Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[picowatt]

How curious you have no study of Platonic debates, ...the premise of sophistry is to divert or end meaningful discussions meant to reach an ends.


Today we call it derailment.


I see nobody keeping you from discussing anything.



Flap your gums however & whenever you want.

While I thank-you for your permission, I did not realize it was required.

Lighten up, I stated my observation and raised a possibility.

PW

[Rfacts]

Picowatt:
   I appreciate your objectivity and the supporting statements that you followup with after additional research, I find them
informative and think any critical thinker would appreciate it.  Your calm reasonable responses are noteworthy and leave the
impression that you would stand corrected if you were provided verifiable facts to the contrary.
   It is ironic that based on the first paragraph of TheoriaApophasis's current magnetism book you would be classified a type 4
and TA would be classified a type 3 by his definition of the types of gatekeepers of the mind.  I'm basing this on how he has
responded here to some objective/constructive comments that he does not agree with.  TA has made it clear that he is not
selling anything and is not trying to convince anyone but that does not change this public perception of him.

   "3. The gatekeeper of the mind which lets in those things it likes or agrees with and not those things it does not like or agree
with, even if those things are true and wise. This is the third most common type."
   "4. The gatekeeper of the mind which judges things as wise and logical, and lets those things in, and judges things as unwise
and irrational and bars them from entry into the mind. This type of gatekeeper of the mind is the most sublime and rare."

   I agree with TA when he ends the first paragraph of his book by stating "Open minds are only good up to a point at which
nonsense, lies, and irrational chaos is allowed to enter.  Closed minds are only good up to a point where things wise and true
are barred entry.  At this point we must agree that wholly open minds are bad, and wholly closed minds are equally as bad."

[TheoriaApophasis]

change this public perception of him.

Some people worry their lives away about perception,....... some (very very few) could care less, and have wisdom and discovery as the bliss and warmth that is more dear and lasts longer than any "loving perception" from others, which ultimately, has NO WORTH , NO VALUE.

"Open minds are only good up to a point at which nonsense, lies, and irrational chaos is allowed to enter.  Closed minds are only good up to a point where things wise and true
are barred entry.  At this point we must agree that wholly open minds are bad, and wholly closed minds are equally as bad."

Great quote, whoever said that must be wise.    (insert silent snickering).



FM below stands for FIELD MOVEMENT

AM for APPARENT MOVEMENT


D = divergence

C = convergence


Ergo, this is ONLY ONE vector below, not both shown. ...........and hence the SPATIAL CONFUSION others (almost everyone really) have.


Inverse and interlaced superimposition of the BELOW picture,..but in reverse, is needed to show both "poles"  divergent and convergent magnetic reciprocations.

P1 = pole one

P2 = pole two



both pics are same from diff. angles

[Rfacts]

Some people worry their lives away about perception,....... some (very very few) could care less, and have wisdom and discovery
as the bliss and warmth that is more dear and lasts longer than any "loving perception" from others, which ultimately, has NO
WORTH , NO VALUE.

I agree with your view about public perception.  I was stating an observation about your public perception, not that you would
care about.  At least you didn't try to rationalize away some of your irrational responses which put you in your own type 3
gatekeeper of the mind category.  Not selling anything or trying to convince anyone doesn't exempt you from REASON.

[TinselKoala]

It's pretty funny to hear someone who writes long books and makes post like this thread, telling you that he's not trying to convince anyone of anything. Why is he writing the books then? I know why: it's because he's fascinated by the sound of his own gums flapping. After all, it cannot be because he is trying to convince anyone of anything, so there must be another reason. Either that, or our faithful correspondent has emitted yet another "truth error", one amongst many.

I am still laughing about the "one million volt Tesla coil".