Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

  Quantum mechanics is a way that those behaviors can be accounted for.  If you want to replace it with something that you think is better,

it DOESNT explain same at ALL.


Unless you think Unicorns are an explanation, Errrr, i meant 'virtual particles'.

Replace it with what is both LOGICAL , RATIONAL, and the premise of Tesla, Steinmetz, Faraday, JC Maxwell???

YES, Absofuckinglutely.

Except that we can and do build things that readily detect that energy flow.

FALLACY HELL 101 

"electron microscopes"  WORK, yet have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with showering targets with particles/electrons


An EXPERIMENT is one thing

An (accurate) EXPLANATION is another thing. 



I see you havent learned that yet.




The 'electron microscope' lie
     "Because the SEM (scanning electron microscope) utilizes vacuum conditions and uses 'electrons' to form an image, special preparations must be applied to the sample. All water must be removed from the samples because the water would vaporize in the vacuum. All metals are conductive and require no preparation before being used. All non-metals need to be made conductive by covering the sample with a thin layer of conductive material. This is done by using a device called a "sputter coater". The sputter coater uses an electric field and argon gas. The sample is placed in a small chamber that is at a vacuum. Argon gas and an electric field cause an 'electron' to be removed from the argon, making the atoms positively charged. The argon ions then become attracted to a negatively charged gold foil. The argon ions knock gold atoms from the surface of the gold foil. These gold atoms fall and settle onto the surface of the sample producing a thin gold coating "

     Only conductive (metal) samples are suitable for "electron" microscopy untreated, all other samples are metal treated to prevent them from burning up in the intense dielectric beam. The resulting image is therefore of the metal coating or stain and not the original sample! Never believe a relativist telling you he's "shooting his electron gun". A metal dielectric reflector of a once living organism is not the original sample nor are there electrons scanning it. This device in reality is a dielectric scanning reflector, which produces fine images as only reflected off metal surfaces. The very focusing beams of these microscope are constrictor "lenses" of dielectric flux lines.

.  Quantum mechanics is a way that those behaviors can be accounted for.

QUANTUM bullshit has never even defined a FIELD   

Not even ATTEMPTED to do same.


The entire mechanics of the cosmos, 100 FUCKING %, is FIELD or FIELD modalities and  PARTICLE FREE


Repeat this until you get it ---"FIELDS ARE NOT PARTICLES"


Repeat this until you get it--- "FIELDS DONT HAVE SHIT TO DO WITH PARTICLES"


Repeat this until you get it--- "FIELDS ARE PARTICLE-FREE INERTIA AND FORCE VECTORS, and 100% OF COSMIC MECHANICS"


Repeat this until you get it--- "FIELDS ARE NOWHERE, NOWAY, NO-FUCKING-HOW EXPLAINED EVEN 1% BY ANY BRANCH OF THE CULT OF QUANTUM"




Quantum:::::  A sick RELIGION based upon Einsteins "wave-particle duality" bullshit that doesnt even explain 1% of Cosmic mechanics, which are FIELDS

"All literature on this subject (relativity) is futile and destined to oblivion. So are also all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the Ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena (of gravity, etc.)" – N. Tesla

[TinselKoala]

Oh come on, MarkE, ask him something _hard_. Let him show predictions of some physical parameters with the accuracy of QED's predictions of those quantities.

Quantum electrodynamics (QED), a relativistic quantum field theory of electrodynamics, is among the most stringently tested theories in physics.
The most precise and specific tests of QED consist of measurements of the electromagnetic fine structure constant, α, in various physical systems. Checking the consistency of such measurements tests the theory.
Tests of a theory are normally carried out by comparing experimental results to theoretical predictions. In QED, there is some subtlety in this comparison, because theoretical predictions require as input an extremely precise value of α, which can only be obtained from another precision QED experiment. Because of this, the comparisons between theory and experiment are usually quoted as independent determinations of α. QED is then confirmed to the extent that these measurements of α from different physical sources agree with each other.
The agreement found this way is to within ten parts in a billion (10⁻⁸), based on the comparison of the electron anomalous magnetic dipole moment and the Rydberg constant from atom recoil measurements as described below. This makes QED one of the most accurate physical theories constructed thus far.
Besides these independent measurements of the fine-structure constant, many other predictions of QED have been tested as well.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_tests_of_QED


Of course all those tests are carried out and published by idiots, aren't they? And the people who believe in those idiots and their idiotic theories, who design computers that work, who design things like FLIR cameras, who design airplanes and the computers and software that fly them, who design cellphones and global positioning satellites and robotic spacecraft missions to Titan and Pluto ... they are all idiots too. How do we know this? Why, because some silly internet plagiarist poser _says they are_.



Cue another string of gobbledegook and pottymouth eight-year-old child's invective from you-know-who:

[TinselKoala]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_electron_microscopy

Where's the conductive metal coating?

[TheoriaApophasis]

, a relativistic quantum field

I love it when shit is piled on top of shit that was NEVER explained to begin with.


QUANTUM::::

1. Never explains a field.

2. PILES ON TOP of "field" by another fuck-nothing lexicon with: """"relativistic quantum field"""""


Haaaaaa!!!  Oh my fucking god, im going to piss myself!!!


Quantum = virtual particles (for which not ONE iota of proof exists)

Field =  The term "Quantum BS" has never ever ever EVER at ANY time EVER defined, explained or denotated!!


Put the two together and you get "QUANTUM FIELD" !!


A double "fuck you" which totals to  = NOTHING WHATSOEVER 

[TheoriaApophasis]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transmission_electron_microscopy

Where's the conductive metal coating?

TEM is capacitance charged coupling reflectance imaging






Thanks for feeding support.     its wonderful when some idiot posts something in opposition which in fact only validates the other's logical prior!