Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

    But again you're moving, and a ferromagnet and ferroelectric can maintain a magnetic field and electric field themeselves without motion.  And a ferroelectric has no magnetic field, and a ferromagnet has no electric field.  Moving one in time and the other space can join and entangle and form electricity, which may then be fed back to a dielectric storage or inductive storage... and again become magnetic and/or dielectric.

Yes, IM MOVING THE MAGNET, I said that last page.

FOUR primary dimensions in electrical engineering. These are:
1) Time
2) Space
3) Dielectricity
4) Magnetism


YOU SAID:
magnetic field and electric field themeselves without motion.


No such BS in this cosmos as  "Static magnetism"      EVERYTHING you can see with your eyes (and cannot) is MOVING.     Go show me a static ATOM.   ROFL !!!
That IS some PURE GRADE insanity

You said:
Moving one in time and the other space can join and entangle and form electricity


I said that last page dammit, moving a magnet  a SINGLE MAGNET produces electricity,  just because NOTHING IS COUPLING OFF that very meager electricity doesnt mean it isnt there
ABSURD

A magnet alone is not electricity.  (without a change in space) If you had a moving dielectric intermingled with magnetic, you would have electricity, and a magnet is not electricity.
Just as a capacitor alone is not electricity.  (without a change in time)

HINT::::::::::::::  A "magnet" is NOT A MAGNET(ISM).............     A magnet is powered by Dielectricity, ....magnetism is the SHIT,  the radiation, dielectricity is the 'HORSE' running the show.   


Thats right, the entire visible (and most of the micro-invisible atomic) universe is the defecation of a DISCHARGE, or a continuing discharge.    Empirical beings are living in a mirage world created by discharges, the fecal matter of dielectricity.



All you have to do is MOVE a magnet in space and time, dielectricity and magnetism are already present in and of the "magnet".

"The term quantity of electricity was once common in scientific publications. It appears frequently in the writings of Franklin, Faraday, Maxwell, Millikan, and J. J. Thomson, and was even occasionally used by Einstein.However, over the last hundred years the term "electricity" has been used by electric utility companies and the general public in a non-scientific way. Today the vast majority of publications no longer refer to electricity as meaning electric charge. Instead they speak of electricity as electromagnetic energy. The definition has drifted even further, and many authors now use the word "electricity" to mean electric current (amperes), energy flow (watts), electrical potential (volts), or electric force. Others refer to any electrical phenomena as kinds of electricity.
These multiple definitions are probably the reason that Quantity of Electricity has fallen into disfavor among scientists. Physics textbooks no longer define Quantity of Electricity or Flow of Electricity. Quantity of electricity is now regarded as an archaic usage, and it has slowly been replaced by the terms charge of electricity, then quantity of electric charge, and today simply charge. Since the term electricity has increasingly become corrupted by contradictions and unscientific definitions, today's experts instead use the term charge to remove any possible confusion"

Connotation is not DENOTATION.    Ignorant humans fuck up everything ever discovered. (not meaning you).

Suck-O-pedia is no reference for anything though.

I prefer Dollard's terminology from lone pine writings... (included a few posts ago, because when I got it, it was free.)
"For the Electricity extant between a pair of wires in your lamp cord, the
closer the wires, the more capacitance, and thus the more Dielectricity.
Conversely, for the same cord, the farther apart the wires, the more
inductance and thus the more Magnetism. Therefore it is seen that the
smaller the space (the more counterspace) the more Dielectricity that can be
stored, and conversely the larger the space between the wires (the more
real estate) the more Magnetism that can be stored. Very simple, do not let
your mind make it any more complicated than that!

Yes, and?  Agreed.

Reviewing LPW a little more; Dollard does not go as far to say there are variants in space without variant in time... so every term involves time.
Dielectricity operates in time... and because a wire itself has dielectric character, it is inescapable to have time... but pure induction should require no time... Quantum entanglement for instance.

No, dielectricity OPERATES at the rate allowed by INDUCTION of a given field, which translates INTO time.    Whooooooooops 


Sorry, Quantum is a dirty WH0RE with AIDS, I dont touch that filthy shit.         Everything nature can be explained by Euclidean geometry and Platonic logic.

It is logically hard to conceive of a motion without time since so few things teleport and cover space without time.

Induction by longitudinal dielectrics  "UNDER" spacetime, yes.

not hard at all, its both rational and exists.  YES

Space and time dont exist, their the SHIT / BYPRODUCT of polarized fields. Empirical existence is defined by space and time, that doesnt make them REAL, theyre a mirage.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Those bright crossing points is where the edges of the magnet induce magnetic "storms" by motion through space while they disconnect/reconnect where they touch with the vortex of the magnet.

