Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Quantum electrodynamics (QED), a relativistic quantum field theory of electrodynamics, is among the most stringently tested theories in physics.
The most precise and specific tests of QED consist of measurements of the electromagnetic fine structure constant, α, in various physical systems. Checking the consistency of such measurements tests the theory.
Tests of a theory are normally carried out by comparing experimental results to theoretical predictions. In QED, there is some subtlety in this comparison, because theoretical predictions require as input an extremely precise value of α, which can only be obtained from another precision QED experiment. Because of this, the comparisons between theory and experiment are usually quoted as independent determinations of α. QED is then confirmed to the extent that these measurements of α from different physical sources agree with each other.
The agreement found this way is to within ten parts in a billion (10−8), based on the comparison of the electron anomalous magnetic dipole moment and the Rydberg constant from atom recoil measurements as described below. This makes QED one of the most accurate physical theories constructed thus far.
Besides these independent measurements of the fine-structure constant, many other predictions of QED have been tested as well.

I love that FUCK quote from Wikipedia!!!


Of course if you ACTUALLY READ IT,  youll see it NOWHERE, NOWAY explains what a FIELD is


idiot asshole       

[TheoriaApophasis]

This makes QED one of the most accurate physical theories constructed thus far.

LETS examine that fucking BULLSHIT CLAIM!!!



the very book itself  QED , STRANGE THEORY OF LIGHT AND MATTER by the mental midget Feynman (anti-christ to logic and common sense)


     That Feynman and others have declared (as he has done in his mystical book: QED strange theory of light and matter) that magnetism is mediated by "virtual photons" is no different than the Pope declaring mother Marry as healing a sick child from a pendant worn at the neck. Humanity has placed, as dept. chairs in countless universities and likewise, heads of mathematics and physics, people who are quite literally insane, are deep thinkers, but insane ones. The insane asylums of the world are full of genuinely deep thinkers, however it is not for sake of deep thinking they are locked up and away from others! So, taking a cue from Quantum mysticism we then ask the expert (fool) relativist "since you declare magnetism to be mediated by 'virtual photons', what is same?".

Answer received? Yes, here we have it: "A virtual particle is an abstraction, which facilitates in calculations and understanding, the term is very vague and loosely defined, they never appear as inputs or outputs of experiments, their existence is questionable at best,...however they are very useful in rendering concepts and making equations balance out".  Well, insanity has been reified, at last!"  - QED


Ok, that makes sense!!! (in a parallel universe where insanity = sanity)   


QED PRIEST says:::: "when common sense fails (to explain things rationally), uncommon sense must be created" L. Susskind.

QED PRIEST says::::  "Where common sense and intuition failed, we (the insane relativists) had to create a new form of intuition based upon abstract (unreal) mathematics. When common sense fails, we must create uncommon sense." -Leonard Susskind, professor theoretical physics, and priest of the cult of Quantum

QED PRIEST says::::  "Everything we call real is made up of things that cannot be real." – N. Bohr

QED PRIEST says::::   "The more you see how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us to make a model that explains even the how the most simple phenomena works. Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit." – R. Feynman


Haaaa!!!!   


Translation :  "Insanity and illogical BS is actually logical !!!"


The two greatest sins committed in so-called science in the past hundred years are convincing the ignorant many folk to believe that:
1. Space and time are genuine entities rather than conceptions and attributal abstractions; and that they mediate action at a distance and are the medium or field itself.
2. The fantastical invention of virtual particles, and massless beads that mediate gravity, light EM, and magnetism. Such nonsense offends the mind of even a drunkard and a child. Concepts and non-existent particles have no place in the mechanics of the cosmos or of rational physics.




Again::::: -------      "how nature behaves..............Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit." – R. Feynman

WHAT THE FUCK??

   "how nature behaves..............Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit." – R. Feynman


YEAH, he said that   




Below: The absolute demented insanity of R. Feynman as to the mechanics of magnetism, ala 'virtual photons' and QED. This vile filth not only has a cult following but actually passes in and through the circles of presumed 'educated academia'. Such radical insanity is both absurd, laughable, and puts the trash produced by cults to shame in the arena of unbelievable nonsense. Such pathetic trash presses the credulity of even little children who put more faith in their imaginary friends that such nonsense.

[MarkE]

it DOESNT explain same at ALL.

I said it accounts for the behaviors.  It predicts the behaviors very accurately.  If you have an example that disputes that, then show that example and we can discuss it.

