Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[sarkeizen]

so einstein read the poicare's publication BEFORE his own publication

Poincaré parlait la physique du rayonnement. Einstein parlais en général.

[profitis]

So what does your model predict if we take a single photon and plunge it straight to zero degree kelvin mr apophasis.what happens to the circuitry.what happens to condensate circuitry? Does it keep wobbling?

[tagor]

Poincaré parlait la physique du rayonnement. Einstein parlais en général.

LOL
meme en face d'une evidence ce type veut toujours avoir raison bla bla bla bla

un pliagiat ... passe ... 2 pliagiats ? bonjour les degats

PS :  nota bene
einstein etait physiscien il a eu le prix nobel avec les erreurs de calculs
poincare etait matematicien ( mal vue a l'epoque ) il n'a pas eu le prix nobel ( meme sans erreur ! )

la physique du rayonnement ? mort de rire tu t'es chouté ou quoi ?

[sarkeizen]

LOL
meme en face d'une evidence ce type veut toujours avoir raison bla bla bla bla

Pantoute. Lire les essais. Comprendre les différences.

[profitis]

What the qm's have to say about photons:

'Photons don't really have a precise location. They are never
really precisely anywhere. The exist as a cloud, distributed over
space. You can interpret the distribution as a probability of
finding the photon in question in a particular place, but that
interpretation is also potentially misleading.
For example, even the existence of "a photon" is a somewhat
tricky concept. Photons appear and disappear in the universe all
the time. There is an uncertainty principle that applies to
energy, parallel to the more familiar version that relates position
and momentum. The exact energy of any given patch of space is
not a single well-defined number. It's not even well-defined that
a photon that left one place is "the same" photon that you sent
off; it may have disappeared, re-appeared, or undergone all
sorts of transformations in the meantime.
The parts of an atom aren't really filled with anything. The same
not-well-defined properties that apply to photons also apply to
electrons, protons, and neutrons, the primary constituents of an
atom. Down that small, nothing has a completely well-defined
position; it can only be defined with some real, quantifiable
uncertainty.
Written 4 Jul, 2012. 440 views.
Joshua Engel'