Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

that Nature is instead smooth and linear, able to be "budged" in any arbitrarily
small amount desired? 

ive always said the OPPOSITE

There isnt a SINGLE straight line in the cosmos.

The application of quantum mechanics to the photoelectric effect allowed for the
derivation of mathematical models that describe and predict the photoelectric effect with great
accuracy and are still in use today.

WRONG, the application of accurate QUANTIFIED EFFECTS from observations allows for the derivation of working empirical models.

Your "more pulses equals more power" explanation of the photoelectric
effect (as in one of your videos) is reminiscent of pre-1900 classical mechanics,

Nothing in classical F.T. mechanics has posited what i did.

The term "reminiscent" you used is just vague bullshit.


thats like saying  "CHEAP $5 wine is reminiscent of $10,000 1924 Italian Merlot"

models that describe and predict the photoelectric effect with great
accuracy and are still in use today.

You just HUNG YOUR OWN ASS  dummy   


LEARN these two words idiot


DESCRIBE


and .


EXPLAIN (accurately)




You HONESTLY did just prove that you really ARE THAT DENSE (=stupid)

[picowatt]

TA,

By the by, the Faraday effect, or Faraday rotation, is the rotation of the plane
of polarization of light propagating thru a media in the presence of an applied magnetic field.

I would not say that means a "magnetic field warps light".

[TheoriaApophasis]

TA,

By the by, the Faraday effect, or Faraday rotation, is the rotation of the plane
of polarization of light propagating thru a media in the presence of an applied magnetic field.

I would not say that means a "magnetic field warps light".

sorry, dummy, in fact magnetism DOES warp light.


Likewise Timms 2 inventions,  BOTH PATENTED are BASED UPON SAME 



rotating??? What the goddamn hell did you THINK reciprocating magnetic fields were DOING if not rotating ??

OMFG 


see magnetism warp light:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMssut5ik9A

[TheoriaApophasis]

1: I don't need to be a baker to eat bread.

I can also see you as a member of a JIM JONES like cult.


Youre a sheep,  as a person.





Likewise a BREAD EATER has nothing intelligent to say on the makings of or COMPONENTS of BREAD


So, thanks for setting that one up !!!

[picowatt]

ive always said the OPPOSITE

There isnt a SINGLE straight line in the cosmos.


WRONG, the application of accurate QUANTIFIED EFFECTS from observations allows for the derivation of working empirical models.

Great!  So you do agree with all that "quantum bullshit" as you have called it.

Nothing in classical F.T. mechanics has posited what i did.

The term "reminiscent" you used is just vague bullshit.


thats like saying  "CHEAP $5 wine is reminiscent of $10,000 1924 Italian Merlot"


You just HUNG YOUR OWN ASS  dummy   


LEARN these two words idiot


DESCRIBE


and .


EXPLAIN (accurately)




You HONESTLY did just prove that you really ARE THAT DENSE (=stupid)

Then, to be less kind, I will state that the "more pulses equals more power" explanation you gave in one of your videos is EXACTLY like classical mechanics, which fell short of mathematically describing and predicting the photoelectric effect.