Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

TA,

Do you even understand what it was regarding the photoelectric effect that classical E/M theory could not explain?

I ask because in all you have discussed regarding the photoelectric effect, you never seem to address that issue.

PW

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on February 12, 2015, 09:24:53 PM
TA,

Do you even understand what it was regarding the photoelectric effect that classical E/M theory could not explain?


false premise, comparing and contrasting shit with another flavor of shit.


both EM classical theory AND the GR / QM explanation of PE are FLAWED



Ive already cited Tesla on the nature of EM/ Light to you.


but you never read it.


picowatt

TA,

Is that a "no", as in you don't understand what the problem was that classical E/M could not explain regarding the photoelectric effect?

PW

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on February 12, 2015, 09:43:00 PM
TA,

Is that a "no", as in you don't understand what the problem was that classical E/M could not explain regarding the photoelectric effect?

PW


strawman fallacy.   Nice bullshit attempt.


nobody
(accurately) explained the PE effect until I wrote about it 6 months ago.


The WP "packet" was accurately explained 6 months ago by myself and 100% accurately explains the TEM circuit of EM capacitance in the circuit of light proportional to frequency


the Maxwellian/Lorentz force classical descriptions fail, likewise so did Einstein's


Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/can-maxwells-em-theory-explain-the-photoelectric-effect.408503/


Now, ask yourself WHY Heaviside invented the coaxial cable and HOW its connected to the nature of the Trifold circuit of light.

picowatt

TA,

I watched your video presentation regarding the photoelectric effect that you posted quite some time ago.  I recall you pounding on the chalkboard with your chalk stating "the more pulses the more power" or something to that effect.

No where in that video did you address the issue regarding the photoelectric effect that classical E/M could not explain.

That is why I asked if you understood what the problem was at the time that classical E/M could not explain regarding the photoelectric effect.

Do you understand what that problem was?

PW