Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

TA,

Having read your replies made while I was posting, are you continuing to draw a distinction between a magnet made using a PM and a magnet made using an EM (or cap discharge into an EM, which is the same thing as any other EM)?

PW

[TheoriaApophasis]

Do you now agree that all magnets are created equal, irregardless of whether a PM, EM, or capacitive discharge/EM is used to align the domains?

PW

They are NOT,   you fail to grasp that a soft ferrite "MAGNET" has ONLY dielectric coherency, and NOT an increase in dielectric capacitance.


Heres an analogy for you.


5 watts of INCOHERENT LIGHT

5 watts of COHERENT LIGHT

100 watts of COHERENT LIGHT



Get it yet? NO?  YES?        Holy shit.

[TheoriaApophasis]

are you continuing to draw a distinction between a magnet made using a PM and a magnet made using an EM

Here is your error,   which I get your brain block.


resultant  SAME GAUSS RATINGS

resultant  WHOLLY DIFF CAPACITANCE, and permanence.



I can take an N42 Gauss ferrite and reverse its polarity in 1 SECOND   



try doing that shit with a NEO or somarium cobalt    ROFL

[TheoriaApophasis]

material and remain as a magnetostatic.

Much like you're approaching this from the view that dielectrics are the only thing that exist, and are responsible in all ways for everything magnetic, Ed Leedskalnin believed the opposite

The term "magnetostatic" is BS itself, magnetism is the discharge from a PRIOR, either dielectric or electricity in losing its dielectric component.


Ed Leedskalnin   ??  FUCK HIM, he was an intelligent person that discovered great ways to MOVE HUGE CORAL ROCKS



His book on magnetism is the most insane oblivious nonsense and horseshit I have ever read.   Have you read his "work" on magnetism?   Its like he scribbled it while constipated on his toilet.

[picowatt]

They are NOT,   you fail to grasp that a soft ferrite "MAGNET" has ONLY dielectric coherency, and NOT an increase in dielectric capacitance.

But you have stated previously that some electrical means, i.e., cap discharge, is required to make one type of magnet and a that a PM can only be used to make another.  Assuming you are making a distinction between a SmCo or NdFeB magnet and say AlNiCo and FeO ceramics, according to someone who designs the equipment that is used to "magnetize" them, the process used to "magnetize" them makes no difference.  As long as the magnetic field (oersteds) applied to the poles of the pre-magnet are similar, and of sufficient strength to overcome pinning forces, the source of the magnetic field or the rate at which it is applied is unimportant (as long as the rate is slow enough to prevent inducing unwanted levels of eddy currents).

Heres an analogy for you.


5 watts of INCOHERENT LIGHT

5 watts of COHERENT LIGHT

100 watts of COHERENT LIGHT



Get it yet? NO?  YES?        Holy shit.

No, I don't get it.  Your analogy makes no sense.

PW