least that is what I understood) precisely because you do post those wireless system images..



You dont know the diff. between magneto-motive force and electromotive force   EMF  MMF   

ROFL

CAPACITANCE is one thing DUMMY............INDUCTION is another......


You are a CLUELESS BOOB,  you dont know that Electricity is the COMBO of  Phi x Psi  (mag and dielectrcity!!!) 


Back to square one with you


Energy, in its most arch-typical form, is embodied in the phenomenon of
Electricity, but what is Electricity? Now our wheels even more stuck in the
mud! But we have important clues, namely that of polarity, not plus or
minus so much but more like male or female. This thought follows from
Goethe to Tesla and Steinmetz. Thus Electricity, in order to manifest, a
UNION must develop. This is the union of the "male", or projective, and
"multiplied by" the "female", or receptive. Hereby, the male is the dielectric
field in counterspace (of per centimeters), and the magnetic field or female
in space (of centimeters squared). Space in cm squared is what you pay for
in "real estate", counterspace in per cm is the space between the lines on a
ruler, or between molecules in a crystal.


For the Electricity extant between a pair of wires in your lamp cord, the
closer the wires, the more capacitance, and thus the more Dielectricity.
Conversely, for the same cord, the farther apart the wires, the more
inductance and thus the more Magnetism. Therefore it is seen that the
smaller the space (the more counterspace) the more Dielectricity that can be
stored, and conversely the larger the space between the wires (the more
real estate) the more Magnetism that can be stored. Very simple, do not let
your mind make it any more complicated than that!


TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: MileHigh on August 05, 2014, 07:25:59 PM
TK got it right, this whole effect has nothing to do with magnetism.



Idiots make claims and descriptions.



The WISE EXPLAIN and PROVE


Continuing then it has been given that the total electrification Q is the
union, or product, of the total dielectric induction Psi, and the total
magnetic induction Phi. In other words, the dimensional relationship Q,
the total electrification, is the product of the dimension of total dielectric
induction Psi, and the dimension of total magnetic induction Phi. Hence we
have FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time
2) Space
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism

Every other relation, quantity, or expression, Volt, Amp, Ohm, etc. is
derived from these FOUR dimensions. Time and Space are the metrical
dimensions; Dielectricity and Magnetism are the physical dimensions. It is
that basic

TinselKoala

Nice copy-pasta.

Now explain how a CRT actually works. You cannot. Construct a radio transmitter, predicting its behaviour mathematically, then demonstrating it works according to the math. You cannot. Cite an actual reference for your statements like "engineering texts or even an eighth grade book will tell you that Magnetism is the termination of Electricity." You cannot.
Explain how the VanDeGraaff machine works. You cannot. Explain the anode tufts embedded in a cathodic plasma. You cannot. Explain the dirod demonstration. You cannot.
And on and on. Kenny, Big Daddy-0, Aryasattvan, Ulf Hansrimehr, you cannot engineer with your silly metaphoric delusions. The Tooth Fairy is a nice way to explain how that quarter got under your pillow. Your delusion is your own private Tooth Fairy. See if she brings you any more quarters.



TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: TinselKoala on August 05, 2014, 07:29:57 PM
Nice copy-pasta.

Now explain how a CRT actually works.



Yes, you and other morons think there are "shooting electrons" in a CRT          :o   :o


GO LEARN WHAT AN "electron" is moron, from someone that ACTUALLY KNOWS , and ACTUALLY builds and creates stuff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lvc5ns3eI7k



This coming from the moron who used a TOY TIRE ON A STICK  to "prove" something that the EXPERIMENT shows contrary movement   


ROFL !!!!!!!!!



Quote from: TinselKoala on August 05, 2014, 07:57:27 AM
In the case of the magnet it is being lagged behind by the point of contact: the center of rotation.


What you fail to grasp is the PHYSICAL magnet is ONE THING,........its  FIELD POLARITY is another thing...........fields DO NOT "see" PHYSICAL MOVEMENT

The inverse spin is due to closest point of contact fields chasing voidance pressures , NOT chasing physical directions.


This is where your BEER SOAKED BRAIN FAILS YOU...........  You can move a magnet in ANY DIRECTION, but the direction of FIELD VOIDANCE ('attraction') will always be the same.

Just as if you had a PHYSICAL GEAR ......and a MAGNETIC "GEAR"


Video 1 EXPLAINS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVw3xhPZywc

Video 2 REPLICATES
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VlMYTL_6hA0



Quote from: TinselKoala on August 05, 2014, 07:57:27 AM
Huh? The video linked in your posted quote is _my_ video, isn't it?

Notice that it also directly refutes the claims about direction made by the Greatest Buddhist Scientist above. The direction of rotation is determined by the force couple. In the case of the rolling wheel, it is being pulled along by the center of rotation and lagged by the contact of the wheel with the substrate. In the case of the magnet it is being lagged behind by the point of contact: the center of rotation. The couple predicts exactly the direction of rotation for both cases.



You left out the important point in your professional   TOY TRUCK WHEEL ON A STICK DEMO,  you beer guzzling Aussie wanka. ..........


B:  the disk magnet or steel disk will PRECESS OPPOSITE to the direction of movement   (why steel also?  still in magnetic induction)


Youre  Fing truck wheel does NOT.  ;D ;D ;D




FAIL






Answer me THIS ONE..........why is it 95% of Aussies have their BRAINS floating in BOOZE 99% of the time??????   ;D ;D ;D ;D