Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rfacts

TheoriaApophasis:
You are jumping to conclusions, my comments were not about a popularity contest or seeking approval.  You are publicly posting
comments and videos and giving away a technical ebook.  You are making your work available to the public for a reason,
technical work is not taken seriously by type 4 gate keepers when you lose credibility as an experimentalist.  Of course this does
not matter if you are ok with type 1 and 3 blind followers.  I thought that you had good reason for going over the different types
of gate keepers of the mind in the first paragraph of your ebook but your actions contradict this.  I made it clear with the
example I provided you that I was referring to your credibility as an experimentalist.

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on August 19, 2014, 08:00:29 AM
I appreciate genuine logic, experimentation, Platonic methods, and intelligent investigations.

If you truly appreciate this you would want to rule out other possible explanations for your observations/findings and objectively
consider other possible explanations when they are brought to your attention.  For example, you continue to stand by your
assertion that the magnet is generating the heat and not ruling out the possibility that the FLIR camera or something else is the
heat source that is being reflected.  You made the assertion, it is your burden of proof. 

If you truly do appreciate genuine logic and intelligent investigations you would objectively consider what is pointed out to you in
a well reasoned manner instead of going off topic with derogatory rants.  All it takes is one clear example, like not considering
this valid technical point that was raised, to throw up red flags about your credibility as a clear thinking experimentalist.  If you
can't be objective about one experiment there is no telling how many more are (or will be) subjective.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: Rfacts on August 20, 2014, 06:11:40 AM
You made the assertion, it is your burden of proof. 


Indeed I did.  However I have NO BURDEN,  get off your DUFF and experiment yourself.  You are not paying me to prove ANYTHING.



I also said I don't give a tinkers damn what anyone thinks,
.......this isnt the church. I want NEITHER your respect, NOR your money ......along with anything else.




I have a serious project to finish, and my programmed (so to speak) bismuth is showing remarkable phenomena.   Likewise I am building a divinely unique levitation construct for a friend so he can market it (for himself).

AND I have 2 translations and book to get out.


If you think, no offense, Im going to waste EXCESSIVE unnecessary time proving ANYTHING to internet yahoos when they can do the experiments THEMSELVES........then you are delusional.




Quote from: Rfacts on August 20, 2014, 06:11:40 AM
  All it takes is one clear example


The example is SET, go replicate it, I have many other projects.






pics below for Tinman

picowatt

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on August 20, 2014, 06:51:34 AM

Indeed I did.  However I have NO BURDEN,  get off your DUFF and experiment yourself.  You are not paying me to prove ANYTHING.



I also said I don't give a tinkers damn what anyone thinks,
.......this isnt the church. I want NEITHER your respect, NOR your money ......along with anything else.


I have a serious project to finish, and my programmed (so to speak) bismuth is showing remarkable phenomena.   Likewise I am building a divinely unique levitation construct for a friend so he can market it (for himself).

AND I have 2 translations and book to get out.


If you think, no offense, Im going to waste EXCESSIVE unnecessary time proving ANYTHING to internet yahoos when they can do the experiments THEMSELVES........then you are delusional.





The example is SET, go replicate it, I have many other projects.

There is no need to "waste" any time by repeating the experiment as performed.  The assertion was made that the FLIR video provides proof that a magnet radiates or dissipates heat in some manner unique to its magnetic properties. 

At 0:20 to 0:21 in the FLIR video everyone can plainly see that the magnet, holding fixture, and CRT are all at the same temperature within the temperature resolution of the FLIR camera.  This is quite evident due to the fact that all of these objects are represented by the same color and indeed are barely visible from their ambient surroundings (hence only a "ghostly" outline of these objects can be seen).

It is not until the heat emitted by the FLIR camera itself is reflected off the plated surface of the magnet back towards the field of view of the FLIR camera that any heat above ambient is indicated.

Contrary to the assertions made by TA in the FLIR video, this experiment proves that within the resolving power of the FLIR, the magnet remains at the same temperature as the surrounding non-magnetized objects and is not producing, dissipating, or emitting heat at a rate any different from those surrounding non-magnetized  objects. 


FLIR video posted by TA:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJvIMU7JYM

PW

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on August 20, 2014, 11:22:34 AM
There is no need to repeat the experiment as performed.
PW



Spoken like a true sophistic monkey.

As predictable as sunrise.




You forgot to ask me if I gave a damn what you think

picowatt

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on August 20, 2014, 11:27:08 AM


Spoken like a true sophistic monkey.

As predictable as sunrise.




You forgot to ask me if I gave a damn what you think

My post was intended for those with a more open and logical mind...