Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[joel321]

And what is that thing you call electricity? Replacing magnetism with electricity or viceversa will not resolve the equation of their own manifestation. This is just a circular way of thinking, not an ascending one. This way of thinking will not bring nothing new.

All powerful magnets are made powerful with electricity – HENCE all powerful magnets in outer space are made power full due to large amounts of electricity in outer space!

How else can a hand held magnet get magnetized if not by ELECTRICITY?

This a non-sense question! It is available only in a frame of thinking based on the existence of separate things, the observer and the observed phenomena being two separate and distinct things. Wrong premises, wrong development, wrong results!

There is no counterspaces, but only counterspace. Only one! The same counterspace for all forms of its manifestations, even if they can be called by human minds solid, liquid, gas, plasma or other terms invented by human minds. It is a fulcrum for all things know and unknown to conscious and rational human mind.

If you really want to understand things move the observer in the counterspace.

OK sadang, tell me TODAY why the earth is FLOATING in space time?

IF SPACE TIME IS A BLANKET OF SPAVE, what keeps the blanket so thick that the earth does not sink in the abyss of space? I'm not here trying to teach, but I kind of see myself at greater know how than you do and it starts from the ocean! The universe is an ocean. How can it not be? Ok let me rephrase it, the universe is an ELECTRIC ocean.

Sadang, tell me why is the earth floating in the outer space ocean? I would like to hear that sir! I'm pretty sure not a lot of people ask themselves that question. But you seem to be looking past your nose

[TheoriaApophasis]

How else can a hand held magnet get magnetized if not by ELECTRICITY?

magnetic induction. causing dielectric coherency of the mass being induced.

IF SPACE TIME IS A BLANKET OF SPAVE, what keeps the blanket so thick that the earth does not sink in the abyss of space?

Space = NOTHING, its not a field, its not a force, it ACTS on nothing, it DOES nothing.

Sadang, tell me why is the earth floating in the outer space ocean?

it 100% absolutely is doing NO SUCH THING AT ALL


see here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0jHsq36_NTU

[Qwert]

TheoriaApophasis, according to your explanation of the rough definition of "magnetic poles" (or lack of them, i.e. above post), its meaning is roughly the same as the common knowledge/science describes it. You only use somewhat different approach for that issue.

[joel321]

magnetic induction. causing dielectric coherency of the mass being induced.

ALL man made magnets are created with electricity 100% facts. C'mon TA. You should understand that the universe is electric?

Space = NOTHING, its not a field, its not a force, it ACTS on nothing, it DOES nothing.

Space = something like everything else does. C'mon TA. You saying this! As if magnetism came from nothing! Just like everything else comes from NOTHING!

I'm asking you why does not the earth sink in the abysss of space time even if it's billions of pounds heavy?

And you tell me nothing!? But let me allow to learn your point of view since you love magnets

it 100% absolutely is doing NO SUCH THING AT ALL

First of all, the sun is floating in outer space like all the rest of the stars.
The galaxy (milky way) is "floating" too being eating by the "black" hole...unless you can tell me if magnetism is standing on a plane? I'm not arguing that all matter in outer space are spining! WHAT I'M SAYING IS THAT THE UNIVERSE IS ELECTRIC!
The sun has a MAGNETIC ELECTRIC PLASMA GRAVITY FIELD that atracts the planets to it's core due to ELECTRICITY along with GRAVITY and INNERTIA and WINGS!
Even if I see the sun as a vortex attracting all of these planets, you CANNOT tell me that the sun is not BEING "magnetized" by the OUTER phenomena from the dark matter!!! as IF, you are telling me that ONLY magnetism CREATES this phenomena! Well then OK< from where does this MAGNETISM come from? TA< just trying to make you think, BUT all of the magnets you play with are only magnets that have been electrified to become magnets. They have been jolted with electricity to become electrified WITH ELECTRICITY!
NOW, tell me h ow the SUN became electrified with out no human volts? (the universe is electrified=electricity is the universe)
Why would planets follow a SUN?

[TheoriaApophasis]

TheoriaApophasis, according to your explanation of the rough definition of "magnetic poles", its meaning is roughly the same as the common knowledge/science describes it. You only use somewhat different approach for that issue.

just the inverse.     There is NO region or domain that defines a POLE of a magnet, contrary to current denotation AND connotation.


You can slice a magnet a 100000000000000 times vertically, or parallel to 'polarity',......and there is no separation of "poles"

Polarity doesn't imply opposites as in the case of magnetism or the (coherent mass we call) magnet....., rather the INVERSE of counterspace,  ie the creation of SPACE and ANTINOMIES,  there is only one antinomy, the inverse of counterspace.



The "current science" as you put it , parrots the BS that a magnet "has poles", either qualitatively or quantitatively, or both.  But no such nonsense exists.

Duality, or polarity as per magnetism or the MACRO model of same in the magnet is a conceptual reification that there "ARE 2 INVERSE X-ENTITIES (poles)".    But no such nonsense exists.



To define projective geometry, or counterspace, ie Non-Euclidean geometry (which isnt true really, since Euclid DOES INDEED talk about counterspace in his own lexicon, of the INCOMMENSURATE POINT) is to posit its inverse, (the loss of inertia, or discharge) which = SPACE.

Space (=polarity) has no "poles", it is definitionally the inverse of couterspace as defined by TOPOS , coordination from an (imaginary, or specified) point.


People forget that a NATURAL LINE is the extension from a point, not in ONE direction, but INVERSE TO THE POINT.


Directionality (a line) is not FROM a point, but INVERSE TO A POINT.


That curvilinear extension is not a sphere (yet), rather a Hyperboloid,..... and why a hyperboloid and NOT a cylinder?   Inertia and the loss of inertia are not extensions but mutual reciprocities BETWEEN force and inertia.


There isnt one straight line in the entire cosmos, anyone who doesnt understand what a hyperboloid IS or DEFINES is never going to grasp a thing.



Its as insane to say a Magnet "has poles" as it is to say life has a BIRTH pole and a DEATH pole,    both are curvilinear paths defined by divergence and motion thru space and time, the "bubble" of existence.


(inserts a necessary "duhhhhhh" )