Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[sarkeizen]

those that TALK, and those that DO

You sure talk a lot.

"The more you see how strange nature behaves, the harder it is for us to make a model that explains even the how
the most simple phenomena works. Theoretical physics has given up on this pursuit." – R. Feynman

Yawn.  This is a quote from QED.  The context IMHO is that it's easy to be required to explain the mechanism of ordinary every day events which is beyond the scope of determinism.  In other words you can no longer use metaphors like gears or ping-pong balls to create a model which accounts for all known actions.  So physics opts for a functional model - math that describes how things behave.

[picowatt]

From:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant

Planck discovered that physical action could not take on an arbitrary value.
Instead, the action must be some multiple of a very small quantity
(later to be named the "quantum of action" and now called Planck constant).
This inherent granularity is counterintuitive in the everyday world,
where it is possible to "make things a little bit hotter" or "move things a little bit faster".
This is because the quanta of action are very, very small in comparison to everyday
macroscopic human experience. Hence, the granularity of nature appears smooth to us.

Thus, on the macroscopic scale, quantum mechanics and classical physics converge at
the classical limit. Nevertheless, it is impossible, as Planck discovered, to explain some
phenomena without accepting the fact that action is quantized. In many cases, such
as for monochromatic light or for atoms, this quantum of action also implies that only
certain energy levels are allowed, and values in between are forbidden.[3] In 1923,
Louis de Broglie generalized the Planck–Einstein relation by postulating that the Planck
constant represents the proportionality between the momentum and the quantum
wavelength of not just the photon, but the quantum wavelength of any particle.
This was confirmed by experiments soon afterwards.

Using this, Einstein was able to explain the photelectric effect, which classical physics
could not (and TA's explanation does not).

Quantum mechanics has been tested (and used) for over a hundred years since,
and continues to work very well for predicting the outcome of experiments and
allowing for technological innovation. 

If one could prove that a "quanta" is not necessary to cause action at the very small
scales that quantum mechanics deals with, but instead, that nature is actually linear
and smooth and can be "budged" in any arbitrarily small amount desired, quantum
mechanics would disappear overnight.  Unfortunately (or fortunately), all attempts
to disprove quantum mechanics have, to date, failed.   

[TheoriaApophasis]

v) Ordinary speech doesn't always differentiate between "mostly" and "always and forever" very well.  So iv) applies more often than you think.

yours being the strawman fallacy


You have NOTHING whatsoever to contribute on the topic of this thread.   I dont give a DAMN what you think of me.

Get on topic, or get lost somewhere dark.



Have something logical or intelligent to say on FIELD THEORY or magnetism?  FINE

otherwise go jump in a dark hole.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Using this, Einstein was able to explain the photelectric effect,

dead wrong idiot.    Einstein got REPRODUCABLE QUANTITATIVE results,


his explanation for WHY is 100% wrong.  Of this there is NO DOUBT.



Like a common IDIOT, you confuse  DESCRIBE (accurately, and reproduce same) with an (accurate)  EXPLANATION



The erroneous Einstein mental failure as currently thought of as a "wave packet" is in fact a dielectric pulse in the radial center of EM
propagation. This pulse is proportional to the frequency, the intensity of the EM being emitted as the Z-axis radial-dielectric (wrongly
called photo-electric) charges indicate from experimentation. The Quantum notion of a "wave packet" and the 'photon' do not exist in
the electromagnetic-dielectric model of the EM spectrum. They are phantom misunderstandings of electrodynamics, dielectric
capacitance and reciprocating mutual conjugation by and thru magneto-spatial and dielectric-counterspatial co-axial energy
formations.

The test and results of the photoelectric experiment are, of course, completely accurate and valid,

The explanation however (where myopic pseudo-science fails typically) is a pure insane fantasy, both illogical, irrational, absurd, and purely the insane conclusion of
Einstein's idiocy and his atomistic proclivities. Einstein had absolute NO training or study in electrical theory ala Tesla, Faraday,
Maxwell and others. His only acclaim, his Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect (not its results, but its explanation!) is a complete
lie, fabrication and utter farce in the extreme.

Insanity defined in pure rarefied form: "Photons have no mass, but they have momentum and they have an energy". A massless
mass/particle is an absurd premise in the extreme, in defining the so-called photon, which in reality is a radial dielectric Z-axis
component of the so-called "electromagnetism".

It has inertia (not momentum, which is applicable to mass/matter), it of course has
energy and is the only component of light that is the source for the energy of both its discharge as magnetism, and its magnetodielectric
mirror in transverse composition as electricity in the dielectro-electromagnetic true nature of light. This applies to the entire
'electromagnetic' spectrum. Light itself (as this work expands in form and editions) cannot exist without a Z-axis radial dielectric
component, absolutely no different than the coaxial cable.

[MileHigh]

Note Einstein's theories about massive objects bending light were verified.  There are gravitational lenses all over the sky that confirm this.

Also Kenny, Picowatt is a "doer" and has had a long career in technology.  That's why when he discusses electronics and many other things he can spin circles around you with his eyes closed.  You are definitely accusing the wrong person about not being a "doer."

This entire thread is one big holy swiss cheese that can barely stand up because it's 99% empty space and 1% content.  The real people have been blowing big gaping holes in Kenny's cheese to the point there is almost nothing left.

http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/imagegallery/image_feature_575.html

http://www.dailypaul.com/334775/gravitational-lensing-creates-einsteins-cross-of-distant-supernova