Unless you think Unicorns are an explanation, Errrr, i meant 'virtual particles'.

Replace it with what is both LOGICAL , RATIONAL, and the premise of Tesla, Steinmetz, Faraday, JC Maxwell???

YES, Absofuckinglutely.

You keep saying that.  Please show how classical E/M can for example explain the observations of Hertz' P/E experiments?  How systems governed by continuous, linear differential equations exhibit step-wise behaviors?

FALLACY HELL 101 

"electron microscopes"  WORK, yet have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with showering targets with particles/electrons


An EXPERIMENT is one thing

An (accurate) EXPLANATION is another thing. 



I see you havent learned that yet.

Hurling insults at me does not impress me. 

The 'electron microscope' lie
     "Because the SEM (scanning electron microscope) utilizes vacuum conditions and uses 'electrons' to form an image, special preparations must be applied to the sample. All water must be removed from the samples because the water would vaporize in the vacuum. All metals are conductive and require no preparation before being used. All non-metals need to be made conductive by covering the sample with a thin layer of conductive material. This is done by using a device called a "sputter coater". The sputter coater uses an electric field and argon gas. The sample is placed in a small chamber that is at a vacuum. Argon gas and an electric field cause an 'electron' to be removed from the argon, making the atoms positively charged. The argon ions then become attracted to a negatively charged gold foil. The argon ions knock gold atoms from the surface of the gold foil. These gold atoms fall and settle onto the surface of the sample producing a thin gold coating "

     Only conductive (metal) samples are suitable for "electron" microscopy untreated, all other samples are metal treated to prevent them from burning up in the intense dielectric beam. The resulting image is therefore of the metal coating or stain and not the original sample! Never believe a relativist telling you he's "shooting his electron gun". A metal dielectric reflector of a once living organism is not the original sample nor are there electrons scanning it. This device in reality is a dielectric scanning reflector, which produces fine images as only reflected off metal surfaces. The very focusing beams of these microscope are constrictor "lenses" of dielectric flux lines.

That sounds like you are trying to sell Eric Dollard's "dielectricity".  I've never seen any convincing experiments that establish Dollard's ideas over convention electromagnetics.

QUANTUM bullshit has never even defined a FIELD   

Not even ATTEMPTED to do same.


The entire mechanics of the cosmos, 100 FUCKING %, is FIELD or FIELD modalities and  PARTICLE FREE


Repeat this until you get it ---"FIELDS ARE NOT PARTICLES"


Repeat this until you get it--- "FIELDS DONT HAVE SHIT TO DO WITH PARTICLES"


Repeat this until you get it--- "FIELDS ARE PARTICLE-FREE INERTIA AND FORCE VECTORS, and 100% OF COSMIC MECHANICS"


Repeat this until you get it--- "FIELDS ARE NOWHERE, NOWAY, NO-FUCKING-HOW EXPLAINED EVEN 1% BY ANY BRANCH OF THE CULT OF QUANTUM"




Quantum:::::  A sick RELIGION based upon Einsteins "wave-particle duality" bullshit that doesnt even explain 1% of Cosmic mechanics, which are FIELDS

"All literature on this subject (relativity) is futile and destined to oblivion. So are also all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the Ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena (of gravity, etc.)" – N. Tesla

Again, if you've got a theory that can clear the three hurdles, then let's take them one at a time.

[MarkE]

TEM is capacitance charged coupling reflectance imaging






Thanks for feeding support.     its wonderful when some idiot posts something in opposition which in fact only validates the other's logical prior!

Why do you say that TEM is "reflectance imaging"? In TEM is not the imaging device on the far side of the sample from the illuminating energy source?  What reflects to get to the imaging device?

[TheoriaApophasis]

I said it accounts for the behaviors.  It predicts the behaviors very accurately.

Hyperbolic fallacy,....... I can say "insanity accounts for insane behavior"

MEANINGLESS 



Predicts WHAT?     It cannot even predict particle free action at a distance!!!!

The Cult of Quantum even ADMITS THIS FACT    


Next!!

trying to sell Eric Dollard's "dielectricity"

Are you honestly fucking DEMENTED???


Electrostatics, ie dielectricity is the CORNERSTONE OF:::::


FARADAY
STEINMETZ
O. HEAVISIDE
JC MAXWELL
TESLA



Holy shit, I cant believe you even said something that pathetic.