Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 11 Guests are viewing this topic.

MarkE

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on February 12, 2015, 11:39:01 PM

its 0-9712541-8-4
Thanks.

Statements like this from page 103 seem to miss the mark:

QuoteAs is the nature of dielectricity, the smaller the space, the MORE dielectricity that can be stored, this is why the frequency of an
"electromagnetic" bounding geometry is directly proportional to its dielectric capacitance. This is evidenced in the dielectroelectromagnetic
effect (wrongly conceived of as the photoelectric effect) where frequency is proportional to the energy propagated.

How does this dielectricity concept deal with the observed step-wise behavior of the photo-electric effect?

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: MarkE on February 13, 2015, 12:00:10 AM
How does this dielectricity concept deal with the observed step-wise behavior of the photo-electric effect?

The multiphoton photoelectric THEORY as per the PE effect is a brain fart miscomprehension of TEM PHASE and COHERENCY   (circular, linear, polarized or NOT polarized).


Likewise, you keep forgetting the 'PHOTON' is the unreal invention of Einstein and his demonic kin.

The WP "packet" is an unreal theory that doesnt exist  ( as implicative of the so-called 'photon').


constructive phase, or destructive TEM phasing isnt even explained by GR or QM as to additive power in coherent force phenomena (such as coherent light)......much less the PE effect.



Mult-axial non polarized constructive TEM is the basis of the BS "multi-photon" PE effect THEORY

MarkE

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on February 13, 2015, 12:11:13 AM
The multiphoton photoelectric THEORY as per the PE effect is a brain fart miscomprehension of TEM PHASE and COHERENCY   (circular, linear, polarized or NOT polarized).


Likewise, you keep forgetting the 'PHOTON' is the unreal invention of Einstein and his demonic kin.

The WP "packet" is an unreal theory that doesnt exist  ( as implicative of the so-called 'photon').


constructive phase, or destructive TEM phasing isnt even explained by GR or QM as to additive power in coherent force phenomena (such as coherent light)......much less the PE effect.



Mult-axial non polarized constructive TEM is the basis of the BS "multi-photon" PE effect THEORY
I read your sections on the photo-electric effect and your ideas fail to explain the behavior.  Now, it is always possible that I missed something, so why don't you show a numerical example of how your ideas properly predict the detected radiation emitted from a material of your choice only when stimulated with radiation below a threshold wavelength?

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: MarkE on February 13, 2015, 12:44:55 AM
Now, it is always possible that I missed something, so why don't you show a numerical example of how your ideas properly predict the detected radiation emitted from a material of your choice only when stimulated with radiation below a threshold wavelength?


pretty dense arent ya?


said threshold is merely the limit of capacitance (anode etc plate) which releases energy.

The electric field can only 'soak into the medium' at the rate defined by that medium. Light can only travel at luminal velocity as defined by the dielectric medium and its dimensional relation of one over c square, a numeric constant. Light is not a material projection, it is an inductive process

MarkE

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on February 13, 2015, 12:54:41 AM

pretty dense arent ya?


said threshold is merely the limit of capacitance (anode etc plate) which releases energy.

The electric field can only 'soak into the medium' at the rate defined by that medium. Light can only travel at luminal velocity as defined by the dielectric medium and its dimensional relation of one over c square, a numeric constant. Light is not a material projection, it is an inductive process
Your explanation so far does not account for the existence of a threshold.  Please supply an example with the attendant math where from the material properties as you claim they exist a threshold is derived that matches any known photo electric effect experiments.