Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[sarkeizen]

Alcohol can only be extrapolated with yeast

Bread can only be extrapolated / created with DOUGH

Putting aside that the first statement is wrong you are still providing almost zero information.  All you are doing is asserting a dependency between one thing and another.  Perhaps I can ask you a simpler question.  Can you define "vortex" without referencing any web page or other document in a reasonably formal way?

Only on Overunity do I find people who's field knowledge is so anemic that they can't answer a simple question.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Putting aside that the first statement is wrong you are still providing almost zero information.  All you are doing is asserting a dependency between one thing and another.  Perhaps I can ask you a simpler question.  Can you define "vortex" without referencing any web page or other document in a reasonably formal way?

Only on Overunity do I find people who's field knowledge is so anemic that they can't answer a simple question.

You confuse PROCESS (Tolma in ancient greek) ......with NECESSITY (ananke in ancient greek).

Can you define "vortex" without referencing any web page or other document in a reasonably formal way?

Yes, ill quote myself...........

copyright 1-2015 Ken W.
A vortex is a compounded or compounding spatial force vector expression within which or by which magnetic-force vectors are expressed against its/their originating counterspatial dielectric locus (inertia) along a curvilinear force-and-inertia pressure mediation as against the counterspatial locus of said divergent curvilinear expression. Compounded macroatomic natural phenomena vortex (fluid, environmental) events are void or vacuum convergences against a pressure stasis. Cosmic vortex phenomena are left for another discussion, however are likewise akin to magnetic hypotrochoid expressions. As per magnetic vortex hyperboloids, force and space-creation are torsional ('inertial-friction') along golden ratio extrapolations and are additive, whereas convergences are dielectrically multiplicative. This is expressed as space is additive and synonymous with magnetic divergence, whereas counterspace is multiplicative. A magnetic vortex is a dielectric projection of force vectors, which follows a hyperboloid.

A vortex, in simple, is merely a curvilinear expression of force-against-dielectric-inertia reciprocation whereby which no straight lines exist in the universe, in that all force vectors are 'tethered' at a counterspatial locus within which and by which any and all divergences are torsional convergences as against a necessitated polarized locus (micro [atomic], or macro [magnet, a coherent mass]) which exists against all space by definition. The hyperboloid is the curvilinear expression of the loss of inertia which is extrapolated as a 3D hypotrochoid, or spatial torus. All geometry is projective geometry; likewise the magnetic hyperboloid is an inertia-and-loss-of-inertia phenomenon by which pressure reciprocation necessitates spheroidal convergence by means of hypotrochoid reciprocation. Negative pressure dynamics mediate pressure force reciprocations towards inverse counterspatial sink. The magnetic hypotrochoid is a convergence by means of polarized divergence vortex by nature, however the center of any and all torus formations, is the hyperboloid. The counterspatial 'center' of the torus is dielectric inertia, or counterspace from which the magnetic vortex, or torus is expressed necessitatively.

Even a centrifugal vortex is centripetal, in that it MUST reciprocate the geometry of the hyperboloid to converge centripetally at the opposite spatial displacement of centripetal convergence ("opposite pole"). There are no straight lines in the universe, all force vectors are curvilinear and move along a spiral around one or more counterspatial "tether-points". Contrary to the pontifications of pseudo-science, there exists NO open vortex phenomena in the universe, all force vectors are CLOSED.

Ultimately a vacuum created vortex (water vortex, water down the drain) or a magnetic vortex are both expressions of counterspace, one a localized void, the other an Ether-convergence. No force ends in space, because space is NOT a receptacle for force, rather the posterior attribute of divergences. All force vectors terminate at the origins, in inertia, or as meant counterspace.

Coherent magnetic reciprocation expressed by a magnet's (polarization collective with coherency) divergence exists as a pressure-force hyperboloid as necessitated by the dielectric counterspatial locus so-deemed by modern inept and defunct physics as a "Bloch wall".  Inertia is the counterspatial 'tether point' at which and by which all force vectors, magnetic and otherwise express curvilinear reciprocations as defined by the space they create in so doing.

The absolute inverse of inertia is nothing, which is space. Space is neither a FIELD nor a FORCE, and has no properties, is it is purely a posterior attribute of the force reciprocations of magnetism. Force is nothing whatsoever, and the expression which gives definition to all phenomena in the universe.


"Under" the spheroidal field (really a force, not a field, only dielectric is the true field, magnetism is purely a force only) of magnetism, either atomic or the magnetic (coherent single mass) exists the spatial-counterspatial HYPERBOLOID, failure to understand this will make your compression of what the term "polarization" both IS and IMPLIES impossible,... in the definition of what both magnetism IS and is meant, and how this applies to the magnet itself.

A vortex is a curvilinear force towards inertia as necessitated by the expression of a spatial divergence

[sarkeizen]

You confuse PROCESS (Tolma in ancient greek) ......with NECESSITY (ananke in ancient greek).

No, but you are confusing my comment which is about a statement providing information with one about classifying information and while there is an 'n' sound in the word Homer used for "necessitate" or "force" (it can also mean "distress" incidentally).  A more formal projection into Latin characters would be anagke and a better phonological projection into English would be anangkay. What you wrote comes out of high school books about Greek and Roman mythology.

Which is exactly what you sound like.  Some bozo who is so poorly read that you need to project everything into the few terms you know.

A vortex is a curvilinear force towards inertia as necessitated by the expression of a spatial divergence

ROFL.  As someone who reads a lot of papers which to many people could be regarded as tedious you often wonder when tedium becomes just nonsense.  Thank you for showing me where that line is by crossing it.

So a vortex is a force traveling a curved path which is opposed by another force (inertia) in some (not usefully specificed by you) direction.  Right?

[TheoriaApophasis]

So a vortex is a force traveling a curved path which is opposed by another force (inertia) in some (not usefully specificed by you) direction.  Right?

there are centripetal vortex and centrifugal ones,  BOTH are ONE single reciprocating hyperboloid as per magnetism.



dont you know anything about projective geometry and the Poincare' disk model?


not a force opposed by ANOTHER FORCE,   rather force "tethered" to INERTIA itself


The cosmos contains NOT ONE straight line,     and actually further still, the cosmos DOES NOT CONTAIN A SINGLE LINE at all..........,   all are hyperboloids and CLOSED LOOPS

even a longitudinal field modality discharge is curvilinear

Space is not the terminus for ANY field,.... its not a terminal for anything.




mother nature is NOT a CROSS-EYED CRACK WH0RE    


everything is force and motion and inertia and acceleration,    all is reducible to same and there is only ONE FIELD, and 3 field modalities.

[harhaoppisesti]

   TA,
      quote from your reply 3283.
     "FERROCELL"  "my invention of ferro susspension"
     
     This looks as if you invented the Ferrocell, is this true?
     S too many somewhere?
                    H.