Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.


MileHigh

I can't help but notice that whenever Kenny is put in an awkward position because of a statement he made or a question he can't answer he has a multiple postagasm!   (Not to be confused with the other-a-gasm.) 

TheoriaApophasis

I can't help but notice that whenever HighforMiles is put in an awkward position because of a video, he shuts the fuck up.


When i asked you to explain this one  ((((   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBS2bE8-CmE     )))     you said:
"I dont know".   




   Its very simple, so explain it bitch.

TinselKoala

Quote from: john_doe on August 21, 2014, 08:21:29 PM
@ TK

Sorry I don't mean to harp on, though, I am really interested to know if you're able to recreate the storm on Saturn in a lab, then you must understand how it works?

@ PW

I'd like to ask you directly, if you have access to a lab that can re-produce what TA is saying, are you willing to collaborate and help with "scientific" testing methods?
Things that are written down are meaningless. There are many ways to explain this statement, though, if you don't understand that statement then you won't understand me so there's no point. I'm sorry but everything starts and stops with the macroscopic universe for me because I can verify it.
Perspective, perspective, perspective.

@ TA

There are far more avenues this will open up rather than simple data transfer (Though I'd stay the hell away from something that's transmitting that much data; I've seen pigeons FRIED by our current technology!)

@ALL

I've asked a few times for an explanation as to why the "macroverse" works the way it does if this "Magnetic Vortex" isn't true & it's been ignored. It hasn't been answered because no-one actually knows. (There isn't a single piece of written evidence because "they're" trying to hold it back for the same reasons they stopped the space program; the Govt eventually needs to answer to the people, private companies don't!) A theory as good as this shouldn't be discussed using the very small because many don't have access to the LHC (Large Hadron Collider) or the results it's "actually" producing.  But, we all have access to large telescopes and there aren't too many "forces" acting uniformly throughout the universe.
Nature doesn't do straight lines and gamma rays are shot in a straight line. Again, I ask you to think of a bullet and then try to explain how this theory doesn't "hold up". Particles are irrelevant in this discussion because they use Math.

We live in a shooting gallery. Imagine a child 2 years old walking through a Rifle range and the shooter's don't even know the child is downrange.
That's the area of space we live in and we as a species really act like a 2yo. We cry when someone takes our toys and expect the boob when we're hungry.
If you are happy with the fact that "someone else will protect your children's way of life" then by all means give no thought to the theory and let people walk all over it.
Personally I think, if you guys are members of this forum with access to acceptable "scientific methods of verifying" then put up or don't bother being here. All I've seen (and I'm the first to admit I don't know anything) is negative responses to something quite critical. (No, I'm not talking about personality clashes)
We, as a species, didn't even realise Russia was about to be leveled. Millions of people would have been killed and the country destroyed. It isn't a stretch to see how it could have been the city you live in.
If you truly understand the "gravity" (Again, sorry about the pun but I thought I should lighten it up) of this theory then commit some time to it. If you don't, keep harping on and your intentions will be revealed.

Ah.... Hmm.

In answer to your direct question about the images I posted concerning the Saturn polar vortex storm: The first one is an image of a computer simulation that was performed by an academic team with access to a supercomputer. The second one is a photograph of my AnAtmoSphere Terella producing a similar pattern. It is _not_ a purposeful simulation of the polar vortex on Saturn, it is a configuration of electrically produced plasma inside an evacuated chamber that takes on the broad outlines of the Saturn group of storms. I believe that motions on a cosmic scale are influenced not only by gravity but also by electrical and magnetic forces, along the lines of the Electric Universe hypotheses of Wal Thornhill and David Talbot, and others. Many things happen in my Terella, and in Birkeland's before me, that look very  much like larger scale events in the cosmos. The plasma configuration resembling the polar vorticial storms on Saturn is an example. But in the Saturn case there is more than just electrical stuff happening, there is also a lot of gravity, Coriolis effect, vertical convection and the rest, and it is _these_ that produce the vortices, while the overall electrical field _may_ be producing the larger hexagonal  outline. Maybe.

As to the rest of your post... I won't rise to that bait, sorry. There are one or two or three genuine scientists posting on this forum and even in this thread. Respect is given where respect is due, and ditto disrespect. May I suggest that you go back to the very beginning of this thread and read the whole thing?


TinselKoala

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on August 21, 2014, 09:00:17 PM
I can't help but notice that whenever HighforMiles is put in an awkward position because of a video, he shuts the fuck up.


When i asked you to explain this one  ((((   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FBS2bE8-CmE     )))     you said:
"I dont know".   




   Its very simple, so explain it bitch.

On the other hand, you of course know everything. The phrase "I Don't Know" has probably never crossed your mind.

Yet you cannot explain several things I have challenged you to explain, and your other "explanations" are so much word salad gobbledegook, and cannot be used to engineer anything.