Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[TheoriaApophasis]

So a matter and a wave is essentially the same thing.correct?

matter is a dielectric condensate.

You can see TRILLIONS of TONS of it being created and shot out in GALACTIC JET formations every second.



Matter as (in atomic) denotated "irreducible" particles, of course does not exist.



a collection of multitudinous various phased wavefronts.  YES




a blind fool can get hit with ocean waves and RELATE that hes being hit with OBJECTS

such an analogy is no diff. than current idiot science thinking atomic and subatomic phenomena are "particles",  rather than attributional products of prior Principles under force and motion extrapolations.

[sadang]

@ sarkeizen

By my own metrics I understand a very small portion of my field and therefore by extension you know almost nothing about what you are talking about.

Yes indeed, by your own metrics and your own extension! That is, by your own appreciation of what I know or not about what I talk. If you consider my statement true, then we talk the same language, otherwise it is just about your "who's smarter" game.

...won't answer an elementary framing question? Yes that wins you some award for avoiding the question.

Why do you insist to hear my answer instead to read the words of Planck? I asked you to tell your opinion about Planck's words? No, I exposed the words of Planck and expressed my opinion about that words. But you still continue to play your game of "who's smarter", and I don't want to play it. Keep doing this, perhaps will win something you lack now. Perhaps!

...and someone who whines "LOOK AT ALL THE ERRORS IN PHYSICS" and when asked "Oh, where?" avoids the question by saying "Find them for yourself".

To be more accurate I said "errors existing everywhere in the current science" not only in physics, errors which exists even if you don't know or don't agree with their existence. A first example can be seen in the words of Planck, that you obstinately refuse to account them. And still have the courage to ask me to show you more! That denote a specific "well" educated and deep implemented kind of mentality, in at least the last about 50 years. I believe the same advice which I gave to synchro1 is available to you also, namely "do appeal to both cerebral hemispheres, that's why you have them".

And finally I can't stop seeing you still avoid talking about the Planck's words and want with any price to hear my answer to your question. The game you play is totally useless. And this game of words ends here for me, regardless of what you think.

[profitis]

Apophasis:'matter is a dielectric condensate.'

Ok I'm with you so far.now the problem of energy.what happens when this condensate collapses from a unstable position to a stable position eg uranium.where is this energy contained,does any condensate get converted directly into energy or is the energy from some binding attraction force between simpler condensates within the unstable condensate.what's your feelings on e=mc2

[sarkeizen]

Yes indeed, by your own metrics and your own extension! That is, by your own appreciation of what I know

No, by how easily it is to make you unable to talk about the subject at hand.  You said there are errors.  The simple, tiny, most basic question. "Oh, what errors?" launches you into a enormous amount of dodging and smokescreen.  Anyone with any expertise in any field should be able to answer that question.  Unless you know fuck all about what you're talking about.

Why do you insist to hear my answer

Because it was your statement.  I wouldn't ask Planck for the same reason I wouldn't ask my dog.  Neither of them know you or could answer the question: "What specific errors in science was that moron I was talking to this morning referring to?".

I exposed the words of Planck and expressed my opinion about that words.

...and part of that opinion that there are errors.  I simply asked to which you were referring.  If you can't answer that then you might as well not have made the statement.   If you don't want to answer that.  Then next time simply hold your breath - because you are wasting air.

A first example can be seen in the words of Planck

Then please tell me the example without quoting anyone else verbatim. 

And still have the courage to ask me to show you more

It's not courage.  It's just that if we are going to talk about anything.  You and I that is.  You need to be able to explain your position.  Which means you need to understand it without resorting to quoting someone else.  Otherwise any conversation around Planck or anything else would have ended just. like. this.  You beating around the bush, pretending you know something and trying hard to paper over your hurt feelings.  Please stop wasting your life and learn something well enough that you can discuss it.

And finally I can't stop seeing

I'm sure you can help it however you would need to admit you don't know what you are talking about and that is something you are reluctant to do.

want with any price to hear my answer to your question.

Only if YOU want to discuss YOUR idea with ME.  If not, simply stop talking.

The game you play is totally useless.

So let's just recount you make some assertions then spend post after post after post hiding from the most simple of all questions.   I've told you time after time there's nothing wrong with being ignorant of something but no...you can't admit that. I think the only person playing a game here is you. 

[TheoriaApophasis]

Apophasis:'matter is a dielectric condensate.'

Ok I'm with you so far.now the problem of energy.what happens when this condensate collapses from a unstable position to a stable position eg uranium.where is this energy contained,does any condensate get converted directly into energy or is the energy from some binding attraction force between simpler condensates within the unstable condensate.what's your feelings on e=mc2

its simplex harmonics.

whatever ANYONE thinks of W. Russell.........

he DID create a chart of HARMONICS of atomic structure and DID PREDICT the existence of (was it 4 or 5? cant remember) 2 elements and i think 4 or 5 isotopes BEFORE they were discovered in the lab.... based upon his scale of HARMONICS in the elements using his own special chart he thought up .

.what's your feelings on e=mc2

Einstein did NOT come up with that,  Poincare and R. Boskovich did.

Einstein deserves NO credit for it,  none.