Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[gravityblock]

again, you're just further reinforcing that there's a relative motion that causes the induction... "as the magnet rotates" ...

"The magnetic circuit used comprised a permanent ring magnet and a soft iron
yoke rotating together"  the field doesn't move, the iron does.
In the other case, of a static loop, they're moving the magnet through its poles through the magnet and it induces a charge... just like those shake-charge flashlights.

The last animation on http://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/jw/homopolar.htm#puzzles  (lower right side) the magnet rotates, the conductor does not, and there is no voltage generated.
The lower left one, the conductor is moved (in faraday generator style) and the magnet is not, and it does generate a voltage.  The first clip in Homopolar generator section both the conductive plate and the magnet turn together, and a voltage is induced...

So we can conclude that even though the magnet rotates the magnetic field does not move.... but of course if you attach the conductive surface to the magnet and spin both, since the field isn't actually moving, the plate is moving relative to the field.

There's no voltage generated with the magnet rotating while both the conductive disc and external circuit remains stationary because the field cuts the circuit twice in opposite directions, which cancels the voltage.  You're making a gross newbie mistake when it comes to HPM.

Gravock

[TheoriaApophasis]

*shrug* then what description would you call it?  Nothing in your theory has yet described or named that effect.  Just because you don't like a word, doesn't mean the resulting effect doesn't actually

No such BULLSHIT exists,  same as "wave particle duality"  BS.


I explained that away here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBKZOl_dRlQ
2 part video



they formulated the EPR paradox,   its only a "Paradox" to their  PEA BRAINS, because they deny ANYTHING that isnt mediated by their mystical UNICORN particles.



Quantum entanglement doesnt exist.  Its a Fing fallacy like the "discharge particle" and the PHOTON.


Dont you even KNOW how this SHIT is created?


1. observe phenomena

2. verify the phenomena with others

3. NAME it


descriptions aren't explanations.

same as "Bloch wall".         Well, these mental midget assholes have been CALLING something a NAME, clueless what it is, what it does, and HOW it works.


Descriptions are the realm of children.

[TheoriaApophasis]

There's no voltage generated with the magnet rotating while both the conductive disc and external circuit remains stationary because the field cuts the circuit in opposite directions, which cancels the voltage.  You're making a gross newbie mistake when it comes to HPM.

Gravock

Its also the same as fluid dynamics.



Sitting in a tub displaces water, there IS a current,>>>>>> but its equalized.


mere displacement , no voltage, but there is EMF present.   


Electrification is 2 brats in the tub splashing the shit out of the water (conductive coil)       

[d3x0r]

There's no voltage generated with the magnet rotating while both the conductive disc and external circuit remains stationary because the field cuts the circuit twice in opposite directions, which cancels the voltage.  You're making a gross newbie mistake when it comes to HPM.

Gravock

It cuts it the same number of times in all cases.

[TheoriaApophasis]

It cuts it the same number of times in all cases.

no it doesnt

every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
10 field-boundary gradients



Every 360 rotation is 10 slaps to face of the so-called "conductor"