Reference:  How to tie a knot in a bubble ring.  The video found on the reference link is awsum!

Gravock

Yeahhh, no.   You mean this paper:   http://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.3321v1.pdf


"storms" eh? 

What seemingly everyone doesnt get is that moving a magnet in space and time causes magnetic dielectric intersection due to the conjugate nature of magnetism and dielectricity.

See paper Coulomb fields, Measuring Propagation Speed of Coulomb Fields

Also see paper-----Proof of Latency of Coulomb Fields




LIKE everyone, you dont "GET" that moving a PHYSICAL MAGNET is one thing

moving its MAGNETIC and DIELECTRIC FIELDS has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LATENCY<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

hence electrification.


multiphase generator
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz_yZ3tMiLY&index=2&list=UUjmdCG5tPtmiODDt4IO-svA

[gravityblock]

It is logically hard to conceive of a motion without time since so few things teleport and cover space without time.

Space and Time is an illusion.  Time should play the part instead of meters or distance. We should look upon Time as the result of the force that impels a body through space. The greater the force, the shorter the time, and the shorter also the space to be traversed. Thus, if the force were infinitely great, time and space would be infinitely small, they would cease to exist. If the force was infinitely small, time and space would be infinitely great.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

Yeahhh, no.   You mean this paper:   http://arxiv.org/pdf/1310.3321v1.pdf


"storms" eh? 

What seemingly everyone doesnt get is that moving a magnet in space and time causes magnetic dielectric intersection due to the conjugate nature of magnetism and dielectricity.

See paper Coulomb fields, Measuring Propagation Speed of Coulomb Fields

Also see paper-----Proof of Latency of Coulomb Fields




LIKE everyone, you dont "GET" that moving a PHYSICAL MAGNET is one thing

moving its MAGNETIC and DIELECTRIC FIELDS has >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LATENCY<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

hence electrification.


multiphase generator
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jz_yZ3tMiLY&index=2&list=UUjmdCG5tPtmiODDt4IO-svA

The edges of the magnet produce magnetic "storms" by motion through space (an absolute effect) which are equivalent to negative (VxB) effects.  The magnetic "storms" are vortices, and we saw similar "storms" or tornadoes in the magnetic vortex videos with the hydrogen bubbles, so I don't know why you are shocked by the usage of the word "storms".  I confirmed what you said, but I used the language of the research paper instead of the language which is more acceptable to you.  You are your own worst enemy!

Gravock 

[d3x0r]

Yes; moving the magnet does not move the magnetic field (at least rotationally)
http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/homopolar.htm  (demonstration of homopolar generators, one moving the plate and not the magnet, one moving the magnet and not the plate and one moving both)  So gyro anything doesn't help.  Otherwise you could just set a magnet on a conductive surface and have a current induced.  Doesn't happen.

A: there is already moving magnetism as its nature, AND gyromagnetic precession
B: AND also physical space and time movement OF the magnet.

A) Yes there's lots of motion all the time... but it has to have relative motion to induce electricity...
B) you can't prove that time is required.... in fact there's an example called quantum entanglement that says time is not required. (even if you disagree with anything with the attribute quantum, the resulting effect is still present, describe it in your lingo)

You forget that magnetism being Spatial and dielectricity being radial
Magnetism and dielectricity are always, as is their nature, in conjugate relative "motion" due to magnetism having an enormous time differential that the dielectric doesnt have.  So , wrong again.

this is how Tesla was able to propagate longitudinal dielectric transmissions at (what was it again?) 3.6X  C

dielectricity isn't radial, it's temporal.
re tesla: Because dielectric happens in time and the space is irrelevant.

Haaa!!!!  Now you need to look into Galactic JETS and see what is going on at the center.

how does that have anything to do with our relative motion... was a statement to agree, yes everything is moving, all the time.  (you already said you didn't like the primer field guy, so I'm not bringing that up...) 

There is no such thing as "JUST magnetism".     Go show me JUST MAGNETISM autonomously.  Doesnt exist.  Its a posterior discharge to "X".

You have tons sitting around you.  But you already have your explanation... so I can't show anything, any more than you can show my that there's electricity from a magnet alone.

Dont go down that Quantum BS road.

so the discharge is into counterspace and charge from same counterspace?  That's an open circuit... a single conductor with unclosed ends.... ahh but you think there's two distinct interfaces (conduction paths) so that makes it all ok.  Then again you don't need phi.  EVERYTHING is in terms of Psi.  So why do you keep regurgitating that obviously obsolete paradigm?  IF magnetic induction is just a function of dielectric induction, then there's only f(dielectric induction_{counterspacial}) * dielectric induction_spacial? = plank. Except dielectric induction isn't spacial... so it can't be counterspacial either.