Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

So, we cleared one assumption: the "rotating magnetic field": it's yours, not Tesla's idea.

I said no such fucking bullshit.  



Tesla mentions the "rotating magnetic field"  COUNTLESS times, and NOT in reference to his invention.


Further still......Tesla followed Faraday's premise in FULL and Faraday mentions the rotating magnetic field endlessly.


I said the (full) explanation of the Magnet and of magnetism is MINE.

[TheoriaApophasis]

You must add something else: all those basic entities have no mass, and an atom as a whole has.

Brain dead arent ya?   


Ignorantly and in error GR and QM have declared 99.9999999% of an atom is "empty space", .......when in fact not even .00000001% of it is empty, ....it's a magneto-dielectric dynamo driven by enormous nucleal rotary spin and charges.


JUST UNDER 100% of the physical/phenomena in the universe (of matter/mass) is propped up by magnetism, logically and OBVIOUSLY SO.


now, deduce the REST of the picture.


If the atom were 99.999999% empty space as the priests of the cult of quantum advocate, then their non-existent electrons would
spiral into the nucleus. All atoms, as is necessary to understanding the magnet itself, are multifaceted 'balloons' with magnetic and
dielectric charges throughout. There isn't even .00000000001% of 'empty space' in the atomic structure. To believe in quantum is just
placing false beliefs based upon nothing


For example the Schwarzschild solution of the presumed inertia of a mass can assume any value depending upon the spatial
coordinates. Inertia is pre-extant to any and all phenomena and inertia likewise cannot be quantified based upon bodies or masses.
That presumed fallacious 99.9999999999% of 'nothing' or 'empty space' at the inter-atomic of every atom accounts for 100% of the
energy released at the explosion of a nuclear device, NOT the conversion of any matter into energy. If this does not define inertia for
you as being wholly separate from phenomena, then nothing will. As such, from the idiocy of Einstein and others 100% of "nothing"
is in fact responsible for 100% of the power and energy released in a nuclear blast. As per wisdom, the world still exists deep in the
dark. Here we can see that the general theory of insanity as posited by Einstein and parroted by others as per "inertial mass" (a pure
contradiction) depends upon the spatial dimensional coordinates of that mass and therefore has no ultimate meaning whatsoever.
Likewise therefore the assertion of the equivalency of mass and inertia is purely insane and wholly untrue. Inertia has neither
magnitude, space, nor direction, only divergent magnetic fields do. This magnetism is movement, is phenomena, is discharge. What is
potential, inertia, goes unseen and unknown and is without measure in the absolute sense and as the Absolute. The 'unspooling' of
counterspatial inertia in discharge as magnetism, just like a spring unwinding creates space, this space is movement, is motion. All that
presumed 'empty space' is a motional after-shock of inertia in discharge, waiting to be voided. All motion, all space must terminate
and end, even if it persists for an incalculable seeming eternity, it will terminate in reversal, the movement (spatial reversal) into
counterspace. What is potential is not actual. What is actual or actualized is the unspooling of potential and the 'winding' up of
movement. Motion and space are both (one and the same) the mirage of inertia in phenomenal actualization


The most insane premise of all atomic models, either the debunked 'cloud' model or the planetary model both, is their mutual
vociferous agreement that "most of an atom is 99.999999% empty space" (between the nucleus and the charged(ing) boundaries). This
cannot be enjoined, logically or experimentally and is contrary to all observed phenomena and experimentation. Between the nucleus
and the charging boundaries is the spatial and counterspatial 'air' (Ether), which, analogously, props up the highly stable (in most
cases) atomic structure, that being magnetism and the dielectricity. The rotary inner vortexes inside (rather between) the atomic
'sphere' (complex atomic geometries actually) is a micro-turbine which induces charge, discharges, has capacitance, inductance, and
has counter-to-counterspatial magnetism to prevent complete atomic dismemberment.
The atomic radius of different elements is specifically related to the magnetic-dielectric pressures within the atomic geometry. The
larger noble gasses have greater internal magnetism, low dielectricity and resultantly have very low reactivity with other elements.
The nucleal and the geometric charged (discharging) boundaries are atomic terminals, like a battery. Electrification affects this spatialcounterspatial
geometry and likewise affects the spatial magnetism within it. Even in the 'encapsulated balloon' model of the atom of
QM, the supposed 'balloon' has no 'air'. The particle theory of atomic geometry must be summarily dismissed; it is by its very nature
nothing more than rehashed Greek Atomism.

[pedromarcus]

Do you come up with any mechanism that could explain paranormal phenomena? Is it something the operator "sends" like electromagnetism, r would be wholly outside space and time altogether? 

[TheoriaApophasis]

Do you come up with any mechanism that could explain paranormal phenomena? Is it something the operator "sends" like electromagnetism, r would be wholly outside space and time altogether? 

you know very well Ive written several articles on same. 



only our modern day bullshit science has made 'science / physics'   ONE THING,.... and metaphysics another.


Plato and the ancient Pythagoreans and their kinsmen laughed at such a notion that these were 2 diff. things.



100% of modern scientific deduction, retroduction, induction, and the entire spectrum of scientific investigative method is BASED upon Greek Pythagorean and Platonic methodologies....

[pedromarcus]

Only one that touched on the mechanism about ghosts, but you never to. MY knowledge gave an explanation as to how it works. I mean, PK for example. Whats involved in the moving of the object froma distance