Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

joel321

TA, I'm king of seeing everything as a vortex. I'm king of seeing all waves vortexing. Is not just magnetic fields but everything. Our milky way is supposedly being eaten by a black hole in the center. So I ask myself, if the milky way a vortex, what keeps on feeding the vortex if we are still alive? My logistic way of looking at it is that is has to be some tipe of drak matter wave that sacrifices itselt to keep on the milky way living longer. Because if nothing was stading in the way of the 'black' hole the milky way would have being sucked in a matter of seconds due to the 'black holes'" 'suction.

Still if there is a 'black hole' in the center of the milky way, there has to be a 'white' hole (opposite wave).

Magnetic forces are ONLY perceived by eye sight. Which is only our eye waves being able to perceived. Hard to explain but just when you know that the ears are blind to the eyes and the eyes are deaf to the ears is when things start to make sense. I cannot see with my ears and I cannot hear with my eyes. I can only see and hear when both ear and eye perceptions come to the center of a wave. Hard to explain. But if I was blind and deaf, I would not know anything.

minnie




  If a photon cannot be brought to rest there's no way to know if it
had rest mass or not!
                 John.

Qwert

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on February 15, 2015, 02:08:25 PM

I said no such fucking bullshit.
  ;D



Tesla mentions the "rotating magnetic field"  COUNTLESS times, and NOT in reference to his invention.


Further still......Tesla followed Faraday's premise in FULL and Faraday mentions the rotating magnetic field endlessly.


I said the (full) explanation of the Magnet and of magnetism is MINE.

I see: Tesla was just UNABLE to produce such description (his most important discovery); the world had to wait pretty long time for a genius of TheoriaApophasis just to articulate this.

Once again:
Isn't strange that Tesla, who shows pretty great fondness for writings, nowhere describes this phenomenon according to your concept (especially since it's his most important discovery) with his usual details? Can you find another example where he neglects his idea? All available sources show only one main desire in his young age: making a brushless motor and that he accomplished it when he discovered alternating multiphase current. Any Tesla's description of this idea according to your concept?

TinselKoala

QuoteTell me son, ....has GR or QM EVER defined a FIELD?  :o :o ;D ;D  ............NEVER

Chalk up Yet Another falsehood from the Great Genius.

Google refutes you with over 6 million hits.

Start here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_%28physics%29

Of course you will say, in your usual arrogant and insecure manner, that these definitions aren't really definitions. But of course they ARE, and they are used in every day calculations by people (idiots you call them) all over the world who design things that actually work. Your "definition of a definition" isn't really a definition, it's just a self-serving attempt to bolster your own insecure ego.

You do realize by now that your silly claim of the "Free Energy Bismuth Sphere" has been soundly refuted by good experiments, don't you? And did you ever put a link to the original author's post in the Description of the "simple magnet train" video that you copied and posted to your channel as if it were your own work? No, I see you haven't, and that many people still apparently believe that video is your work. Can you spell "Plagiarism?"



TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: Qwert on February 16, 2015, 10:10:57 AM
Isn't strange that Tesla, who shows pretty great fondness for writings, nowhere describes this phenomenon


Youre insane, even Faraday was speaking about rotary magnetic fields.


Theyve been playing with iron dust for long over 100 years now son.



absurd BS.  ;D




"Many statements have appeared in print relative to my discoveries of the rotating magnetic field and invention of the induction motor which I
was compelled to pass in silence." ------TESLA