Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

but then you go on to say that a primary force is magnetism

I said Dielectricity (charge) and magnetism (discharge)  are BOTH PRIMARY,.......so you misquoted me.

The etymology of electricity can be found in numerous other sites and they all say the same thing.  And yes, I do often check other places and end up going back to pick up the wikipedia link because it's often better phrased coming from several cooks in the kitchen.
Yes, and?  Agreed.

No.

The supreme irony is that the notion of "electromagnetism" exists at all, which definitionally cannot exist, since electricity is the product of electrostatics and magnetism, as meant dielectricity and magnetism (Φ x Ψ = Q, or electrification). To say "electromagnetism" is like saying, "charging-discharge", or "pregnant baby"; it is insanity.  The very term 'electromagnetism' is a compound of two Greek terms, ἢλεκτρον, electron (amber, which creates, easily, electrostatics charges), and the term μαγνήτης, 'magnetic', from (μαγνήτης λίθος), which means "magnesian stone", the "magic attractive stone" with natural macro-magnetic phenomena. Electricity is a hybrid Ether-modality of Φ x Ψ. Magnetism is the radiative discharge of dielectricity, or electrification in discharge at which time it terminates AS magnetism in losing its dielectric component. Pliny states that: 'in Syria the women make the whorls of their spindles of this substance, and give it the name of harpax (from ἁρπάζω, "resonate, attract", same as the word for harp musical instrument) from the circumstance that it attracts leaves towards it, chaff, and the light fringes of tissues.' As such we have today the term electromagnetism which is from the terms dielectricity + magnetism, which is what electricity is. However we wrongly understand and fail to differentiate magnetism, from dielectricity, and electricity. These three are wholly separate Ether modalities and electricity is a hybrid of both magnetism and dielectricity in a circuit working together to create electricity

Sorry, Quantum is a dirty WH0RE with AIDS, I dont touch that filthy shit.         Everything nature can be explained by Euclidean geometry and Platonic logic.

*shrug* then what description would you call it?  spooky action at a distance?  Nothing in your theory has yet described or named that effect.  Just because you don't like a word, doesn't mean the resulting effect doesn't actually happen.

Its only SPOOKY to Quantum Cultists because they KNOW damn well FIELDS do not = PARTICLES


That 1200 pound GORILLA sitting on the SKULLS of Quantum BULLSHIT is this one word........   >>>>>>>>>  FIELD  <<<<<<<<

[TheoriaApophasis]

But in fact what was being said, was the creation of a magnetic field in a coil is a field moving in space, to go back to faradays description 'creates a wave of magnetism'... again inseparable from the dielectric propagation in reality, but not in theory (well except your theory).

I said no such thing, longitudinal dielectrics are another beast.     I refer merely to MAGNETISM and magnets.


You said-------- was the creation of a magnetic field in a coil is a field moving in space

Yeah,  because it has transverse components, or circulatory magnetism resultantly.

all electricity is a hybrid of magnetism and dielectricity.      ANYTHING with Magnetism IN or, or PART of it is "Moving IN space" (of another field)  or also "creating space".


Electricity doesnt terminates "INTO magnetism" but  "AS magnetism". .........That is HUGELY important.
Electricity loses its dielectric component by discharge.


"electromagnetism" as a very term is a fallacy.  Like saying a "charging discharge"

Light, and TEM are not electromagnetic, they have a Z-axis radial dielectric component like a COAX cable.

electricity only exists at the crossing of dielectricity and magnetism.    Maybe dielectro-magnetic propagation (= electrification).   


The line of force can be more clearly understood by representing it as a tube of force or a long thin cylinder. Maxwell presented the idea that the tension of a tube of force is representative of
electric force (volts/inch), and in addition to this tension, there is a medium through which these tubes pass. There exists a hydrostatic pressure against this media or ether. The value of this pressure
is one half the product of dielectric and magnetic density. Then there is a pressure at right angles to an electric tube of force. If through the growth of a field the tubes of force spread sideways or in
width, the broadside drag through the medium represents the magnetic reaction to growth in intensity of an electric current. However, if a tube of force is caused to move endwise, it will glide through the medium with little or no drag as little surface is offered. This possibly explains why no magnetic field is associated with certain experiments performed by Tesla involving the movement of energy with no accompanying magnetic field.






What IF , perchance, the universe and its Ether modalities were divinely SIMPLEX, but 200 years of Quantum BS, Relativists and other KOOKS have been shitting on it for so long it only LOOKS  "extremely complex"

WHAT IF   

[d3x0r]

The phase shift (see image or reference link below) cannot be explained if the magnetic field is considered to be immobile, but is readily explained by the rotation of the magnetic field with the magnet.  The magnetic field moves with it's source!  A current isn't induced by simply setting a magnet on a conductive surface because the field will cut the conductive surface twice in opposite directions.

The electrometer mentioned in the article is a way to perform truly "single piece" voltage measurements without having to close the loop, which raises the endless question as to where the voltage is truly generated. The open probe circuit is easily constructed and has a sensitivity of detecting 1 volt, which is ridiculously high. Credit goes to broli for bringing this open probe circuit to our attention.


1.) Zajev-Dokuchajev (Z-D) effect: the moving of the magnetic field with the rotating magnet.

Gravock

again, you're just further reinforcing that there's a relative motion that causes the induction... "as the magnet rotates" (quoted from the paper presented)...

"The magnetic circuit used comprised a permanent ring magnet and a soft iron
yoke rotating together"  the field doesn't move, the iron does.
In the other case, of a static loop, they're moving the magnet through its poles through the magnet and it induces a charge... just like those shake-charge flashlights.

The last animation on http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/homopolar.htm#puzzles  (lower right side) the magnet rotates, the conductor does not, and there is no voltage generated.
The lower left one, the conductor is moved (in faraday generator style) and the magnet is not, and it does generate a voltage.  The first clip in Homopolar generator section both the conductive plate and the magnet turn together, and a voltage is induced...

So we can conclude that even though the magnet rotates the magnetic field does not move.... but of course if you attach the conductive surface to the magnet and spin both, since the field isn't actually moving, the plate is moving relative to the field.

[d3x0r]

What the fuck is wrong with you?  I have already provided you with a reference paper and an experiment that shows non-relative motion can cause induction.

Gravock

ANd I linked you visual evidence that it doesn't nessicarily.  I read the paper you linked to understand what it was they did.  They did homopolar generator video #1.  They didn't do #3.
(or maybe I needed time to compose thoughts to theo, and you double replied)

[d3x0r]

Quantum entanglement

Quantum is a dirty WH0RE with AIDS, I dont touch that filthy shit.         Everything nature can be explained by Euclidean geometry and Platonic logic.

*shrug* then what description would you call it?  Spopky action at a distance?  Nothing in your theory has yet described or named that effect.  Just because you don't like a word, doesn't mean the resulting effect doesn't actually happen.

Its only SPOOKY to Quantum Cultists because they KNOW damn well FIELDS do not = PARTICLES


That 1200 pound GORILLA sitting on the SKULLS of Quantum BULLSHIT is this one word........   >>>>>>>>>  FIELD  <<<<<<<<

*shrug* then what description would you call it?  Nothing in your theory has yet described or named that effect.  Just because you don't like a word, doesn't mean the resulting effect doesn't actually