Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

BTW, I don't get the deep meaning about that "MAGIC FAUCET". An electric pump is just pushing the water up and b;locking it to go down the clear pipe.

some people cannot grasp analogies and make abstruse connections.

[joel321]

some people cannot grasp analogies and make abstruse connections.

I'm more interested in you telling me why we can see through water or glass? Right now> Sorry if I'm ignoring your other points.

Your eyeballs have a "clear" lens to see. You have to ask yourself, why are the light rays passing straight through the glass and still be a solid.

Sorry to get off topic but that is amazing to me!

Why can we see through solid glass and not through solid metal?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Your eyeballs have a "clear" lens to see. You have to ask yourself, why are the light rays passing straight through the glass and still be a solid.

light / EM passes thru EVERYTHING, depending on the frequency


stop smoking dope

[joel321]

light / EM passes thru EVERYTHING, depending on the frequency

I was just reading an article the other day regarding x-rays. The only way i perceived to understand the x-rays is that they build the light rays pass the matter via a vortex in the middle to make the light not scatter and then due to the light going through he solid then making the other obstacle go back through the "solid" to reflect a light picture.

Now does light passes through itself? lol

I don't smoke dope bro I just ask shit load of questions. 

I have to ask myself that if an eye lens "curves" light, then the same is for any solid matter. A glass (lens) filters out light and a rock filters our more light but light may pass through glass but not enough to see through rocks since we only see due to the light that reflects inside our eyes. = everything that we see is because 99% of it is  due to the items reflecting light in to our eyes. That does not reflect in to our eyes is invisible.

I'm just thinking too much man but I do believe in vortexes in the magnet.

Now I have to go feed my t-rex pet.

[Qwert]

 TA, this excerpt is from your book, page 163/236 of pdf:

"The old method of demonstrating magnetism via iron filings is both horrible and an error since the iron dust undergoes magnetic induction."
"The iron dust undergoes magnetic induction." What's wrong with this? Can you elaborate (explain shortly)? To my knowledge this is exactly why science uses it: to show (imaginary lines of) magnetic induction.

On page 162-163 of the same book, there is a description of ferrocells by Timm A. Vanderelli. I entirely agree with that. But there is nothing about your concept. All those images are still, and according to your concept they should move as "vortex" is associated with movement and your descriptions imply so. Why they are still, not moving? EXPLAIN.