Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken, 

S. Sarg is a "Etheorist".. 
I have his books ...

Acca...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUWVHa9kOoU

Awesome stuff!!

Did you see the 7 VIDEO Dewey B Larson series I just uploaded?


GREAT STUFF!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ATOF1RBlWY

[sadang]

Joel, stop thinking about the seen and unseen Universe, at its macro and micro levels as something external to yourself. Start with this mental exercise in the beginning. Try to accommodate with this fundamental concept, and only through this new vision try now to see the actual human concepts of space, time, fields, waves, frequency, forces and so on. All current human concepts! An even your own conscious existence!

Without this first but fundamental exercise will not even touch the real senses of the Universe. Without this exercise will just continue to shape the reality according to minds, concepts and will of others, turning yourself into a circle of ideas in a closed system, outside of the universal laws of manifestation, which is not even your own circle. And since nothing is static in the universe, it follow naturally to manifest yourself accordingly.

Ken bring many glimpses in the actual ocean of the lack of real knowledge, of materialistic and mechanistic current totally wrong view and understanding of the Universe. But in its intimate nature the Universe is not that at all! And you already sense it! Keep going on your own path!

[profitis]

Theoria: 'The 'photon' is a purely arbitrary concept. Einstein wrongly concluded light was a discrete wave-packet. He called such a wave-packet a 'light quanta'.

Light, in fact, is D.E.M (dielectroelectromagnetic),a tri-fold circuit.'


Me:somebody has to give these wobblies a name right?. Can your trifold oscillation not be classified under the same title :wave-packet? Can your trifold not also behave as a particle sometimes? 

[TheoriaApophasis]

Can your trifold not also behave as a particle sometimes?

No, but it CAN and DOES act with SOME OF the same attributes and properties of particles


and hence the original confusion (of Einstein, and his demon kinsmen)



All of quantum BS grew out of the  "is it a wave??  is it a particle??"   BRAIN FART.


Light has a QUALITY (property of) of 'particle LIKE' properties....

but the idiots of Einstein and his ilk said  it is the QUANTITY (=QUANTUM) , or QUANTA of (quasi-)-Particles

which the idiot Einstein called "DAS LICHTQUANT"  [light quanta-ty]............((((  Lichtquant oder Lichtteilchen )))))




Now, ask yourself why low frequency COHERENT light can be so destructive in low wattage.

whereas the same wattage of Incoherent light is useless even to read a paper by.



Then ask yourself why high frequency light and coherent light is both powerful and dangerous.

then finally ask yourself , deductively, what the link therein between the two is.



NEITHER frequency NOR coherency as pertains the Electrical OR the Magnetic component of light are power multipliers

So.....................(insert answer)

[profitis]

Theoria:'Our modern SHIT science ABSOLUTELY (and wrongly) thinks all forces require a particle at SOME DIRECT level.

but thats just their goddamn Atomistic premise.'

Lol.this is the HUMAN first-instinct tendency my friend.comes from everyday life experience/survival.we don't question our perceptions which is why I love the wave-particle idea so much as it fucks ones mind.