Ultimate proof of Magnetic Vortex, free book and videos

[sarkeizen]

not a force opposed by ANOTHER FORCE,  rather force "tethered" to INERTIA itself

Let's try this another way. Does "tethered" mean that I can represent the path of a "vortex" by the resultant path of the curved force being acted upon by another force?

[TheoriaApophasis]

   TA,
      quote from your reply 3283.
     "FERROCELL"  "my invention of ferro susspension"
     
     This looks as if you invented the Ferrocell, is this true?
     S too many somewhere?
                    H.

thats NOT WHAT I SAID 


i referred to 2 diff things,   of COURSE i didnt invent the ferrocell,  i talked about ITS INVENTOR, Timm like 40 pages ago many many times.



i SAID ALSO a Ferro-suspension i invented ( i have 4 unique ones)

I was referring to 2 diff things.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Let's try this another way. Does "tethered" mean that I can represent the path of a "vortex" by the resultant path of the curved force being acted upon by another force?

dont forget the necessitated phase shift.


since the LOSS of inertia is PROJECTIVE .........   , /////magnetism "is the dielectric field"- FARADAY//////.................its technically a CIRCLE, but a curvilinear spatial phenomena.



refer to the Poincare' Disk Model please.


NO..........
Force against counter-force  (inertia and acceleration)


Any vortex is a mutual displacement of pressure mediations between the inertia and the reciprocating force hyperboloid which is ALSO precessing.



its strange for current human hairy-APE minds to grasp that field initiated acceleration (not as in a car and applying the gas etc etc) is the INVERSE, the OPPOSITE to motion. 


All force is just the expression of a 0 "point" of inertia,  Force is just the projective mirage of inertia,  duhh.

[harhaoppisesti]

   Timm says "When light bombards certain metals, electrons are ejected.
   This is called the Photoelectric effect".
   You say, "there's no such things as electrons".
      Who's right?
                  H.

[TheoriaApophasis]

   Timm says "When light bombards certain metals, electrons are ejected.
   This is called the Photoelectric effect".
   You say, "there's no such things as electrons".
      Who's right?
                  H.

Even in talking with Timm via phone, he agrees electrons are NOT particles or beads etc etc.




As for the photoelectric effect, Im correct.       hes a wonderful inventor, you have some kind of MOTIVE to get me to say anything against him???