Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

Quote from: gravityblock on August 22, 2014, 08:22:53 PM
The FLIR video is displaying how charge channeling through the magnet radiates heat, similar to how the earth radiates heat.  Current core theory is that the magnetic field is created by a rotating, convecting core made of a highly conducting element like iron. To reverse a field created that way, the entire core would have to begin rotating the other direction, just for a start. Not only do we have no evidence of that, we have no mechanism for that. In a planet that continues to spin west to east, why and how would its core reverse? This just shows once again that core theory is non-mechanical and anti-empirical.  Since charge channelling is the cause of internal heating, we no longer have an insoluble problem with magnetism. We do not have to reverse the spin of the core, we only have to reverse the summed spins on the photons moving through.

Charge coming to the Sun from the galactic core can be either photons or anti-photons, the ambient field of the entire Solar System can vary.  Depending on what patch of greater charge the Sun is moving through in the galaxy, our local ambient field can sum either plus or minus.  The nearer it sums to zero, the less magnetism we have, and the further from zero it sums, the more magnetism.  When we move from a patch of plus to a patch of minus, the new patch will tamp down the old magnetism, and that is all we are seeing in the recent cycle.  Magnetism, like heat, is not a result of any dynamo in the core.  It is a result of charge channelling through the Earth.

Reference:  What Causes the Earth's Heat? Answer: CHARGE, by Miles Mathis  (Snapshots shown below)

Gravock

GB,

With regard to the time slots 0:20 to 0:21 and again at 1:07 to 1:08 in the FLIR video, do you see any difference in the magnet's temperature compared to its holding fixture, the CRT, or in the latter time slot, the ambient in general?

FLIR video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJvIMU7JYM

PW

Also:  Note how at 1:14 the less reflective sticker attached to the magnet is indicated as being at ambient.  The heat from the FLIR is not reflecting as well from the stickers surface as it does from the magnet's shiny metal plating. 

Or, are we to believe that the magnetic field cannot penetrate the applied sticker?


gravityblock

Quote from: sadang on August 21, 2014, 05:51:42 AM
Or more correct like this one, because the Sun's path is also a helix around the galactic center!
   There is no single straight line in the entire universe!

- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QU19Ovg-ifY

Yes, and the publication I referenced on the helical helix orbit of the solar system, also confirms how the sun moves helically on its own orbit around the Star of Polaris (snapshot of page 150, as shown in the pdf).

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

gravityblock

Quote from: picowatt on August 22, 2014, 08:49:22 PM
GB,

With regard to the time slots 0:20 to 0:21 and again at 1:07 to 1:08 in the FLIR video, do you see any difference in the magnet's temperature compared to its holding fixture, the CRT, or in the latter time slot, the ambient in general?

FLIR video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qZJvIMU7JYM

PW

Also:  Note how at 1:14 the less reflective sticker attached to the magnet is indicated as being at ambient.  The heat from the FLIR is not reflecting as well from the stickers surface.  Or, are we to believe that the magnetic field cannot penetrate the applied sticker?

Heat is photon density.  The charge field is channelled photons.  In a magnet, more charges (photon/anti-photons) are channelled through the poles and moves through the equator.  In conduction, more charges (photon/anti-photons) are channelled straight through the poles as compared to the equator.  The heat (photon density) from the FLIR is being channelled through the charge field of the magnet, thus the magnet is showing how it's chanelling and radiating the heat through the magnet coming from the FLIR.  It's interesting how the heat from the FLIR is in the IR, as is the charge field.

Gravock
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

picowatt

Quote from: gravityblock on August 22, 2014, 09:32:43 PM
Heat is photon density.  The charge field is channelled photons.  In a magnet, more charges (photon/anti-photons) are channelled through the poles and moves through the equator.  In conduction, more charges (photon/anti-photons) are channelled straight through the poles as compared to the equator.  The heat (photon density) from the FLIR is being channelled through the charge field of the magnet, thus the magnet is showing how it's chanelling and radiating the heat through the magnet coming from the FLIR.  It's interesting how the heat from the FLIR is in the IR, as is the charge field.

Gravock

GB,

So "yes" or "no", do you see the magnet being at a different temperature from its immediate surroundings at the mentioned time slots? (ca 0:20 and 1:07)

As well, how do you account for the lack of indicated heat in the area covered by the sticker at 1:14?

PW