Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[d3x0r]

well, its just a tease of levitation and light.



none of those objects are suspended freely in the air.

I still like Russ's...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMEkA2_N6vY
  But then it's his open source attitude maybe that gives it a +.


there's lots of people that have magnetic bearings on pulse motors... so it's not impossible to make the mirror ball spin freely ... actually maybe sink it in a cube of water and pressure control neutral bouency and free spin.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I still like Russ's...

Nope, his design is inferior


1. its top heavy

2. its obtrusive, you can never just LOOK THRU it, youre always staring at yet ANOTHER LEG behind it




Mine will levitate with a greater air gap than his will.

I will show and prove same next week or so.




But, whatever you like 

[sadang]

Sadang:

Forget about indoor plumbing, that's a government conspiracy.  In one more generation we will be too stoopid to have indoor plumbing.

MileHigh

Good morning MileHigh,

I see you already received answers to this message from others who see things deeply than you! Thanks to them!

No, not again! Don't even try on your further activity to show someone so called proofs (images, photos, movies) of atoms or elementary "particles" or even subatomic "particles", which were visualized or seen. At least not in the actual materialist scientific paradigm! I talked about this kind of images on other forums few years ago, when for first time a group of specialists from Lund University, Sweden took photographs and even made a film of an electron. A photo can't be made to something so small and moving with fascinating speed and rotating the same! Not to say it is not a particle at all, but an antinode of fields, a shadow for our reality, at least what we constiently call and define reality! Lean deep on this subject and well see for yourself!

For the next of the message... have you ever tried to look to the reality and to yourself through the ether and the teachings of the ancients?

And one last thing: reassessing your references and will surely see different and much more further than of your actual urgent need of indoor plumbing! Nothing is static so don't worry, you will also change with the times!

Friendly,
SaDAng

[TinselKoala]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt3EzIL-jhk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLCOBzuxIWQ

[d3x0r]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vt3EzIL-jhk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pLCOBzuxIWQ

Mark Leclaire; uses water cavitation toroids to cut ultra small holes... but that's using atomic(err molecular) water
First picture: Just because there's holes does it have to be particles?
Second Picture: is result of a laser cutting ( will be over-excitition of electrostatic field(s?) )

--- just musing----

Speaking of molecules... blacklight power claims to have software to model conglomerations of atoms...  claims to be accurate, but noone cares enough to make any copies pulic.


if everything were a bubble... what's the smallest bubble greater than 0 radius that can exist?  Aka chopping 'particles'...
suppose would depend on the medium of the boundary condition... (marbles, silicon, smaller frothy bubbles under atoms?... efter posting that I doubt that makese sense... if you had sticky marbles, and blew bubbles in it, what's the smallest bubble compared to other things... like water as a bounding form)


I dunno; maybe it's cause a van de graff generator feels prickly when you're near it... because the field contacts and pinches randomly at the sharp hairs that it feels like being pelted with hail stones... or particles...


the stupid double slit experiment says electrons are waves... actually quantum has everything to do with fields and nothing to do with particles... other than a classification of behaviors of fields called particles / might be called modalities.... so not sure why it's so dispised...


the stupid double slit experiment says electrons are waves... depending on if it's observed or not... and observation is destructive... meh rambling again