Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

Started by TheoriaApophasis, July 13, 2014, 04:20:12 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

profitis

Its his goal to distance himself from logic and deduction.this way he keeps them suckered (individuals who want to findout more about magnetism and buy books about it)

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: profitis on March 09, 2015, 11:51:53 PM
Its his goal to distance himself from logic and deduction


as a Platonist, and a translator of ancient Greek and a consummate expert in Platonic and Neoplatonic logic, you will NEVER in life run across someone MORE steeped in logical examination than myself.


As such your statement is beyond the pale and "hell and gone" from even the term INSANE.  ;D ;D ;D



tell us all about induction vs. deduction, vs abduction vs retroduction


ill sit back and let you dissect it for us / myself  ;D ;D




Ill presume your idea of "logical" is Virtual photons and WARPED SPACE ????   :o  ;D ;D



space is neither FIELD , nor FORCE


it does nothing

it acts on nothing

it has no properties BY WHICH it can be causative to anything.

picowatt

Or, years from now, we may determine that "space", when considered at scales well below the classical limit, may actually be the most dense "area" of the universe.  In other words, what we call "matter" at the more macro scale, may actually be  more so the "void", i.e., less dense, than our present visualization of "space" as a sort of emptiness.  As research and experimentation continues, particularly with respect to results obtained with the LHC, and with consideration and investigation of dark matter and dark energy, the concept of "space" being very dense seems less far fetched than it may at first appear.

Exciting times!


For example, from:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_theories

Quote
Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University, had this to say about ether in contemporary theoretical physics:

    It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo.

picowatt

And this little snippet from:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_particle

Quote
Quantum theory is different from classical theory. The difference is in accounting for the inner workings of subatomic processes. Classical physics cannot account for such. It was pointed out by Heisenberg that what "actually" or "really" occurs inside such subatomic processes as collisions is not directly observable and no unique and physically definite visualization is available for it. Quantum mechanics has the specific merit of by-passing speculation about such inner workings. It restricts itself to what is actually observable and detectable.

Bold emphasis mine...

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on March 10, 2015, 02:13:53 AM
consideration and investigation of dark matter and dark energy



CLUE YOU IN


the assholes of GR and QM call these "DARK" because they have NO FUCKING CLUE what it is


..........and they CONFESS THIS FACT OUTRIGHT




that "stuff" ,....................is the ETHER, plane and simple.