Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

What if it isn't moving at all? Do you know what a standing wave is?

ALL TRANSVERSE electrical and magnetic phenomena are a "VORTEX"

They necessitatively RECIPROCATE around a dielectric "point"


Its simplex pressure gradient mediation. 



The point that you and that other person, the retard Tinfoilhat failed to do is CORRECTLY DEFINE the word "vortex"


You havent, you cant, .......you might do it, but he has no chance of intelligently deducing its definition.   Hes a goddamn fool's fool.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Harnessing Magnetic Vortices for Making Nanoscale Antennas 

Retarded KUNTS like Tinfoilhat and Highformiles  ignore a mountain of evidence



They dont even have a DENOTATION of the term "VORTEX", ........at BEST they have CRUDE CONNOTATIONS in their booze riddled minds. 




Gyromagnetic precession ALONE more than proves a magnetic vortex,........NOT TO MENTION being able to SEE same under a ferrocell.

Theyre retards

Their minds are closed shitholes,  old castle privys where only turds fall.





They dont even know the diff. between "MAGNET" and "MAGNETISM"


all atoms are MAGNETIC in field, obviously so.


They dont even know the definition of MAGNET.    A collection of polarized (as are all atoms) atoms that are COHERENTLY polarized.






********IF these demented fucks had 2 brain cells, they could extrapolate that gyromagnetic precession NECESSITATES a VORTEX DEFINITIONALLY


but, hey, theyre IDIOTS.

[MileHigh]

Kenny:

Look at these four clips please:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gdh2srqH57M
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w41Zijsv46o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcVzfTAK8fk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bG2aQUD8xt0

Chances are they explain a lot of the observations that you incorrectly label as a "magnetic vortex."

The closest thing that you can call a "vortex" when it comes to magnetic fields is that magnetic fields form closed loops.

Unfortunately for you there isn't a single shred of evidence that the magnetic field itself is a vortex.  You are half hoodwinking yourself and half being hoodwinked by Mother Nature.   And the vast majority of your technical prose is babble talk.

MileHigh

[pinestone]

ALL TRANSVERSE electrical and magnetic phenomena are a "VORTEX"

They necessitatively RECIPROCATE around a dielectric "point"


Its simplex pressure gradient mediation. 



The point that you and that other person, the retard Tinfoilhat failed to do is CORRECTLY DEFINE the word "vortex"


You havent, you cant, .......you might do it, but he has no chance of intelligently deducing its definition.   Hes a goddamn fool's fool.

Riddle me this:
Whats the difference between an electromagnetic force and an electromagnetic wave?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Riddle me this:
Whats the difference between an electromagnetic force and an electromagnetic wave?

If you think there is a diff. then youre wrong, there is no diff.



All waves are spatial divergent FORCES



ALL




There are only 2 principles in the Cosmos:


1. Inertia and acceleration  (principle and attribute)...........(CONVERGENCE)

2. Force and motion    (DIVERGENCE)




Force is merely the loss of inertia as expressed in the creation of space, or incorrectly deemed "a spatial phenomena"


however no force is "in space", rather creates space as a posterior attribute.   BIG diff.


copyright 11-2014 Ken L W.